enables sharepoint to use lists restore handler for lists ops
Changes previously approved in:
- https://github.com/alcionai/corso/pull/4854
- https://github.com/alcionai/corso/pull/4910
#### Does this PR need a docs update or release note?
- [x] ⛔ No
#### Type of change
<!--- Please check the type of change your PR introduces: --->
- [x] 🌻 Feature
#### Issue(s)
#4754
#### Test Plan
<!-- How will this be tested prior to merging.-->
- [x] 💪 Manual
- [x] ⚡ Unit test
- [x] 💚 E2E
adds list backup and restore handlers
Changes previously approved in:
- https://github.com/alcionai/corso/pull/4786
- https://github.com/alcionai/corso/pull/4854
#### Does this PR need a docs update or release note?
- [x] ⛔ No
#### Type of change
<!--- Please check the type of change your PR introduces: --->
- [x] 🌻 Feature
#### Issue(s)
#4754
#### Test Plan
<!-- How will this be tested prior to merging.-->
- [x] 💪 Manual
- [x] ⚡ Unit test
- [x] 💚 E2E
adds list client apis and pagers to fetch, create and delete lists and list relations.
Changes previously approved in PRs:
- https://github.com/alcionai/corso/pull/4785
- https://github.com/alcionai/corso/pull/4815
- https://github.com/alcionai/corso/pull/4852
#### Does this PR need a docs update or release note?
- [x] ⛔ No
#### Type of change
<!--- Please check the type of change your PR introduces: --->
- [x] 🌻 Feature
#### Issue(s)
#4754
#### Test Plan
<!-- How will this be tested prior to merging.-->
- [x] 💪 Manual
- [x] ⚡ Unit test
- [x] 💚 E2E
adds ListInfo details to SharepointInfo details
Changes previously approved in PR: https://github.com/alcionai/corso/pull/4851
#### Does this PR need a docs update or release note?
- [x] ⛔ No
#### Type of change
<!--- Please check the type of change your PR introduces: --->
- [x] 🌻 Feature
#### Issue(s)
#4754
#### Test Plan
<!-- How will this be tested prior to merging.-->
- [x] 💪 Manual
- [x] ⚡ Unit test
- [x] 💚 E2E
<!-- PR description-->
---
#### Does this PR need a docs update or release note?
- [ ] ✅ Yes, it's included
- [ ] 🕐 Yes, but in a later PR
- [ ] ⛔ No
#### Type of change
<!--- Please check the type of change your PR introduces: --->
- [ ] 🌻 Feature
- [ ] 🐛 Bugfix
- [ ] 🗺️ Documentation
- [ ] 🤖 Supportability/Tests
- [ ] 💻 CI/Deployment
- [ ] 🧹 Tech Debt/Cleanup
#### Issue(s)
<!-- Can reference multiple issues. Use one of the following "magic words" - "closes, fixes" to auto-close the Github issue. -->
* #<issue>
#### Test Plan
<!-- How will this be tested prior to merging.-->
- [ ] 💪 Manual
- [ ] ⚡ Unit test
- [ ] 💚 E2E
We've encountered an error where the user previously had sharing for
one or more external users on an item and then did a backup. They
subsequently disabled sharing for the SharePoint site in either the
tenant-wide config or for the site in particular. Once sharing was
disabled, they attempted a restore which subsequently failed while
trying to restore sharing for the external user
This PR logs and ignores errors about sharing being disabled when
doing a restore
This has been tested manually
---
#### Does this PR need a docs update or release note?
- [x] ✅ Yes, it's included
- [ ] 🕐 Yes, but in a later PR
- [ ] ⛔ No
#### Type of change
- [ ] 🌻 Feature
- [x] 🐛 Bugfix
- [ ] 🗺️ Documentation
- [ ] 🤖 Supportability/Tests
- [ ] 💻 CI/Deployment
- [ ] 🧹 Tech Debt/Cleanup
#### Test Plan
- [x] 💪 Manual
- [x] ⚡ Unit test
- [ ] 💚 E2E
#### Does this PR need a docs update or release note?
- [x] ⛔ No
#### Type of change
- [x] 🤖 Supportability/Tests
#### Issue(s)
* #4689
#### Test Plan
- [x] 💚 E2E
Add log statements when errors are encountered so we get full clues
output and make sure context clues are added to returned errors. The
additional logging is necessary because not all corso SDK consumers
will use clues which means they could miss out on valuable information
if they just log the returned errors normally
---
#### Does this PR need a docs update or release note?
- [ ] ✅ Yes, it's included
- [ ] 🕐 Yes, but in a later PR
- [x] ⛔ No
#### Type of change
- [ ] 🌻 Feature
- [ ] 🐛 Bugfix
- [ ] 🗺️ Documentation
- [x] 🤖 Supportability/Tests
- [ ] 💻 CI/Deployment
- [ ] 🧹 Tech Debt/Cleanup
#### Test Plan
- [x] 💪 Manual
- [ ] ⚡ Unit test
- [ ] 💚 E2E
Now that optiosn are being broken up a bit more passing a struct of a single type to the service handler initializer doesn't make much sense. Just remove the parameter since it was unused anyway.
---
#### Does this PR need a docs update or release note?
- [ ] ✅ Yes, it's included
- [ ] 🕐 Yes, but in a later PR
- [x] ⛔ No
#### Type of change
- [ ] 🌻 Feature
- [ ] 🐛 Bugfix
- [ ] 🗺️ Documentation
- [ ] 🤖 Supportability/Tests
- [ ] 💻 CI/Deployment
- [x] 🧹 Tech Debt/Cleanup
#### Issues
- #4896
#### Test Plan
- [ ] 💪 Manual
- [x] ⚡ Unit test
- [ ] 💚 E2E
#### Does this PR need a docs update or release note?
- [x] ⛔ No
#### Type of change
- [x] 🌻 Feature
#### Issue(s)
* #4536
#### Test Plan
- [x] 💪 Manual
- [x] ⚡ Unit test
- [x] 💚 E2E
Update the set of ignored fields for event restores. Most important inclusion is the `iCalUId_v2` field which will cause failures if it's not removed.
---
#### Does this PR need a docs update or release note?
- [x] ✅ Yes, it's included
- [ ] 🕐 Yes, but in a later PR
- [ ] ⛔ No
#### Type of change
- [ ] 🌻 Feature
- [x] 🐛 Bugfix
- [ ] 🗺️ Documentation
- [ ] 🤖 Supportability/Tests
- [ ] 💻 CI/Deployment
- [ ] 🧹 Tech Debt/Cleanup
#### Test Plan
- [x] 💪 Manual
- [x] ⚡ Unit test
- [ ] 💚 E2E
clean up the handling of deltaURL by using its own func instead of the id() func. Also minimizes the delta stub constructor by using the suffix pattern used by id and folder constructors.
no logic changes, just a quick refactor.
---
#### Does this PR need a docs update or release note?
- [x] ⛔ No
#### Type of change
- [x] 🤖 Supportability/Tests
#### Issue(s)
* #4689
#### Test Plan
- [x] ⚡ Unit test
- [x] 💚 E2E
<!-- PR description-->
---
#### Does this PR need a docs update or release note?
- [ ] ✅ Yes, it's included
- [ ] 🕐 Yes, but in a later PR
- [x] ⛔ No
#### Type of change
<!--- Please check the type of change your PR introduces: --->
- [ ] 🌻 Feature
- [ ] 🐛 Bugfix
- [ ] 🗺️ Documentation
- [x] 🤖 Supportability/Tests
- [ ] 💻 CI/Deployment
- [ ] 🧹 Tech Debt/Cleanup
#### Issue(s)
<!-- Can reference multiple issues. Use one of the following "magic words" - "closes, fixes" to auto-close the Github issue. -->
* #<issue>
#### Test Plan
<!-- How will this be tested prior to merging.-->
- [ ] 💪 Manual
- [x] ⚡ Unit test
- [ ] 💚 E2E
Part 1 of two changes I've been carting around since the hackathon.
This PR moves the /cli/config package into /pkg/config. This allows
sdk consumers to access corso configuration handling, intead of
requiring the CLI package to access it.
---
#### Does this PR need a docs update or release note?
- [x] ⛔ No
#### Type of change
- [x] 🤖 Supportability/Tests
#### Test Plan
- [x] 💪 Manual
- [x] ⚡ Unit test
- [x] 💚 E2E
<!-- PR description-->
---
#### Does this PR need a docs update or release note?
- [ ] ✅ Yes, it's included
- [ ] 🕐 Yes, but in a later PR
- [x] ⛔ No
#### Type of change
<!--- Please check the type of change your PR introduces: --->
- [ ] 🌻 Feature
- [ ] 🐛 Bugfix
- [ ] 🗺️ Documentation
- [ ] 🤖 Supportability/Tests
- [ ] 💻 CI/Deployment
- [ ] 🧹 Tech Debt/Cleanup
#### Issue(s)
<!-- Can reference multiple issues. Use one of the following "magic words" - "closes, fixes" to auto-close the Github issue. -->
* #<issue>
#### Test Plan
<!-- How will this be tested prior to merging.-->
- [ ] 💪 Manual
- [ ] ⚡ Unit test
- [ ] 💚 E2E
fixes up the generation of paths in drive testing so that paths are created correctly and consistently, even for values that will have escaped slashes.
---
#### Does this PR need a docs update or release note?
- [x] ⛔ No
#### Type of change
- [x] 🤖 Supportability/Tests
#### Issue(s)
* #4689
#### Test Plan
- [x] ⚡ Unit test
correct the tree post-process traversal, ensuring the root folder doesn't appear twice in the path. And provide the drive name to the collection so that the backup details can utilize it.
---
#### Does this PR need a docs update or release note?
- [x] ⛔ No
#### Type of change
- [x] 🐛 Bugfix
#### Issue(s)
* #4689
#### Test Plan
- [x] 💪 Manual
- [x] ⚡ Unit test
Adds some cleanups to the drive unit test helpers. Goals were as follows:
1. remove idx() and namex() funcs, replace with id() and name()
2. minimize factory duplication in helper_test.go
3. improve readability in id() and name() calls by adding file and folder variants to handle the 99% of cases we use them in.
No logic changes in this PR. Only test func updates.
---
#### Does this PR need a docs update or release note?
- [x] ⛔ No
#### Type of change
- [x] 🤖 Supportability/Tests
#### Issue(s)
* #4689
#### Test Plan
- [x] ⚡ Unit test
Instead of passing in many parameters and assembling that in the helper function, just pass in the config.
---
#### Does this PR need a docs update or release note?
- [ ] ✅ Yes, it's included
- [ ] 🕐 Yes, but in a later PR
- [x] ⛔ No
#### Type of change
- [ ] 🌻 Feature
- [ ] 🐛 Bugfix
- [ ] 🗺️ Documentation
- [ ] 🤖 Supportability/Tests
- [ ] 💻 CI/Deployment
- [x] 🧹 Tech Debt/Cleanup
#### Test Plan
- [ ] 💪 Manual
- [x] ⚡ Unit test
- [ ] 💚 E2E
Add exponential backoff and some retries when posting item attachments.
Manual testing was showing upwards of 50 retries in some cases when
~250-300 attachments total were being added. Of the retries, none
were at the max amount. However, all tests were for relatively small
datasets
---
#### Does this PR need a docs update or release note?
- [x] ✅ Yes, it's included
- [ ] 🕐 Yes, but in a later PR
- [ ] ⛔ No
#### Type of change
- [ ] 🌻 Feature
- [x] 🐛 Bugfix
- [ ] 🗺️ Documentation
- [ ] 🤖 Supportability/Tests
- [ ] 💻 CI/Deployment
- [ ] 🧹 Tech Debt/Cleanup
#### Test Plan
- [x] 💪 Manual
- [ ] ⚡ Unit test
- [ ] 💚 E2E
Adds a skip condition for emails that can be enumerated but are not returned from the server (Exchange) because
it believes they are corrupt/invalid.
This handles the `ErrorInvalidRecipients` condition we believe is hit when exchange finds an email that pre-dates
M365 mailbox creation (either a server corruption or triggered by on-prem->M365 migration)
---
#### Does this PR need a docs update or release note?
- [x] ✅ Yes, it's included
- [ ] 🕐 Yes, but in a later PR
- [ ] ⛔ No
#### Type of change
<!--- Please check the type of change your PR introduces: --->
- [ ] 🌻 Feature
- [x] 🐛 Bugfix
- [ ] 🗺️ Documentation
- [ ] 🤖 Supportability/Tests
- [ ] 💻 CI/Deployment
- [ ] 🧹 Tech Debt/Cleanup
#### Issue(s)
<!-- Can reference multiple issues. Use one of the following "magic words" - "closes, fixes" to auto-close the Github issue. -->
* #<issue>
#### Test Plan
<!-- How will this be tested prior to merging.-->
- [ ] 💪 Manual
- [x] ⚡ Unit test
- [ ] 💚 E2E
this is needed to standardize the presence of a path prefix in all test-helper trees, so that we can use standard test factory helpers for producing complete post-process data.
---
#### Does this PR need a docs update or release note?
- [x] ⛔ No
#### Type of change
- [x] 🤖 Supportability/Tests
#### Issue(s)
* #4689
#### Test Plan
- [x] ⚡ Unit test
- [x] 💚 E2E
#### Does this PR need a docs update or release note?
- [x] ⛔ No
#### Type of change
- [x] 🐛 Bugfix
- [x] 🤖 Supportability/Tests
#### Test Plan
- [x] ⚡ Unit test
introduces a func to the delta tree that allows a caller to set the previous-path on a folder by ID.
---
#### Does this PR need a docs update or release note?
- [x] ⛔ No
#### Type of change
- [x] 🌻 Feature
#### Issue(s)
* #4689
#### Test Plan
- [x] ⚡ Unit test
- [x] 💚 E2E
Moving scope backup code to their own functions allows us to defer closing the progress bar for the scope, rather than closing it on a specific line of code, which might get missed and cause a lock.
---
#### Does this PR need a docs update or release note?
- [x] ✅ Yes, it's included
#### Type of change
- [x] 🐛 Bugfix
#### Test Plan
- [x] 💪 Manual
Turns out the root ID name isn't an appropriate match for establishing the root node. Instead, the backup hander is now extended with a getRootFolder method and will pass the expected root folder ID into the tree's constructor func to ensure we establish the correct root node.
---
#### Does this PR need a docs update or release note?
- [x] ⛔ No
#### Type of change
- [x] 🐛 Bugfix
#### Issue(s)
* #4689
#### Test Plan
- [x] ⚡ Unit test
- [x] 💚 E2E
<!-- PR description-->
Use `Clone()` on item properties so that we don't hold on to graph in-memory store references.
---
#### Does this PR need a docs update or release note?
- [ ] ✅ Yes, it's included
- [ ] 🕐 Yes, but in a later PR
- [x] ⛔ No
#### Type of change
<!--- Please check the type of change your PR introduces: --->
- [ ] 🌻 Feature
- [ ] 🐛 Bugfix
- [ ] 🗺️ Documentation
- [ ] 🤖 Supportability/Tests
- [ ] 💻 CI/Deployment
- [x] 🧹 Tech Debt/Cleanup
#### Issue(s)
<!-- Can reference multiple issues. Use one of the following "magic words" - "closes, fixes" to auto-close the Github issue. -->
* #<issue>
#### Test Plan
<!-- How will this be tested prior to merging.-->
- [x] 💪 Manual
- [ ] ⚡ Unit test
- [ ] 💚 E2E
<!-- PR description-->
Switch to using `custom.DriveItem` instead of `models.DriveItemable` during backups. There is a slight impact to restore as well, since backup and restore both use a few common interfaces e.g. `AugmentItemInfo`.
---
#### Does this PR need a docs update or release note?
- [x] ✅ Yes, it's included
- [ ] 🕐 Yes, but in a later PR
- [ ] ⛔ No
#### Type of change
<!--- Please check the type of change your PR introduces: --->
- [x] 🌻 Feature
- [ ] 🐛 Bugfix
- [ ] 🗺️ Documentation
- [ ] 🤖 Supportability/Tests
- [ ] 💻 CI/Deployment
- [ ] 🧹 Tech Debt/Cleanup
#### Issue(s)
<!-- Can reference multiple issues. Use one of the following "magic words" - "closes, fixes" to auto-close the Github issue. -->
* #<issue>
#### Test Plan
<!-- How will this be tested prior to merging.-->
- [x] 💪 Manual
- [x] ⚡ Unit test
- [x] 💚 E2E
adds some new functions to the drive limiter that will be used specifically in the tree-based backup process. Also updates the limiter tests to have separate versions for the tree and non-tree variations. In this PR, the tree variation will definitely fail. The next PR will be focused on backup process corrections needed to ensure that the limit handling is correct according to the existing tests.
---
#### Does this PR need a docs update or release note?
- [x] ⛔ No
#### Type of change
- [x] 🌻 Feature
#### Issue(s)
* #4689
#### Test Plan
- [x] ⚡ Unit test
- [x] 💚 E2E
<!-- PR description-->
1. Move cache miss logs to debug, as it can be chatty sometimes. We will leverage the end of operation `URLCacheMiss` counter to get this information instead.
2. Counter renaming.
---
#### Does this PR need a docs update or release note?
- [ ] ✅ Yes, it's included
- [ ] 🕐 Yes, but in a later PR
- [x] ⛔ No
#### Type of change
<!--- Please check the type of change your PR introduces: --->
- [ ] 🌻 Feature
- [ ] 🐛 Bugfix
- [ ] 🗺️ Documentation
- [ ] 🤖 Supportability/Tests
- [ ] 💻 CI/Deployment
- [x] 🧹 Tech Debt/Cleanup
#### Issue(s)
<!-- Can reference multiple issues. Use one of the following "magic words" - "closes, fixes" to auto-close the Github issue. -->
* #<issue>
#### Test Plan
<!-- How will this be tested prior to merging.-->
- [x] 💪 Manual
- [ ] ⚡ Unit test
- [ ] 💚 E2E
now that folder handling is complete, we can ingest items in the delta tree as well.
---
#### Does this PR need a docs update or release note?
- [x] ⛔ No
#### Type of change
- [x] 🌻 Feature
#### Issue(s)
* #4689
#### Test Plan
- [x] ⚡ Unit test
<!-- PR description-->
We are logging a recoverable error in 2 places for the same failure during lazy item download. See the [code](6307d8cbf6/src/internal/kopia/upload.go (L228)) for the other location. For e.g. below 2 recoverable errors are referring to the same graph 400 failure.
`running backup: recoverable error 1 of 6: downloading item content: retrieving expired item: getting item: Invalid request: Invalid request`
`
running backup: recoverable error 2 of 6: kopia reported error: fetching item content: retrieving expired item: getting item: Invalid request: Invalid request`
Removing the duplicate since it can be confusing to the end user & devs.
---
#### Does this PR need a docs update or release note?
- [ ] ✅ Yes, it's included
- [x] 🕐 Yes, but in a later PR
- [ ] ⛔ No
#### Type of change
<!--- Please check the type of change your PR introduces: --->
- [ ] 🌻 Feature
- [ ] 🐛 Bugfix
- [ ] 🗺️ Documentation
- [ ] 🤖 Supportability/Tests
- [ ] 💻 CI/Deployment
- [x] 🧹 Tech Debt/Cleanup
#### Issue(s)
<!-- Can reference multiple issues. Use one of the following "magic words" - "closes, fixes" to auto-close the Github issue. -->
* #<issue>
#### Test Plan
<!-- How will this be tested prior to merging.-->
- [x] 💪 Manual
- [ ] ⚡ Unit test
- [ ] 💚 E2E
Makes modifications to the groups handlers to facilitate the incoming introduction of conversations backup handling. Changes include:
* new handler methods (canMakeDeltas and LocationRef)
* binding handlers to generics
* some naming normalization
---
#### Does this PR need a docs update or release note?
- [x] ⛔ No
#### Type of change
- [x] 🌻 Feature
#### Issue(s)
* #4536
#### Test Plan
- [x] ⚡ Unit test
- [x] 💚 E2E
there are certain enumeration cases where tombstoning isn't the correct behavior, and we want to delete a folder from the tree entirely. This primarily occurrs when we have a create->delete pair of markers either within or across enumerations.
---
#### Does this PR need a docs update or release note?
- [x] ⛔ No
#### Type of change
- [ ] 🌻 Feature
#### Issue(s)
* #4689
#### Test Plan
- [x] ⚡ Unit test
begins implementation of the drive delta tree support by adding boilerplate funcs for getting the backup data, and adding a framework of unit tests that will be used bring testing parity up to par with current tests.
---
#### Does this PR need a docs update or release note?
- [x] ⛔ No
#### Issue(s)
* #4689
#### Test Plan
- [x] ⚡ Unit test
adds SetFolder and AddTombstone operations
to the drive delta tree.
---
#### Does this PR need a docs update or release note?
- [x] ⛔ No
#### Type of change
- [x] 🌻 Feature
#### Issue(s)
* #4689
#### Test Plan
- [x] ⚡ Unit test
Switch restore code path to use service-level handlers. Does a few
things:
* switches existing service-level functions to be methods on
service-level handlers
* update interfaces as necessary
* moves some logic from old controller-level restore function to either
the new handlers or the operation-level function
* removes old code
May be easiest to review by commit
---
#### Does this PR need a docs update or release note?
- [ ] ✅ Yes, it's included
- [ ] 🕐 Yes, but in a later PR
- [x] ⛔ No
#### Type of change
- [ ] 🌻 Feature
- [ ] 🐛 Bugfix
- [ ] 🗺️ Documentation
- [ ] 🤖 Supportability/Tests
- [ ] 💻 CI/Deployment
- [x] 🧹 Tech Debt/Cleanup
#### Issue(s)
* #4254
#### Test Plan
- [ ] 💪 Manual
- [x] ⚡ Unit test
- [x] 💚 E2E
Rework restore return status so that later PRs will have a smaller diff
Instead of returning a status and then waiting on the message just return the restore stats directly. The status getter was only setup to wait for one item anyway and was setup to wait after the entire restore operation already completed (at end of
m365/restore.go:ConsumeRestoreCollections())
---
#### Does this PR need a docs update or release note?
- [ ] ✅ Yes, it's included
- [ ] 🕐 Yes, but in a later PR
- [x] ⛔ No
#### Type of change
- [ ] 🌻 Feature
- [ ] 🐛 Bugfix
- [ ] 🗺️ Documentation
- [ ] 🤖 Supportability/Tests
- [ ] 💻 CI/Deployment
- [x] 🧹 Tech Debt/Cleanup
#### Issue(s)
* #4254
#### Test Plan
- [ ] 💪 Manual
- [x] ⚡ Unit test
- [x] 💚 E2E
Log both the given limits and the effective limits so we can figure out if something went wrong.
---
#### Does this PR need a docs update or release note?
- [ ] ✅ Yes, it's included
- [ ] 🕐 Yes, but in a later PR
- [x] ⛔ No
#### Type of change
- [ ] 🌻 Feature
- [ ] 🐛 Bugfix
- [ ] 🗺️ Documentation
- [x] 🤖 Supportability/Tests
- [ ] 💻 CI/Deployment
- [ ] 🧹 Tech Debt/Cleanup
#### Test Plan
- [x] 💪 Manual
- [ ] ⚡ Unit test
- [ ] 💚 E2E
#### Does this PR need a docs update or release note?
- [ ] ✅ Yes, it's included
- [ ] 🕐 Yes, but in a later PR
- [x] ⛔ No
#### Type of change
- [ ] 🌻 Feature
- [ ] 🐛 Bugfix
- [ ] 🗺️ Documentation
- [ ] 🤖 Supportability/Tests
- [ ] 💻 CI/Deployment
- [x] 🧹 Tech Debt/Cleanup
#### Test Plan
- [ ] 💪 Manual
- [x] ⚡ Unit test
- [ ] 💚 E2E
Minor cleanup that will also help reduce diff for future changes.
Instead of taking in a details builder and adding to it during
restore, just create a local details builder and return the built
details to the caller
---
#### Does this PR need a docs update or release note?
- [ ] ✅ Yes, it's included
- [ ] 🕐 Yes, but in a later PR
- [x] ⛔ No
#### Type of change
- [ ] 🌻 Feature
- [ ] 🐛 Bugfix
- [ ] 🗺️ Documentation
- [ ] 🤖 Supportability/Tests
- [ ] 💻 CI/Deployment
- [x] 🧹 Tech Debt/Cleanup
#### Issue(s)
* #4254
#### Test Plan
- [ ] 💪 Manual
- [x] ⚡ Unit test
- [x] 💚 E2E
#### Does this PR need a docs update or release note?
- [ ] ✅ Yes, it's included
- [ ] 🕐 Yes, but in a later PR
- [x] ⛔ No
#### Type of change
- [ ] 🌻 Feature
- [ ] 🐛 Bugfix
- [ ] 🗺️ Documentation
- [x] 🤖 Supportability/Tests
- [ ] 💻 CI/Deployment
- [ ] 🧹 Tech Debt/Cleanup
#### Test Plan
- [x] 💪 Manual
- [ ] ⚡ Unit test
- [ ] 💚 E2E
Add logic and tests for preview backups in drive-backed services.
Does slightly change a few of the options for preview backup limits
---
#### Does this PR need a docs update or release note?
- [ ] ✅ Yes, it's included
- [ ] 🕐 Yes, but in a later PR
- [x] ⛔ No
#### Type of change
- [x] 🌻 Feature
- [ ] 🐛 Bugfix
- [ ] 🗺️ Documentation
- [ ] 🤖 Supportability/Tests
- [ ] 💻 CI/Deployment
- [ ] 🧹 Tech Debt/Cleanup
#### Test Plan
- [ ] 💪 Manual
- [x] ⚡ Unit test
- [ ] 💚 E2E
three changes
1. bumps the xsync package to v3
2. creates a common package for synced maps
3. replaces all xsync MapOf imports with the new common/syncd package.
---
#### Does this PR need a docs update or release note?
- [x] ⛔ No
#### Type of change
- [x] 🧹 Tech Debt/Cleanup
#### Test Plan
- [x] ⚡ Unit test
- [x] 💚 E2E
Just shuffling some variables and log statements around. No logic or
test changes beyond that
---
#### Does this PR need a docs update or release note?
- [ ] ✅ Yes, it's included
- [ ] 🕐 Yes, but in a later PR
- [x] ⛔ No
#### Type of change
- [ ] 🌻 Feature
- [ ] 🐛 Bugfix
- [ ] 🗺️ Documentation
- [x] 🤖 Supportability/Tests
- [ ] 💻 CI/Deployment
- [ ] 🧹 Tech Debt/Cleanup
#### Test Plan
- [ ] 💪 Manual
- [x] ⚡ Unit test
- [ ] 💚 E2E
This completes the wiring for Exchange preview backups. A few notable
points:
* Adds new config substruct(?) for limits on items/data
* Adds "reasonable defaults" (very small) for Exchange data categories
* Adds "important" and "skip" containers for Exchange data categories
All the above can be tweaked as we determine what values work best
Manually tested
1. regular backup
2. preview backup
3. regular backup
Verified that no merge base is used for the preview backup and the
merge base made in (1) is used for the backup in (3)
This feature is not exposed via CLI
May be easiest to review by commit
---
#### Does this PR need a docs update or release note?
- [ ] ✅ Yes, it's included
- [ ] 🕐 Yes, but in a later PR
- [x] ⛔ No
#### Type of change
- [x] 🌻 Feature
- [ ] 🐛 Bugfix
- [ ] 🗺️ Documentation
- [ ] 🤖 Supportability/Tests
- [ ] 💻 CI/Deployment
- [ ] 🧹 Tech Debt/Cleanup
#### Issues
Merge after:
* #4657
* #4607
#### Test Plan
- [x] 💪 Manual
- [x] ⚡ Unit test
- [ ] 💚 E2E
A handful of the error sentinel values in graph/errors.go were only around to comply with an old expectation that IsErr funcs have a matching sentinel. That assumption is out of date, and there's no point in keeping around unused sentinels.
This PR makes three changes to clean up that issue:
1. remove unused sentinels (unused is qualifed as "not produced").
2. fix external pacakges which referenced those errors in tests alone by replacing those sentinels with odata errors.
3. centralize odata error test code to help support upstream package odata error creation.
---
#### Does this PR need a docs update or release note?
- [x] ⛔ No
#### Type of change
- [x] 🧹 Tech Debt/Cleanup
#### Test Plan
- [x] ⚡ Unit test
- [x] 💚 E2E
Increase proliferation of the count bus to record runtime stats.
---
#### Does this PR need a docs update or release note?
- [x] ⛔ No
#### Type of change
- [x] 🤖 Supportability/Tests
#### Test Plan
- [x] ⚡ Unit test
- [x] 💚 E2E
