skips cleanup of hidden list considering them system generated and delete attempt for them would result in graph error `General exception while processing`
list details response for list `Corso_Restore_23-Dec-2023_14-54-05_Sharing Links` of 'hidden' type
```
{
"@odata.context": "https://graph.microsoft.com/v1.0/$metadata#sites('4892edf5-2ebf-46be-a6e5-a40b2cbf1c1a')/lists/$entity",
"@odata.etag": "\"35697c04-415d-44ad-b328-527e32a20126,1\"",
"createdDateTime": "2023-12-23T14:54:36Z",
"description": "Use this list to track documents which have internal or anonymous sharing links in the site.",
"eTag": "\"35697c04-415d-44ad-b328-527e32a20126,1\"",
"id": "35697c04-415d-44ad-b328-527e32a20126",
"lastModifiedDateTime": "2023-12-23T14:55:07Z",
"name": "Corso_Restore_23Dec2023_145405_Sharing Links",
"webUrl": "https://10rqc2.sharepoint.com/sites/CorsoCI/Corso_Restore_23Dec2023_145405_Sharing%20Links",
"displayName": "Corso_Restore_23-Dec-2023_14-54-05_Sharing Links",
"createdBy": {
"user": {
"displayName": "SharePoint App"
}
},
"parentReference": {
"siteId": "10rqc2.sharepoint.com,4892edf5-2ebf-46be-a6e5-a40b2cbf1c1a,38ab6d06-fc82-4417-af93-22d8733c22be"
},
"list": {
"contentTypesEnabled": false,
"hidden": true,
"template": "sharingLinks"
}
}
```
#### Does this PR need a docs update or release note?
- [x] ⛔ No
#### Type of change
<!--- Please check the type of change your PR introduces: --->
- [x] 💻 CI/Deployment
#### Issue(s)
https://github.com/alcionai/corso/actions/runs/7312141926/job/19922423733
#### Test Plan
<!-- How will this be tested prior to merging.-->
- [x] 💚 E2E
This reverts commit c3f94fd7f76f377e4728c715abbb8c7846e9fb25.
The specified commit is working fine for CI and development, but contains performance
degredation (solved in a follow-up pr) that we want to avoid for the next release. This
rever is temporary, and the changes will be re-instated after release.
---
#### Does this PR need a docs update or release note?
- [x] ⛔ No
#### Type of change
- [x] 🤖 Supportability/Tests
#### Test Plan
- [x] ⚡ Unit test
- [x] 💚 E2E
Drive pager usage currently showcases strong coupling between two layers: drive collection logic processing and drive api. This PR separates that coupling by moving the full item enumeration process into the
API, and letting the collection logic process the
results. This acs as both a simplification of complex code, and a clearer separation of ownership between the two layers.
A detrimental side effect of this change is that drive item enumeration has moved from page-streaming
(ie: each page is fully processed before moving on to the next) and onto batch processing (ie: all items are stored in memory and processed in a single pass). Acknowledging that this is an unacceptable regression, a follow-up PR will appear shortly with better handling for stream-processing enumeration from the API layer as a standard part of the pattern for all pager
implementations.
---
#### Does this PR need a docs update or release note?
- [x] ⛔ No
#### Type of change
- [x] 🧹 Tech Debt/Cleanup
#### Test Plan
- [x] ⚡ Unit test
- [x] 💚 E2E
#### Does this PR need a docs update or release note?
- [x] ⛔ No
#### Type of change
- [x] 🤖 Supportability/Tests
#### Issue(s)
* #3652
#### Test Plan
- [x] ⚡ Unit test
- [x] 💚 E2E
Exchange cleanup improvements:
* Explicitly clean-up folders in DeletedItems - Empty folder does not seem to work reliably
* Cleanup any folders in DeletedItems - helps get rid of random manual deletions
* Harden paging - issues where if no items were deleted initial page, we'd never make progress
* More focused search on `msgfolderroot`
---
#### Does this PR need a docs update or release note?
- [ ] ✅ Yes, it's included
- [ ] 🕐 Yes, but in a later PR
- [x] ⛔ No
#### Type of change
<!--- Please check the type of change your PR introduces: --->
- [ ] 🌻 Feature
- [x] 🐛 Bugfix
- [ ] 🗺️ Documentation
- [ ] 🤖 Supportability/Tests
- [x] 💻 CI/Deployment
- [ ] 🧹 Tech Debt/Cleanup
#### Issue(s)
<!-- Can reference multiple issues. Use one of the following "magic words" - "closes, fixes" to auto-close the Github issue. -->
* #<issue>
#### Test Plan
<!-- How will this be tested prior to merging.-->
- [x] 💪 Manual
- [ ] ⚡ Unit test
- [ ] 💚 E2E
Reverting hack since the new incarnation of user is back to proper URL
---
#### Does this PR need a docs update or release note?
- [ ] ✅ Yes, it's included
- [ ] 🕐 Yes, but in a later PR
- [ ] ⛔ No
#### Type of change
<!--- Please check the type of change your PR introduces: --->
- [ ] 🌻 Feature
- [x] 🐛 Bugfix
- [ ] 🗺️ Documentation
- [ ] 🤖 Supportability/Tests
- [x] 💻 CI/Deployment
- [ ] 🧹 Tech Debt/Cleanup
#### Issue(s)
<!-- Can reference multiple issues. Use one of the following "magic words" - "closes, fixes" to auto-close the Github issue. -->
* #<issue>
#### Test Plan
<!-- How will this be tested prior to merging.-->
- [ ] 💪 Manual
- [ ] ⚡ Unit test
- [ ] 💚 E2E
Special case Primary CI user LynneR for OneDrive CI cleanup
<!-- PR description-->
---
#### Does this PR need a docs update or release note?
- [ ] ✅ Yes, it's included
- [ ] 🕐 Yes, but in a later PR
- [ ] ⛔ No
#### Type of change
<!--- Please check the type of change your PR introduces: --->
- [ ] 🌻 Feature
- [x] 🐛 Bugfix
- [ ] 🗺️ Documentation
- [ ] 🤖 Supportability/Tests
- [ ] 💻 CI/Deployment
- [ ] 🧹 Tech Debt/Cleanup
#### Issue(s)
<!-- Can reference multiple issues. Use one of the following "magic words" - "closes, fixes" to auto-close the Github issue. -->
* #<issue>
#### Test Plan
<!-- How will this be tested prior to merging.-->
- [x] 💪 Manual
- [ ] ⚡ Unit test
- [ ] 💚 E2E
<!-- PR description-->
---
#### Does this PR need a docs update or release note?
- [ ] ⛔ No
#### Type of change
<!--- Please check the type of change your PR introduces: --->
- [ ] 🧹 Tech Debt/Cleanup
#### Issue(s)
<!-- Can reference multiple issues. Use one of the following "magic words" - "closes, fixes" to auto-close the Github issue. -->
* #<issue>
#### Test Plan
<!-- How will this be tested prior to merging.-->
- [ ] 💪 Manual
The defensive flattening of the inputs was at the wrong place.
---
#### Does this PR need a docs update or release note?
- [ ] ✅ Yes, it's included
- [ ] 🕐 Yes, but in a later PR
- [ ] ⛔ No
#### Type of change
<!--- Please check the type of change your PR introduces: --->
- [ ] 🌻 Feature
- [x] 🐛 Bugfix
- [ ] 🗺️ Documentation
- [ ] 🤖 Supportability/Tests
- [x] 💻 CI/Deployment
- [ ] 🧹 Tech Debt/Cleanup
#### Issue(s)
<!-- Can reference multiple issues. Use one of the following "magic words" - "closes, fixes" to auto-close the Github issue. -->
* #<issue>
#### Test Plan
<!-- How will this be tested prior to merging.-->
- [x] 💪 Manual
- [ ] ⚡ Unit test
- [ ] 💚 E2E
Purge events birthdays corresponding to old contacts
---
#### Does this PR need a docs update or release note?
- [ ] ✅ Yes, it's included
- [ ] 🕐 Yes, but in a later PR
- [x] ⛔ No
#### Type of change
<!--- Please check the type of change your PR introduces: --->
- [ ] 🌻 Feature
- [x] 🐛 Bugfix
- [ ] 🗺️ Documentation
- [ ] 🤖 Supportability/Tests
- [x] 💻 CI/Deployment
- [ ] 🧹 Tech Debt/Cleanup
#### Issue(s)
<!-- Can reference multiple issues. Use one of the following "magic words" - "closes, fixes" to auto-close the Github issue. -->
* #<issue>
#### Test Plan
<!-- How will this be tested prior to merging.-->
- [x] 💪 Manual
- [ ] ⚡ Unit test
- [ ] 💚 E2E
* Allow exchange timestamps from item/folder names based with create time as backup
* Parametrize folder prefixes and move to var from secrets for ease of management. There is nothing sensitive
---
#### Does this PR need a docs update or release note?
- [ ] ✅ Yes, it's included
- [ ] 🕐 Yes, but in a later PR
- [x] ⛔ No
#### Type of change
<!--- Please check the type of change your PR introduces: --->
- [ ] 🌻 Feature
- [x] 🐛 Bugfix
- [ ] 🗺️ Documentation
- [ ] 🤖 Supportability/Tests
- [x] 💻 CI/Deployment
- [ ] 🧹 Tech Debt/Cleanup
#### Issue(s)
<!-- Can reference multiple issues. Use one of the following "magic words" - "closes, fixes" to auto-close the Github issue. -->
#### Test Plan
<!-- How will this be tested prior to merging.-->
- [x] 💪 Manual
- [ ] ⚡ Unit test
- [ ] 💚 E2E
Add a secret for configuring SP libraries to purge
---
#### Does this PR need a docs update or release note?
- [ ] ✅ Yes, it's included
- [ ] 🕐 Yes, but in a later PR
- [x] ⛔ No
#### Type of change
<!--- Please check the type of change your PR introduces: --->
- [ ] 🌻 Feature
- [ ] 🐛 Bugfix
- [ ] 🗺️ Documentation
- [ ] 🤖 Supportability/Tests
- [x] 💻 CI/Deployment
- [ ] 🧹 Tech Debt/Cleanup
#### Issue(s)
<!-- Can reference multiple issues. Use one of the following "magic words" - "closes, fixes" to auto-close the Github issue. -->
* #<issue>
#### Test Plan
<!-- How will this be tested prior to merging.-->
- [x] 💪 Manual
- [ ] ⚡ Unit test
- [ ] 💚 E2E
New script for OneDrive and Sharepoint cleanup
Commit by commit review is encouraged for readability since this involves renames of older scripts.
---
#### Does this PR need a docs update or release note?
- [ ] ✅ Yes, it's included
- [ ] 🕐 Yes, but in a later PR
- [x] ⛔ No
#### Type of change
<!--- Please check the type of change your PR introduces: --->
- [ ] 🌻 Feature
- [ ] 🐛 Bugfix
- [ ] 🗺️ Documentation
- [ ] 🤖 Test
- [x] 💻 CI/Deployment
- [ ] 🧹 Tech Debt/Cleanup
#### Issue(s)
#### Test Plan
<!-- How will this be tested prior to merging.-->
- [x] 💪 Manual
- [ ] ⚡ Unit test
- [ ] 💚 E2E
Tested this with `nektos/act `so action logic should be mostly sound. There is one issue with the script installed for exchange that I believe is just a difference the container image used by GHA and the local I could use for `act`
Improved this significantly based on some learnings from trying to get this in better shape
* Reduce folder enumerations significantly
* Address issue when cleanup gets backlogged and cannot enumerate all items to clean in a single job
* Remove the need to launch one job per prefix or folder name
* The only way to clean /Audits reliably seems to be emptying (with hard delete) of /Revoverable Items (parent of Audits)
* Eliminated need to control concurrency and overhead of job spin up
* Attempt to set explicit network timeout for SOAP calls to prevent long hangs being observed
NOTE: This change affect both cleanup script and the corresponding GHA workflow
---
#### Does this PR need a docs update or release note?
- [ ] ✅ Yes, it's included
- [ ] 🕐 Yes, but in a later PR
- [x] ⛔ No
#### Type of change
<!--- Please check the type of change your PR introduces: --->
- [ ] 🌻 Feature
- [ ] 🐛 Bugfix
- [ ] 🗺️ Documentation
- [ ] 🤖 Test
- [x] 💻 CI/Deployment
- [ ] 🧹 Tech Debt/Cleanup
#### Issue(s)
#### Test Plan
<!-- How will this be tested prior to merging.-->
- [x] 💪 Manual
- [ ] ⚡ Unit test
- [ ] 💚 E2E
The script requires authenticating with Exchange admin user name and password and will set retention to 0 for all tenant mailboxes. This helps with CI cleanup of test data
The script can be integrated with some low frequency invocation with the CI pipeline to make sure the retention is properly set. Would require setting the credentials as Git secrets
---
#### Does this PR need a docs update or release note?
- [ ] ✅ Yes, it's included
- [ ] 🕐 Yes, but in a later PR
- [x] ⛔ No
#### Type of change
<!--- Please check the type of change your PR introduces: --->
- [ ] 🌻 Feature
- [ ] 🐛 Bugfix
- [ ] 🗺️ Documentation
- [ ] 🤖 Test
- [x] 💻 CI/Deployment
- [ ] 🧹 Tech Debt/Cleanup
#### Issue(s)
#### Test Plan
<!-- How will this be tested prior to merging.-->
- [x] 💪 Manual
- [ ] ⚡ Unit test
- [ ] 💚 E2E
## Description
Swap from GraphAPI-based data cleanup (which doesn't allow
us to access hidden folders like Audit retention or delete-restoration)
to powershell script-based cleanup (which allows us to make
SOAP requests against legacy exchange apis).
## Type of change
- [x] 🐛 Bugfix
- [x] 🤖 Test
## Issue(s)
* #1266
## Test Plan
- [x] 💪 Manual
- [x] 💚 E2E
