handles single & multiple values for metadata columns
Similar to `Hyperlink` and `Column` columns, `Metadata` column too is unrecognizable from GRAPH API response. Hence identifying from the field column names.
`Metadata` fields are like tags. A `Metadata` fields can be configured to hold multiple values/tags
**Original List with `Metadata` column (Department) with single value/tag**:
**Restored List with `Metadata` column with single value/tag**:
**Original List with `Metadata` column (Department) with multiple value/tag**:
**Restored List with `Metadata` column with multiple value/tag**:
#### Does this PR need a docs update or release note?
- [ ] ✅ Yes, it's included
- [ ] 🕐 Yes, but in a later PR
- [x] ⛔ No
#### Type of change
<!--- Please check the type of change your PR introduces: --->
- [x] 🌻 Feature
- [ ] 🐛 Bugfix
- [ ] 🗺️ Documentation
- [ ] 🤖 Supportability/Tests
- [ ] 💻 CI/Deployment
- [ ] 🧹 Tech Debt/Cleanup
#### Issue(s)
#5084#5108
#### Test Plan
<!-- How will this be tested prior to merging.-->
- [x] 💪 Manual
- [x] ⚡ Unit test
- [x] 💚 E2E
provisions to identify fields with multiple value.
Some fields can hold multiple values and single value based on a property called `allowMultipleValues`.
For example, `Lookup` column:
```
"lookup": {
"allowMultipleValues": true,
"allowUnlimitedLength": false,
"columnName": "Title",
"listId": "21b45bf2-e495-4582-b114-839577ff8e4f"
}
```
But `choice` columns, even though allows to set multiple choices/value, does not have that particular field `allowMultipleValues` to indicate.
So in this PR we are trying determine the same by the stored values while restoring.
**Original list with `choice` column in site**:
**Restored list with `choice` column in site**
The color does not come through though
#### Does this PR need a docs update or release note?
- [ ] ✅ Yes, it's included
- [ ] 🕐 Yes, but in a later PR
- [x] ⛔ No
#### Type of change
<!--- Please check the type of change your PR introduces: --->
- [x] 🌻 Feature
- [ ] 🐛 Bugfix
- [ ] 🗺️ Documentation
- [ ] 🤖 Supportability/Tests
- [ ] 💻 CI/Deployment
- [ ] 🧹 Tech Debt/Cleanup
#### Issue(s)
#5108
#### Test Plan
<!-- How will this be tested prior to merging.-->
- [x] 💪 Manual
- [x] ⚡ Unit test
- [x] 💚 E2E
Hyperlink column of a list item is not identifiable from GRAPH's
response.
Hence this is a workaround to handle such fields until a column
definition is introduced for `Hyperlink`.
#### Does this PR need a docs update or release note?
- [x] ⛔ No
#### Type of change
<!--- Please check the type of change your PR introduces: --->
- [x] 🌻 Feature
#### Issue(s)
#4754
#### Test Plan
<!-- How will this be tested prior to merging.-->
- [x] 💪 Manual
- [x] ⚡ Unit test
- [x] 💚 E2E
Add code and tests for sanitizing emails
Also adds code for sanitizing events and contacts but we can remove
that if we'd like to address it if/when needed. We haven't yet seen
or tried to create instances of those
---
#### Does this PR need a docs update or release note?
- [x] ✅ Yes, it's included
- [ ] 🕐 Yes, but in a later PR
- [ ] ⛔ No
#### Type of change
- [ ] 🌻 Feature
- [x] 🐛 Bugfix
- [ ] 🗺️ Documentation
- [ ] 🤖 Supportability/Tests
- [ ] 💻 CI/Deployment
- [ ] 🧹 Tech Debt/Cleanup
#### Test Plan
- [ ] 💪 Manual
- [x] ⚡ Unit test
- [ ] 💚 E2E
only code movement, no logic changes
---
#### Does this PR need a docs update or release note?
- [x] ⛔ No
#### Type of change
- [x] 🧹 Tech Debt/Cleanup
#### Issue(s)
* #3562
#### Test Plan
- [x] ⚡ Unit test
- [x] 💚 E2E
some renaming, mostly refactoring the configuration (select and header declaration for each query) by combining the consts.go and query_param.go file into config.go, and making a more composable set of funcs and consts.
---
#### Does this PR need a docs update or release note?
- [x] ⛔ No
#### Type of change
- [x] 🧹 Tech Debt/Cleanup
#### Issue(s)
* #1996
#### Test Plan
- [x] ⚡ Unit test
- [x] 💚 E2E
now that exchange api has been folded in with the rest of the m365 api, it doesn't make sense to maintain an options file with only exchange functionality. Since all calls in the file were used 1:1 with some api func, those options have been moved into their respective api funcs.
---
#### Does this PR need a docs update or release note?
- [x] ⛔ No
#### Type of change
- [x] 🧹 Tech Debt/Cleanup
#### Issue(s)
* #1996
#### Test Plan
- [x] 💚 E2E
