<!-- PR description-->
add `--new-passphrase` flag for `update-passphrase` command
#### Does this PR need a docs update or release note?
- [ ] ✅ Yes, it's included
- [ ] 🕐 Yes, but in a later PR
- [ ] ⛔ No
#### Type of change
<!--- Please check the type of change your PR introduces: --->
- [ ] 🤖 Supportability/Tests
#### Issue(s)
<!-- Can reference multiple issues. Use one of the following "magic words" - "closes, fixes" to auto-close the Github issue. -->
* #<issue>
#### Test Plan
<!-- How will this be tested prior to merging.-->
- [ ] 💪 Manual
- [ ] ⚡ Unit test
- [ ] 💚 E2E
<!-- PR description-->
Update Kopia repo password from Corso CLI
#### Does this PR need a docs update or release note?
- [ ] 🕐 Yes, but in a later PR
#### Type of change
<!--- Please check the type of change your PR introduces: --->
- [ ] 🌻 Feature
#### Issue(s)
<!-- Can reference multiple issues. Use one of the following "magic words" - "closes, fixes" to auto-close the Github issue. -->
* https://github.com/alcionai/corso/issues/4061
#### Test Plan
<!-- How will this be tested prior to merging.-->
- [ ] 💪 Manual
- [ ] ⚡ Unit test
- [ ] 💚 E2E
<!-- PR description-->
remove code to send `Corso start` event.
#### Does this PR need a docs update or release note?
- [ ] ⛔ No
#### Type of change
<!--- Please check the type of change your PR introduces: --->
- [ ] 🧹 Tech Debt/Cleanup
#### Issue(s)
<!-- Can reference multiple issues. Use one of the following "magic words" - "closes, fixes" to auto-close the Github issue. -->
* https://github.com/alcionai/corso/issues/4439
#### Test Plan
<!-- How will this be tested prior to merging.-->
- [ ] 💪 Manual
nightly tests were missing expected repo config due to, breaking api expectations, causing unexpected failures due to test env setup.
---
#### Does this PR need a docs update or release note?
- [x] ⛔ No
#### Type of change
- [x] 🐛 Bugfix
- [x] 🤖 Supportability/Tests
#### Test Plan
- [x] 💚 E2E
centralizes details command processing in the cli
---
#### Does this PR need a docs update or release note?
- [x] ⛔ No
#### Type of change
- [x] 🧹 Tech Debt/Cleanup
#### Issue(s)
* #2025
#### Does this PR need a docs update or release note?
- [x] ⛔ No
#### Type of change
- [x] 🐛 Bugfix
- [x] 🤖 Supportability/Tests
#### Test Plan
- [x] 💚 E2E
<!-- PR description-->
Call repo.connect() in S3 connect command.
Was this missed as part of - https://github.com/alcionai/corso/pull/4343/files or am I misunderstanding something.
#### Does this PR need a docs update or release note?
- [ ] ✅ Yes, it's included
#### Type of change
<!--- Please check the type of change your PR introduces: --->
- [ ] 🐛 Bugfix
#### Issue(s)
<!-- Can reference multiple issues. Use one of the following "magic words" - "closes, fixes" to auto-close the Github issue. -->
* #<issue>
#### Test Plan
<!-- How will this be tested prior to merging.-->
- [ ] 💪 Manua
splits the functionality for creating a new repository struct, and initializing or connecting to it. This is the first step in a multi-step improvement for init and connect processing.
---
#### Does this PR need a docs update or release note?
- [x] ⛔ No
#### Type of change
- [x] 🧹 Tech Debt/Cleanup
#### Issue(s)
* #2025
#### Test Plan
- [x] ⚡ Unit test
- [x] 💚 E2E
<!-- PR description-->
New commands to initialize & connect to a repo on local or network attached storage.
* `repo init filesystem --path /tmp/repo`
* `repo connect filesystem --path /tmp/repo`
Includes basic unit & e2e tests. More coverage to be added in a following PR to keep the size contained.
**Updates:**
* Added Repo path sanitization i.e. handle relative paths, make paths cross platform compatible, etc.
* Removed retention artifacts, not supported for filesystem storage.
* cli docs - auto updated.
* Manually tested with all corso backup/restore/export commands.
**Doesn't include**
1. Symlinks
2. User ids wiring into repo.
3. Repos documentation update - in an upcoming PR.
4. Prefix support -> kopia doesn't support prefixes for `filesystem` storage
5. More E2E tests.
---
#### Does this PR need a docs update or release note?
- [ ] ✅ Yes, it's included
- [x] 🕐 Yes, but in a later PR
- [ ] ⛔ No
#### Type of change
<!--- Please check the type of change your PR introduces: --->
- [x] 🌻 Feature
- [ ] 🐛 Bugfix
- [ ] 🗺️ Documentation
- [ ] 🤖 Supportability/Tests
- [ ] 💻 CI/Deployment
- [ ] 🧹 Tech Debt/Cleanup
#### Issue(s)
<!-- Can reference multiple issues. Use one of the following "magic words" - "closes, fixes" to auto-close the Github issue. -->
* #1416
#### Test Plan
<!-- How will this be tested prior to merging.-->
- [x] 💪 Manual
- [x] ⚡ Unit test
- [x] 💚 E2E
<!-- PR description-->
Introducing a new `Configurer` interface to abstract out storage config information(for s3, filesystem etc) from caller code. I consider this as a short term solution. We need to consolidate overall config handling in a better way, but that's out of scope for this PR chain.
Testing
* Most of the changes here are code movement under the hood. So relying on existing tests.
* I'll address any test gaps in a later PR.
---
#### Does this PR need a docs update or release note?
- [ ] ✅ Yes, it's included
- [ ] 🕐 Yes, but in a later PR
- [x] ⛔ No
#### Type of change
<!--- Please check the type of change your PR introduces: --->
- [ ] 🌻 Feature
- [ ] 🐛 Bugfix
- [ ] 🗺️ Documentation
- [ ] 🤖 Supportability/Tests
- [ ] 💻 CI/Deployment
- [x] 🧹 Tech Debt/Cleanup
#### Issue(s)
<!-- Can reference multiple issues. Use one of the following "magic words" - "closes, fixes" to auto-close the Github issue. -->
* https://github.com/alcionai/corso/issues/1416
#### Test Plan
<!-- How will this be tested prior to merging.-->
- [x] 💪 Manual
- [x] ⚡ Unit test
- [ ] 💚 E2E
<!-- PR description-->
One of the 2 remaining setup PRs before we can introduce local storage repos.
**Changes:**
1. Read storage provider(`provider`) from config file except for `repo init * ` or `repo connect *` commands.
2. Apply flag overrides based on provider type( e.g. `S3FlagOverrides` if provider is `S3`)
3. Propagate storage provider type to functions which read/write config. These functions arbitrate on config hierarchy - flags, env, config file, in that order.
**Reasons**
* Reason 1 is needed is because config file is the source of truth for storage provider for all commands except `repo init` or `repo connect`. In the exception cases, we pick the provider in command (e.g. `s3`) as the source of truth. e.g. consider a `repo init s3`, followed by `repo init filesystem`.During `repo init filesystem`, config file would indicate `S3` provider, but the correct behavior here is to select `filesystem` provider.
* One alternative was to push provider from the init/connect cmds into an override flag, and let the config code decide on hierarchy. However, this felt hacky. provider here is not a flag to begin with. It's part of init/connect commands.
---
#### Does this PR need a docs update or release note?
- [ ] ✅ Yes, it's included
- [x] 🕐 Yes, but in a later PR
- [ ] ⛔ No
#### Type of change
<!--- Please check the type of change your PR introduces: --->
- [ ] 🌻 Feature
- [ ] 🐛 Bugfix
- [ ] 🗺️ Documentation
- [ ] 🤖 Supportability/Tests
- [ ] 💻 CI/Deployment
- [x] 🧹 Tech Debt/Cleanup
#### Issue(s)
<!-- Can reference multiple issues. Use one of the following "magic words" - "closes, fixes" to auto-close the Github issue. -->
* https://github.com/alcionai/corso/issues/1416
#### Test Plan
<!-- How will this be tested prior to merging.-->
- [x] 💪 Manual
- [ ] ⚡ Unit test
- [ ] 💚 E2E
If we continue passing UnknownService then the
command fails when trying to initialize the
graph client. Longer term we should rework the
logic in the helper functions for connecting
to a repo (see #4239)
This issue isn't present in the most recent
release
---
#### Does this PR need a docs update or release note?
- [ ] ✅ Yes, it's included
- [ ] 🕐 Yes, but in a later PR
- [x] ⛔ No
#### Type of change
- [ ] 🌻 Feature
- [x] 🐛 Bugfix
- [ ] 🗺️ Documentation
- [ ] 🤖 Supportability/Tests
- [ ] 💻 CI/Deployment
- [ ] 🧹 Tech Debt/Cleanup
#### Issue(s)
* #3217
#### Test Plan
- [x] 💪 Manual
- [ ] ⚡ Unit test
- [ ] 💚 E2E
<!-- PR description-->
One of the setup PRs before introducing local storage support for corso.
Changes
1. Export `storage.storageProvider` and rename it to `storage.Provider`. Without the rename, linter errors out with `exported: type name will be used as storage.StorageProvider by other packages, and that stutters; consider calling this Provider`
2. Rerun stringer - `stringer -type=Provider -linecomment`
3. Introduce a new Provider - `FS` for filesystem. This is in line with kopia naming for local/network attached storage.
4. Fix hardcoded string values for storage providers in test code.
---
#### Does this PR need a docs update or release note?
- [ ] ✅ Yes, it's included
- [ ] 🕐 Yes, but in a later PR
- [x] ⛔ No
#### Type of change
<!--- Please check the type of change your PR introduces: --->
- [ ] 🌻 Feature
- [ ] 🐛 Bugfix
- [ ] 🗺️ Documentation
- [ ] 🤖 Supportability/Tests
- [ ] 💻 CI/Deployment
- [x] 🧹 Tech Debt/Cleanup
#### Issue(s)
<!-- Can reference multiple issues. Use one of the following "magic words" - "closes, fixes" to auto-close the Github issue. -->
* #<issue>
#### Test Plan
<!-- How will this be tested prior to merging.-->
- [x] 💪 Manual
- [ ] ⚡ Unit test
- [ ] 💚 E2E
<!-- PR description-->
Follow the pattern used elsewhere for declaring flag names & values. No logic change, just moving code. Added a unit test for flags.
---
#### Does this PR need a docs update or release note?
- [ ] ✅ Yes, it's included
- [ ] 🕐 Yes, but in a later PR
- [x] ⛔ No
#### Type of change
<!--- Please check the type of change your PR introduces: --->
- [ ] 🌻 Feature
- [ ] 🐛 Bugfix
- [ ] 🗺️ Documentation
- [ ] 🤖 Supportability/Tests
- [ ] 💻 CI/Deployment
- [x] 🧹 Tech Debt/Cleanup
#### Issue(s)
<!-- Can reference multiple issues. Use one of the following "magic words" - "closes, fixes" to auto-close the Github issue. -->
* #<issue>
#### Test Plan
<!-- How will this be tested prior to merging.-->
- [ ] 💪 Manual
- [x] ⚡ Unit test
- [ ] 💚 E2E
Not sure if we wanna merge it as it might generate way too many conflicts, but this should help us add a linter in CI. If we are good, I'll add something that can do lints for this in a follow up PR.
Super hacky, but this fix was created using `while true ; do tree-grepper -q go '(argument_list "," @nope .)' | tail -n1| awk -F: "{print \$1,\"+\"\$2\" -c ':norm \$xJZZ'\"}" | xargs vim ; done`.
---
#### Does this PR need a docs update or release note?
- [ ] ✅ Yes, it's included
- [ ] 🕐 Yes, but in a later PR
- [ ] ⛔ No
#### Type of change
<!--- Please check the type of change your PR introduces: --->
- [ ] 🌻 Feature
- [ ] 🐛 Bugfix
- [ ] 🗺️ Documentation
- [ ] 🤖 Supportability/Tests
- [ ] 💻 CI/Deployment
- [ ] 🧹 Tech Debt/Cleanup
#### Issue(s)
<!-- Can reference multiple issues. Use one of the following "magic words" - "closes, fixes" to auto-close the Github issue. -->
* https://github.com/alcionai/corso/issues/3654
#### Test Plan
<!-- How will this be tested prior to merging.-->
- [ ] 💪 Manual
- [ ] ⚡ Unit test
- [ ] 💚 E2E
Add, parse, and configure info about retention
when initializing a repo. These flags are
currently marked as hidden
Medium-term, they can be used in longevity
tests when making the repo for the first time
(we can configure this out of band if needed
though)
Long-term, they can be exposed to the user
for immutable backup support
---
#### Does this PR need a docs update or release note?
- [ ] ✅ Yes, it's included
- [x] 🕐 Yes, but in a later PR
- [ ] ⛔ No
#### Type of change
- [x] 🌻 Feature
- [ ] 🐛 Bugfix
- [ ] 🗺️ Documentation
- [x] 🤖 Supportability/Tests
- [ ] 💻 CI/Deployment
- [ ] 🧹 Tech Debt/Cleanup
#### Issue(s)
* #3799
#### Test Plan
- [x] 💪 Manual
- [x] ⚡ Unit test
- [ ] 💚 E2E
Take in information about retention so that
when the repo is initialized we can configure
retention
Not currently exposed by CLI layer
**Requires changing the interface for repo
init so SDK consumers will require changes**
---
#### Does this PR need a docs update or release note?
- [ ] ✅ Yes, it's included
- [ ] 🕐 Yes, but in a later PR
- [x] ⛔ No
#### Type of change
- [x] 🌻 Feature
- [ ] 🐛 Bugfix
- [ ] 🗺️ Documentation
- [ ] 🤖 Supportability/Tests
- [ ] 💻 CI/Deployment
- [ ] 🧹 Tech Debt/Cleanup
#### Issue(s)
* #3519
#### Test Plan
- [ ] 💪 Manual
- [x] ⚡ Unit test
- [ ] 💚 E2E
If the restore configuration specifies a protected resource as a restore target, use that as the destination for the restore. First step is to ensure the provided target can be retrieved and identified.
---
#### Does this PR need a docs update or release note?
- [x] 🕐 Yes, but in a later PR
#### Type of change
- [x] 🌻 Feature
#### Issue(s)
* #3562
#### Test Plan
- [x] ⚡ Unit test
If repo owner info is set then persist those values
in the config file. This is expected to apply only
to maintenance commands right now
---
#### Does this PR need a docs update or release note?
- [ ] ✅ Yes, it's included
- [ ] 🕐 Yes, but in a later PR
- [x] ⛔ No
#### Type of change
- [x] 🌻 Feature
- [ ] 🐛 Bugfix
- [ ] 🗺️ Documentation
- [ ] 🤖 Supportability/Tests
- [ ] 💻 CI/Deployment
- [ ] 🧹 Tech Debt/Cleanup
#### Issue(s)
* #3569
#### Test Plan
- [x] 💪 Manual
- [ ] ⚡ Unit test
- [ ] 💚 E2E
Assumes the addition of `--user` and `--hostname` flags
Also unhides the maintenance command and mode flag
---
#### Does this PR need a docs update or release note?
- [ ] ✅ Yes, it's included
- [ ] 🕐 Yes, but in a later PR
- [x] ⛔ No
#### Type of change
- [ ] 🌻 Feature
- [ ] 🐛 Bugfix
- [x] 🗺️ Documentation
- [ ] 🤖 Supportability/Tests
- [ ] 💻 CI/Deployment
- [ ] 🧹 Tech Debt/Cleanup
#### Issue(s)
* #3569
#### Test Plan
- [x] 💪 Manual
- [ ] ⚡ Unit test
- [ ] 💚 E2E
Allows sourcing info about repo user/hostname from
both the config file and flags for maintenance.
Since user/hostname mostly matters for maintenance
don't add the flags for all commands.
Do allow config file parameters for them since
that has a lot of repo-level information already.
Currently not setup to persist these values in the
config file
---
#### Does this PR need a docs update or release note?
- [ ] ✅ Yes, it's included
- [x] 🕐 Yes, but in a later PR
- [ ] ⛔ No
#### Type of change
- [x] 🌻 Feature
- [ ] 🐛 Bugfix
- [ ] 🗺️ Documentation
- [ ] 🤖 Supportability/Tests
- [ ] 💻 CI/Deployment
- [ ] 🧹 Tech Debt/Cleanup
#### Issue(s)
* #3569
#### Test Plan
- [x] 💪 Manual
- [ ] ⚡ Unit test
- [ ] 💚 E2E
<!-- PR description-->
do not check for provider in init command
#### Does this PR need a docs update or release note?
- [ ] ⛔ No
#### Type of change
<!--- Please check the type of change your PR introduces: --->
- [ ] 🐛 Bugfix
#### Issue(s)
<!-- Can reference multiple issues. Use one of the following "magic words" - "closes, fixes" to auto-close the Github issue. -->
* #<issue>
#### Test Plan
<!-- How will this be tested prior to merging.-->
- [ ] ⚡ Unit test
<!-- PR description-->
S3 configs like BUCKET and PREFIX are common env vars and can cause overkills. Remove these S3 configs to avoid confusion.
#### Does this PR need a docs update or release note?
- [ ] ✅ Yes, it's included
- [ ] 🕐 Yes, but in a later PR
- [x] ⛔ No
#### Type of change
<!--- Please check the type of change your PR introduces: --->
- [x] 🌻 Feature
- [ ] 🐛 Bugfix
- [ ] 🗺️ Documentation
- [ ] 🤖 Supportability/Tests
- [ ] 💻 CI/Deployment
- [ ] 🧹 Tech Debt/Cleanup
#### Issue(s)
<!-- Can reference multiple issues. Use one of the following "magic words" - "closes, fixes" to auto-close the Github issue. -->
* #<issue>
#### Test Plan
<!-- How will this be tested prior to merging.-->
- [x] 💪 Manual
- [ ] ⚡ Unit test
- [ ] 💚 E2E
This is primarily an exercise in reducing the number of circular imports we get from adding the tester package to other packages.
No logic changes. Purely movement/renaming.
---
#### Does this PR need a docs update or release note?
- [x] ⛔ No
#### Type of change
- [x] 🤖 Supportability/Tests
#### Test Plan
- [x] ⚡ Unit test
- [x] 💚 E2E
initializes the concurrency limiter as part of CLI pre-run initialization to ensure we don't accidentally skip out on including the limiter in middleware.
---
#### Does this PR need a docs update or release note?
- [x] ⛔ No
#### Type of change
- [x] 🐛 Bugfix
#### Issue(s)
* #3695
#### Test Plan
- [x] 💪 Manual
- [x] ⚡ Unit test
- [x] 💚 E2E
<!-- PR description-->
Use default values from endpoint only if its not present in config file
#### Does this PR need a docs update or release note?
- [ ] ⛔ No
#### Type of change
<!--- Please check the type of change your PR introduces: --->
- [ ] 🐛 Bugfix
#### Issue(s)
<!-- Can reference multiple issues. Use one of the following "magic words" - "closes, fixes" to auto-close the Github issue. -->
* #<issue>
#### Test Plan
<!-- How will this be tested prior to merging.-->
- [ ] 💪 Manual
<!-- PR description-->
Flags for all configs-
Azure cred flags- (azure-tenant-id, azure-client-id, azure-client-secret) present in -
- Backup (create, delete, details and list) and restore of Exchange, Onedrive and Sharepoint command
- S3 repo init and connect command
AWS cred flags - (aws-access-key, aws-secret-access-key, aws-session-token) present in-
- Backup (create, delete, details and list) and restore of Exchange, Onedrive and Sharepoint command
- S3 repo init and connect command
Passphrase flag- (--passphrase) present in-
- Backup (create, delete, details and list) and restore of Exchange, Onedrive and Sharepoint command
- S3 repo init and connect command
S3 flags-
--endpoint, --prefix, --bucket, --disable-tls, --disable-tls-verification - flags is for repo init and connect commands
all the S3 env var will also work only in case of repo init and connect command. For all other commands user first connects to repo. Which will store the config values in config file. And then user can use that config file for other commands.
No cred configs are save in the config file by Corso.
Config file values added-
Azure cred -
- azure_client_id
- azure_secret
- azure_tenantid
AWS cred -
- aws_access_key_id
- aws_secret_access_key
- aws_session_token
Passphrase -
- passphrase
**NOTE:**
- in case of AWS creds all the three values should be provided from same method. Either put all values in env, config file and so on.
- all the S3 env var will also work only in case of repo init and connect command. For all other commands user first connects to repo. Which will store the config values in config file. And then user can use that config file for other commands.
---
#### Does this PR need a docs update or release note?
- [ ] ✅ Yes, it's included
- [x] 🕐 Yes, but in a later PR
- [ ] ⛔ No
#### Type of change
<!--- Please check the type of change your PR introduces: --->
- [x] 🌻 Feature
#### Issue(s)
<!-- Can reference multiple issues. Use one of the following "magic words" - "closes, fixes" to auto-close the Github issue. -->
* https://github.com/alcionai/corso/issues/3522
#### Test Plan
<!-- How will this be tested prior to merging.-->
- [x] 💪 Manual
- [x] ⚡ Unit test
- [ ] 💚 E2E
The goal of this PR is to normalize the cli packages in a way that 1/ showcases clear ownership of data, 2/ minimizes package bloat, and 3/ helps avoid circular import issues.
To achieve this, two primary changes were made.
First, the cli/options package was folded into cli/utils, so that all "shared functionality" is owned by a single package. Second, all flag values, globals, declarations, and mutator funcs (in the cli layer, logging package was not changed) were extracted from cli/utils and placed into cli/flags. This divides ownership between the declaration and population of the flags (cli/flags) from the utilization of values derived from flags in command processing (cli/utils).
This PR contains zero logical changes. Only code
movement and renaming.
---
#### Does this PR need a docs update or release note?
- [x] ⛔ No
#### Type of change
- [x] 🧹 Tech Debt/Cleanup
#### Issue(s)
* #3664
#### Test Plan
- [x] ⚡ Unit test
- [x] 💚 E2E
<!-- PR description-->
Some events in have a empty repoID. This could be because of multiple
config files used. And new config files might have repoID missing.
Solution- Fetch repoID from Kopia is not found locally in the config
file.
Note: Since the Corso Start event happens before we connect to Kopia, it
might have repoID missing if the config file is used for the first time.
All the consecutive events will have correct values. Corso start event
will start populating correct values if the config file is used once.
#### Does this PR need a docs update or release note?
- [ ] ⛔ No
#### Type of change
<!--- Please check the type of change your PR introduces: --->
- [ ] 🐛 Bugfix
#### Issue(s)
<!-- Can reference multiple issues. Use one of the following "magic
words" - "closes, fixes" to auto-close the Github issue. -->
* https://github.com/alcionai/corso/issues/3388
#### Test Plan
<!-- How will this be tested prior to merging.-->
- [ ] 💪 Manual
populate a "test_name" clues field in the
tester context, so that logs can be associated
with the calling test.
---
#### Does this PR need a docs update or release note?
- [x] ⛔ No
#### Type of change
- [x] 🤖 Supportability/Tests
#### Test Plan
- [x] ⚡ Unit test
- [x] 💚 E2E
<!-- PR description-->
- Get repoID from config for events for uniformity across repo
- Set a default value if repoID is nil/blank
#### Does this PR need a docs update or release note?
- [x] ⛔ No
#### Type of change
<!--- Please check the type of change your PR introduces: --->
- [ ] 🐛 Bugfix
#### Issue(s)
<!-- Can reference multiple issues. Use one of the following "magic words" - "closes, fixes" to auto-close the Github issue. -->
* https://github.com/alcionai/corso/issues/3388
#### Test Plan
<!-- How will this be tested prior to merging.-->
- [ ] 💪 Manual
- [ ] ⚡ Unit test
- [ ] 💚 E2E
Creates hidden CLI command to run
maintenance.
Flag names and descriptions can be
updated if something else would fit
better
---
#### Does this PR need a docs update or release note?
- [ ] ✅ Yes, it's included
- [ ] 🕐 Yes, but in a later PR
- [ ] ⛔ No
#### Type of change
- [x] 🌻 Feature
- [ ] 🐛 Bugfix
- [ ] 🗺️ Documentation
- [ ] 🤖 Supportability/Tests
- [ ] 💻 CI/Deployment
- [ ] 🧹 Tech Debt/Cleanup
#### Issue(s)
* #3077
#### Test Plan
- [x] 💪 Manual
- [x] ⚡ Unit test
- [ ] 💚 E2E
e2e tests are large, slow, and lack configuration control
that prevents data restoration explosions. This moves
those tests out of the standard CI and into the nightly
test suite to be run on a less frequent cadence. The
goal is to improve CI test speed and test stability.
---
#### Does this PR need a docs update or release note?
- [x] ⛔ No
#### Type of change
- [x] 🤖 Supportability/Tests
#### Test Plan
- [x] 💚 E2E
The fetch paralellism checks and logs occur on
every item streamed from GC. This is a bit chatty,
and has been moved upstream in the process for
a more centralized behavior.
---
#### Does this PR need a docs update or release note?
- [x] ⛔ No
#### Type of change
- [x] 🧹 Tech Debt/Cleanup
#### Test Plan
- [x] 💪 Manual
- [x] ⚡ Unit test
Mostly find/replace on errors.N and errors.W. Also turns all wrapf into wrap, and removes as many errorf calls as possible.
Might follow up with a linter to enforce this change.
---
#### Does this PR need a docs update or release note?
- [x] ⛔ No
#### Type of change
- [x] 🧹 Tech Debt/Cleanup
#### Issue(s)
* #1970
#### Test Plan
- [x] ⚡ Unit test
- [x] 💚 E2E
<!-- Insert PR description-->
add CLI check to handle http or https protocol.
#### Does this PR need a docs update or release note?
- [ ] ✅ Yes, it's included
#### Type of change
<!--- Please check the type of change your PR introduces: --->
- [ ] 🐛 Bugfix
#### Issue(s)
* https://github.com/alcionai/corso/issues/2330
#### Test Plan
<!-- How will this be tested prior to merging.-->
- [ ] 💪 Manual
Doesn't seem like we're using these
---
#### Does this PR need a docs update or release note?
- [x] ⛔ No
#### Type of change
- [x] 🤖 Test
- [x] 🧹 Tech Debt/Cleanup
#### Issue(s)
* #2373
#### Test Plan
- [x] ⚡ Unit test
- [x] 💚 E2E
In order to retrieve all clues structured error data in tests, we need to extract it from the error using the clues library.
This change appends `clues.ToCore(err)` to all
variations of `assert.NoError(t, err)`. The only
other changes are those necessary to preserve
linting, or to produce an error variable for the
ToCore call.
---
#### Does this PR need a docs update or release note?
- [x] ⛔ No
#### Type of change
- [x] 🤖 Test
- [x] 🧹 Tech Debt/Cleanup
#### Issue(s)
* #1970
#### Test Plan
- [x] ⚡ Unit test
- [x] 💚 E2E
Previously we were failing to connect to the repo if we did not have an existing config file present but could not run init to generate it (had already initialized the repo).
Error: retrieving storage provider details: bucket is required to perform this command
<!-- Insert PR description-->
---
#### Does this PR need a docs update or release note?
- [x] ✅ Yes, it's included
- [ ] 🕐 Yes, but in a later PR
- [ ] ⛔ No
#### Type of change
<!--- Please check the type of change your PR introduces: --->
- [ ] 🌻 Feature
- [x] 🐛 Bugfix
- [ ] 🗺️ Documentation
- [ ] 🤖 Test
- [ ] 💻 CI/Deployment
- [ ] 🧹 Tech Debt/Cleanup
#### Issue(s)
<!-- Can reference multiple issues. Use one of the following "magic words" - "closes, fixes" to auto-close the Github issue. -->
* Regression from https://github.com/alcionai/corso/pull/2534
#### Test Plan
<!-- How will this be tested prior to merging.-->
- [ ] 💪 Manual
- [ ] ⚡ Unit test
- [x] 💚 E2E
## Description
Trigger an event at start of every CLI command.
## Does this PR need a docs update or release note?
- [ ] ✅ Yes, it's included
## Type of change
<!--- Please check the type of change your PR introduces: --->
- [x] 🌻 Feature
## Issue(s)
* https://github.com/alcionai/corso/issues/1761
## Test Plan
<!-- How will this be tested prior to merging.-->
- [ ] 💪 Manual
---------
Co-authored-by: Keepers <ryanfkeepers@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: aviator-app[bot] <48659329+aviator-app[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Switches cli integration tests to e2e tests. Keeps the CI testing flag in place so that the tests continue to run in the normal pipeline.
---
#### Does this PR need a docs update or release note?
- [x] ⛔ No
#### Type of change
- [x] 🤖 Test
#### Issue(s)
* #2373
#### Test Plan
- [x] 💚 E2E
## Does this PR need a docs update or release note?
- [ ] ✅ Yes, it's included
- [ ] 🕐 Yes, but in a later PR
- [x] ⛔ No
## Type of change
- [ ] 🌻 Feature
- [ ] 🐛 Bugfix
- [ ] 🗺️ Documentation
- [x] 🤖 Test
- [ ] 💻 CI/Deployment
- [x] 🧹 Tech Debt/Cleanup
## Issue(s)
* #2373
## Test Plan
- [x] 💪 Manual
- [ ] ⚡ Unit test
- [ ] 💚 E2E
## Description
Create a `repo connect` event on CLI's repo connect command
## Does this PR need a docs update or release note?
- [ ] ⛔ No
## Type of change
- [x] 🌻 Feature
## Issue(s)
https://github.com/alcionai/corso/issues/1762
## Test Plan
- [x] 💪 Manual
## Description
Now that resource owners are identified via
the selector itself, rather than each scope, we
can remove the resource owner data from
scope production and data.
## Does this PR need a docs update or release note?
- [x] ⛔ No
## Type of change
- [x] 🌻 Feature
## Issue(s)
* #1617
## Test Plan
- [x] ⚡ Unit test
- [x] 💚 E2E
## Description
In a backup operation, begins the operation by
retrieving all backup manifests and metadata
from prior operations.
## Type of change
- [x] 🌻 Feature
## Issue(s)
* #1725
## Test Plan
- [x] ⚡ Unit test
- [x] 💚 E2E
## Description
Adds restore commands to the cli for sharepoint.
The restore process is only partially functional at this time.
Library files that pass auth are able to be restored as expected.
However, auth issues (not directly related to these changes) prevent
restoration of all library items at this time.
## Type of change
- [x] 🌻 Feature
## Issue(s)
* #1615
## Test Plan
- [x] 💪 Manual
- [x] 💚 E2E
## Description
Three primary changes:
1. move the list of load test users into a secret in the github test domain.
2. purge all data that was generated for users in the load test
3. fix all `m356` typos.
## Type of change
- [x] 🤖 Test
- [x] 💻 CI/Deployment
## Issue(s)
* #1266
## Test Plan
- [x] 💪 Manual
- [x] 💚 E2E
