This PR adds a helper function that returns a newly introduced `Site` struct that has a site ID and site webURL for a given m365 tenant.
---
#### Does this PR need a docs update or release note?
- [X] ⛔ No
#### Type of change
<!--- Please check the type of change your PR introduces: --->
- [X] 🌻 Feature
#### Issue(s)
<!-- Can reference multiple issues. Use one of the following "magic words" - "closes, fixes" to auto-close the Github issue. -->
* #2777
#### Test Plan
<!-- How will this be tested prior to merging.-->
- [X] ⚡ Unit test
```
--- PASS: TestM365IntegrationSuite (2.49s)
--- PASS: TestM365IntegrationSuite/TestSites (1.82s)
--- PASS: TestM365IntegrationSuite/TestSites/site (0.00s)
--- PASS: TestM365IntegrationSuite/TestSites/site#01 (0.00s)
--- PASS: TestM365IntegrationSuite/TestSites/site#02 (0.00s)
--- PASS: TestM365IntegrationSuite/TestSites/site#03 (0.00s)
--- PASS: TestM365IntegrationSuite/TestSites/site#04 (0.00s)
--- PASS: TestM365IntegrationSuite/TestSites/site#05 (0.00s)
--- PASS: TestM365IntegrationSuite/TestSites/site#06 (0.00s)
--- PASS: TestM365IntegrationSuite/TestSites/site#07 (0.00s)
--- PASS: TestM365IntegrationSuite/TestSites/site#08 (0.00s)
--- PASS: TestM365IntegrationSuite/TestSites/site#09 (0.00s)
--- PASS: TestM365IntegrationSuite/TestSites/site#10 (0.00s)
--- PASS: TestM365IntegrationSuite/TestSites/site#11 (0.00s)
--- PASS: TestM365IntegrationSuite/TestSites/site#12 (0.00s)
--- PASS: TestM365IntegrationSuite/TestSites/site#13 (0.00s)
--- PASS: TestM365IntegrationSuite/TestSites/site#14 (0.00s)
--- PASS: TestM365IntegrationSuite/TestSites/site#15 (0.00s)
--- PASS: TestM365IntegrationSuite/TestSites/site#16 (0.00s)
--- PASS: TestM365IntegrationSuite/TestSites/site#17 (0.00s)
```
Adds a path.Build() func that can arbitrarily build a path according to expected standards without first initializing a path.Builder{}.
---
#### Does this PR need a docs update or release note?
- [x] ⛔ No
#### Type of change
- [x] 🧹 Tech Debt/Cleanup
#### Test Plan
- [x] ⚡ Unit test
- [x] 💚 E2E
## Does this PR need a docs update or release note?
- [x] ⛔ No
## Type of change
- [x] 🧹 Tech Debt/Cleanup
## Issue(s)
* #1970
## Test Plan
- [x] ⚡ Unit test
- [x] 💚 E2E
Adds the item struct to the fault package for tracking serializable and dedupliatable error sources.
---
#### Does this PR need a docs update or release note?
- [x] ⛔ No
#### Type of change
- [ ] 🌻 Feature
#### Issue(s)
* #2708
#### Test Plan
- [x] ⚡ Unit test
This adds the missing .dirmeta files which are needed to make sure that permissions are being restored properly.
By adding a dirmeta entry for each folder that is part of the items, we make sure that all folders get their own collection which in turn will help us properly restore permissions for all folders.
**This also makes it so that meta items are not returned from older backups.**
*Although the newer version can fetch permissions file using the Fetch API, we still have to populate the items as it cannot fetch items from previous directories which is needed to make sure we can restore permissions correctly.*
---
#### Does this PR need a docs update or release note?
- [ ] ✅ Yes, it's included
- [ ] 🕐 Yes, but in a later PR
- [x] ⛔ No
#### Type of change
<!--- Please check the type of change your PR introduces: --->
- [ ] 🌻 Feature
- [x] 🐛 Bugfix
- [ ] 🗺️ Documentation
- [ ] 🤖 Test
- [ ] 💻 CI/Deployment
- [ ] 🧹 Tech Debt/Cleanup
#### Issue(s)
<!-- Can reference multiple issues. Use one of the following "magic words" - "closes, fixes" to auto-close the Github issue. -->
* fixes https://github.com/alcionai/corso/issues/2697
#### Test Plan
<!-- How will this be tested prior to merging.-->
- [ ] 💪 Manual
- [x] ⚡ Unit test
- [ ] 💚 E2E
<!-- Insert PR description-->
ItemTypes for SharePoint were `SharePointItem` only. This did not allow for data to be separated by category.
Newly created categories:
- SharePointLibrary
- SharePointList
- SharePointPage
Breaks history for `SharePointItems`. All previous SharePoint items are available during `Corso List` command. However, when using the details command with the backup ID for `SharePointItems` restored prior to this PR , the return will be:
```
no items match the specified selectors
```
---
#### Does this PR need a docs update or release note?
- [x] 📝 : Will need documentation
#### Type of change
<!--- Please check the type of change your PR introduces: --->
- [x] 🌻 Feature
#### Issue(s)
<!-- Can reference multiple issues. Use one of the following "magic words" - "closes, fixes" to auto-close the Github issue. -->
* related to #2709<issue>
#### Test Plan
- [x] ⚡ Unit test
Have the `In` filter take a slice of values instead
of a joined string. Change negated slice filter behavior
to be the boolean negation instead of
(!filter-val-1 || !filter-val-2 || ...)
---
#### Does this PR need a docs update or release note?
- [ ] ✅ Yes, it's included
- [ ] 🕐 Yes, but in a later PR
- [x] ⛔ No
#### Type of change
- [ ] 🌻 Feature
- [ ] 🐛 Bugfix
- [ ] 🗺️ Documentation
- [ ] 🤖 Test
- [ ] 💻 CI/Deployment
- [x] 🧹 Tech Debt/Cleanup
#### Issue(s)
* #1535
#### Test Plan
- [ ] 💪 Manual
- [x] ⚡ Unit test
- [ ] 💚 E2E
With onedrive storage file names being changed from the file display name to the file id, we need a more granular form of indentification when using selectors to choose which values count as matchable fields.
This change modifies the selector PathValues to return slices of strings for each category instead of a single string, and the reducer matches on any. This will allow each service to decide what values are considered equivalent (id, shortRef, a value inside the info, etc) for each property.
---
#### Does this PR need a docs update or release note?
- [x] ⛔ No
#### Type of change
- [x] 🌻 Feature
#### Issue(s)
* #2708
#### Test Plan
- [x] ⚡ Unit test
## Description
Now that fault errors is in place, we don't need
the operation stats errs.
## Does this PR need a docs update or release note?
- [x] ⛔ No
## Type of change
- [x] 🧹 Tech Debt/Cleanup
## Issue(s)
* #1970
## Test Plan
- [x] ⚡ Unit test
- [x] 💚 E2E
Refactors the stream store so that it can comply with multiple different writers and readers beyond just the details.Details struct. This will allow us to use the stream store to ingest large lists of errors fault items without burdening the backup manifest.
---
#### Does this PR need a docs update or release note?
- [x] ⛔ No
#### Type of change
- [x] 🧹 Tech Debt/Cleanup
#### Issue(s)
* #2708
#### Test Plan
- [x] ⚡ Unit test
- [x] 💚 E2E
## Does this PR need a docs update or release note?
- [x] ⛔ No
## Type of change
- [x] 🧹 Tech Debt/Cleanup
## Issue(s)
* #1970
## Test Plan
- [x] ⚡ Unit test
- [x] 💚 E2E
Initial code movement before getting into larger refactor. The goal is to refactor the stream store so that it can comply with multiple different writers and readers beyond just the details.Details struct. This will allow us to use the stream store to ingest large lists of errors fault items without burdening the backup manifest.
---
#### Does this PR need a docs update or release note?
- [x] ⛔ No
#### Type of change
- [x] 🧹 Tech Debt/Cleanup
#### Issue(s)
* #2708
#### Test Plan
- [x] ⚡ Unit test
<!-- Insert PR description-->
#### Adds Email recipients to the backup details for Exchange Mail. If the recipients are of length greater than one, the list of individuals is included and separated by a `,`
---
#### Does this PR need a docs update or release note?
- [x] ⛔ No
#### Type of change
<!--- Please check the type of change your PR introduces: --->
- [x] 🌻 Feature
#### Issue(s)
<!-- Can reference multiple issues. Use one of the following "magic words" - "closes, fixes" to auto-close the Github issue. -->
* closes #2687<issue>
#### Test Plan
<!-- How will this be tested prior to merging.-->
- [x] ⚡ Unit test
<!-- Insert PR description-->
Selector expansion for filters includes the following:
- time flags for details filtering
- testing
---
#### Does this PR need a docs update or release note?
- [x] ✅ Yes, it's included
#### Type of change
<!--- Please check the type of change your PR introduces: --->
- [x] 🌻 Feature
#### Issue(s)
<!-- Can reference multiple issues. Use one of the following "magic words" - "closes, fixes" to auto-close the Github issue. -->
* related to #2602<issue>
#### Test Plan
<!-- How will this be tested prior to merging.-->
- [x] ⚡ Unit test
<!-- Insert PR description-->
Parent Path field added to `Exchange` Backup Details
---
- Only Exchange mail will display the path for backup details.
#### Does this PR need a docs update or release note?
- [x] ⛔ No
#### Type of change
<!--- Please check the type of change your PR introduces: --->
- [x] 🌻 Feature
- [x] 🧹 Tech Debt/Cleanup
#### Issue(s)
<!-- Can reference multiple issues. Use one of the following "magic words" - "closes, fixes" to auto-close the Github issue. -->
* closes #2352<issue>
#### Test Plan
- [x] ⚡ Unit test
Metadata files don't need to appear in backup
details, which means they also shouldn't be
merged during incremental backups. If we
expect them to be merged then we'll fail the
item count check for the merge process
This excludes items with metadata extensions
from merging by not adding the to the list
of items to merge
Also make it so that metadata items don't
create backup details entries in the first
place
Manually tested to ensure
restore(backup(onedrive)) still works as
expected
---
#### Does this PR need a docs update or release note?
- [ ] ✅ Yes, it's included
- [ ] 🕐 Yes, but in a later PR
- [x] ⛔ No
#### Type of change
- [ ] 🌻 Feature
- [x] 🐛 Bugfix
- [ ] 🗺️ Documentation
- [ ] 🤖 Test
- [ ] 💻 CI/Deployment
- [ ] 🧹 Tech Debt/Cleanup
#### Issue(s)
* closes#2498
#### Test Plan
- [ ] 💪 Manual
- [x] ⚡ Unit test
- [ ] 💚 E2E
adds a hidden flag to backup details that
allows the caller to see all details retrieved
by the repository, without running the results
through the selector reduce step.
---
#### Does this PR need a docs update or release note?
- [x] ⛔ No
#### Type of change
- [x] 🌻 Feature
#### Issue(s)
* #2675
#### Test Plan
- [x] 💪 Manual
## Description
Don't populate users when GraphConnector instance is created
## Does this PR need a docs update or release note?
- [x] ✅ Yes, it's included
- [ ] 🕐 Yes, but in a later PR
- [ ] ⛔ No
## Type of change
- [ ] 🌻 Feature
- [ ] 🐛 Bugfix
- [ ] 🗺️ Documentation
- [ ] 🤖 Test
- [ ] 💻 CI/Deployment
- [x] 🧹 Tech Debt/Cleanup
## Issue(s)
* #1994
## Test Plan
- [x] 💪 Manual
- [x] ⚡ Unit test
- [ ] 💚 E2E
#### Does this PR need a docs update or release note?
- [ ] ✅ Yes, it's included
- [ ] 🕐 Yes, but in a later PR
- [x] ⛔ No
#### Type of change
- [ ] 🌻 Feature
- [ ] 🐛 Bugfix
- [ ] 🗺️ Documentation
- [x] 🤖 Test
- [ ] 💻 CI/Deployment
- [x] 🧹 Tech Debt/Cleanup
#### Issue(s)
* #2373
#### Test Plan
- [ ] 💪 Manual
- [x] ⚡ Unit test
- [ ] 💚 E2E
While the `isMeta` flag will solve this in the
future, the current state requires us to filter
out all meta and dirmeta files, even historically.
---
#### Does this PR need a docs update or release note?
- [x] ✅ Yes, it's included
#### Type of change
- [x] 🐛 Bugfix
#### Issue(s)
* #1970
#### Test Plan
- [x] ⚡ Unit test
- [x] 💚 E2E
<!-- Insert PR description-->
Updates for `./corso backup details sharepoint --backup <bID>`
- Ensures that Drive Name is part of the backup
- Adds field DisplayName to backup details
#### Does this PR need a docs update or release note?
- [x] ⛔ No
#### Type of change
<!--- Please check the type of change your PR introduces: --->
- [x] 🌻 Feature
#### Issue(s)
<!-- Can reference multiple issues. Use one of the following "magic words" - "closes, fixes" to auto-close the Github issue. -->
*closes #2601 <issue>
#### Test Plan
<!-- How will this be tested prior to merging.-->
- [x] 💪 Manual
## Description
Leave out account and storage subpackages as those are used by tester and create an import cycle.
## Does this PR need a docs update or release note?
- [ ] ✅ Yes, it's included
- [ ] 🕐 Yes, but in a later PR
- [x] ⛔ No
## Type of change
- [ ] 🌻 Feature
- [ ] 🐛 Bugfix
- [ ] 🗺️ Documentation
- [x] 🤖 Test
- [ ] 💻 CI/Deployment
- [x] 🧹 Tech Debt/Cleanup
## Issue(s)
* #2373
## Test Plan
- [ ] 💪 Manual
- [x] ⚡ Unit test
- [ ] 💚 E2E
## Description
Renaming the funcs in the fault
package to be more clear about
their purpose and behavior. Largely
just find&replace changes, except
for fault.go and the fault examples.
## Does this PR need a docs update or release note?
- [x] ⛔ No
## Type of change
- [x] 🧹 Tech Debt/Cleanup
## Issue(s)
* #1970
## Test Plan
- [x] ⚡ Unit test
- [x] 💚 E2E
## Does this PR need a docs update or release note?
- [ ] ⛔ No
## Type of change
- [x] 🧹 Tech Debt/Cleanup
## Issue(s)
* #1970
## Test Plan
- [x] ⚡ Unit test
- [x] 💚 E2E
## Description
Remove the display and interaction with .meta
files from details entries.
## Does this PR need a docs update or release note?
- [x] ✅ Yes, it's included
## Type of change
- [x] 🐛 Bugfix
## Test Plan
- [x] ⚡ Unit test
## Description
Realized we had a race condition: in an async
runtime it's possible for an errs.Err() to be
returned by multiple functions, even though that
Err() was only sourced by one of them. The
addition of a tracker contains the returned
error into the scope of that func so that only
the error produced in the current iteration is
returned.
## Does this PR need a docs update or release note?
- [x] ⛔ No
## Type of change
- [x] 🧹 Tech Debt/Cleanup
## Issue(s)
* #1970
## Test Plan
- [x] ⚡ Unit test
- [x] 💚 E2E
## Does this PR need a docs update or release note?
- [x] ⛔ No
## Type of change
- [x] 🧹 Tech Debt/Cleanup
## Issue(s)
* #2529
## Test Plan
- [x] ⚡ Unit test
## Description
This adds information about owner of the backup to `--json` output of backup list. Previously we were showing owner in the normal backup list command, but not when asked to as json.
## Does this PR need a docs update or release note?
- [x] ✅ Yes, it's included
- [ ] 🕐 Yes, but in a later PR
- [ ] ⛔ No
## Type of change
<!--- Please check the type of change your PR introduces: --->
- [x] 🌻 Feature
- [ ] 🐛 Bugfix
- [ ] 🗺️ Documentation
- [ ] 🤖 Test
- [ ] 💻 CI/Deployment
- [ ] 🧹 Tech Debt/Cleanup
## Issue(s)
<!-- Can reference multiple issues. Use one of the following "magic words" - "closes, fixes" to auto-close the Github issue. -->
* #<issue>
## Test Plan
<!-- How will this be tested prior to merging.-->
- [ ] 💪 Manual
- [x] ⚡ Unit test
- [ ] 💚 E2E
## Description
The error type does not get marshaled which can lead to errors when we try to un-marshal a manifest
that had errors stored in it.
Repro here: https://go.dev/play/p/tgj8oq5CGFd
For now - this disables JSON marshaling and also fixes the error un-marshaling. I have added a regression test
to verify both behaviors.
As a follow-up, I believe we can implement a custom marshaler.
## Does this PR need a docs update or release note?
- [ ] ✅ Yes, it's included
- [ ] 🕐 Yes, but in a later PR
- [x] ⛔ No
## Type of change
<!--- Please check the type of change your PR introduces: --->
- [ ] 🌻 Feature
- [x] 🐛 Bugfix
- [ ] 🗺️ Documentation
- [ ] 🤖 Test
- [ ] 💻 CI/Deployment
- [ ] 🧹 Tech Debt/Cleanup
## Test Plan
<!-- How will this be tested prior to merging.-->
- [ ] 💪 Manual
- [x] ⚡ Unit test
- [ ] 💚 E2E
## Description
Pulls in fix for a panic caused by concurrent map updates in the clues pkg
## Does this PR need a docs update or release note?
- [ ] ✅ Yes, it's included
- [ ] 🕐 Yes, but in a later PR
- [x] ⛔ No
## Type of change
<!--- Please check the type of change your PR introduces: --->
- [ ] 🌻 Feature
- [x] 🐛 Bugfix
- [ ] 🗺️ Documentation
- [ ] 🤖 Test
- [ ] 💻 CI/Deployment
- [ ] 🧹 Tech Debt/Cleanup
## Test Plan
<!-- How will this be tested prior to merging.-->
- [ ] 💪 Manual
- [x] ⚡ Unit test
- [x] 💚 E2E
## Description
<!-- Insert PR description-->
## Does this PR need a docs update or release note?
- [ ] ✅ Yes, it's included
- [ ] 🕐 Yes, but in a later PR
- [x] ⛔ No
## Type of change
<!--- Please check the type of change your PR introduces: --->
- [ ] 🌻 Feature
- [ ] 🐛 Bugfix
- [ ] 🗺️ Documentation
- [ ] 🤖 Test
- [ ] 💻 CI/Deployment
- [x] 🧹 Tech Debt/Cleanup
## Issue(s)
<!-- Can reference multiple issues. Use one of the following "magic words" - "closes, fixes" to auto-close the Github issue. -->
* #<issue>
## Test Plan
<!-- How will this be tested prior to merging.-->
- [x] 💪 Manual
- [ ] ⚡ Unit test
- [ ] 💚 E2E
## Description
Add a missing err check to repo connect. Follow up to https://github.com/alcionai/corso/pull/2502 .
## Does this PR need a docs update or release note?
- [ ] ✅ Yes, it's included
- [ ] 🕐 Yes, but in a later PR
- [x] ⛔ No
## Type of change
<!--- Please check the type of change your PR introduces: --->
- [ ] 🌻 Feature
- [x] 🐛 Bugfix
- [ ] 🗺️ Documentation
- [ ] 🤖 Test
- [ ] 💻 CI/Deployment
- [ ] 🧹 Tech Debt/Cleanup
## Issue(s)
<!-- Can reference multiple issues. Use one of the following "magic words" - "closes, fixes" to auto-close the Github issue. -->
* #<issue>
## Test Plan
<!-- How will this be tested prior to merging.-->
- [x] 💪 Manual
- [ ] ⚡ Unit test
- [ ] 💚 E2E
## Description
Ties up the final piece of https://github.com/alcionai/corso/issues/2123. Add handling of moves for folder / files in delta response.
## Does this PR need a docs update or release note?
- [ ] ✅ Yes, it's included
- [x] 🕐 Yes, but in a later PR
- [ ] ⛔ No
## Type of change
<!--- Please check the type of change your PR introduces: --->
- [x] 🌻 Feature
- [ ] 🐛 Bugfix
- [ ] 🗺️ Documentation
- [ ] 🤖 Test
- [ ] 💻 CI/Deployment
- [ ] 🧹 Tech Debt/Cleanup
## Issue(s)
<!-- Can reference multiple issues. Use one of the following "magic words" - "closes, fixes" to auto-close the Github issue. -->
* https://github.com/alcionai/corso/issues/2123
## Test Plan
<!-- How will this be tested prior to merging.-->
- [ ] 💪 Manual
- [x] ⚡ Unit test
- [ ] 💚 E2E
## Description
Create a `repo connect` event on CLI's repo connect command
## Does this PR need a docs update or release note?
- [ ] ⛔ No
## Type of change
- [x] 🌻 Feature
## Issue(s)
https://github.com/alcionai/corso/issues/1762
## Test Plan
- [x] 💪 Manual
## Does this PR need a docs update or release note?
- [x] ⛔ No
## Type of change
- [x] 🧹 Tech Debt/Cleanup
## Issue(s)
* #1970
## Test Plan
- [x] ⚡ Unit test
- [x] 💚 E2E
## Description
Temporary change but based on the branch with the calendar ID fix. This PR should not be merged
## Does this PR need a docs update or release note?
- [ ] ✅ Yes, it's included
- [ ] 🕐 Yes, but in a later PR
- [ ] ⛔ No
## Type of change
<!--- Please check the type of change your PR introduces: --->
- [ ] 🌻 Feature
- [ ] 🐛 Bugfix
- [ ] 🗺️ Documentation
- [ ] 🤖 Test
- [ ] 💻 CI/Deployment
- [ ] 🧹 Tech Debt/Cleanup
## Issue(s)
<!-- Can reference multiple issues. Use one of the following "magic words" - "closes, fixes" to auto-close the Github issue. -->
* #<issue>
## Test Plan
<!-- How will this be tested prior to merging.-->
- [ ] 💪 Manual
- [ ] ⚡ Unit test
- [ ] 💚 E2E
## Description
Adds a new reference to the details ent: location-
ref. The location holds the human-readable
version of the item's location in whatever m365
service sourced the item. Hookup is incomplete,
following PRs will fill out functionality.
Also adds a LocationPather interface to data_
collections to pass this data back and forth
between producers and consumers.
Should be safe to merge into main.
## Does this PR need a docs update or release note?
- [x] 🕐 Yes, but in a later PR
## Type of change
- [x] 🌻 Feature
- [x] 🐛 Bugfix
## Issue(s)
* #2423
## Test Plan
- [x] ⚡ Unit test
## Does this PR need a docs update or release note?
- [x] ⛔ No
## Type of change
- [x] 🧹 Tech Debt/Cleanup
## Issue(s)
* #1970
## Test Plan
- [x] ⚡ Unit test
- [x] 💚 E2E
## Does this PR need a docs update or release note?
- [x] ⛔ No
## Type of change
- [x] 🧹 Tech Debt/Cleanup
## Issue(s)
* #1970
## Test Plan
- [x] ⚡ Unit test
- [x] 💚 E2E
## Does this PR need a docs update or release note?
- [x] ⛔ No
## Type of change
- [x] 🧹 Tech Debt/Cleanup
## Issue(s)
* #1970
## Test Plan
- [x] ⚡ Unit test
- [x] 💚 E2E
## Description
Adds make command for code formatting.
## Does this PR need a docs update or release note?
- [ ] ✅ Yes, it's included
- [ ] 🕐 Yes, but in a later PR
- [x] ⛔ No
## Type of change
<!--- Please check the type of change your PR introduces: --->
- [ ] 🌻 Feature
- [ ] 🐛 Bugfix
- [ ] 🗺️ Documentation
- [ ] 🤖 Test
- [ ] 💻 CI/Deployment
- [x] 🧹 Tech Debt/Cleanup
## Description
Refactors error handling in graph_connector.
Also begins some error refactoring in support by
moving StackTraceErrror style funcs into a more
normalized handler in graph/errors.go. And
removes the (Non)Recoverable error wraps which
we weren't using anyway.
## Does this PR need a docs update or release note?
- [x] ⛔ No
## Type of change
- [x] 🧹 Tech Debt/Cleanup
## Issue(s)
* #1970
## Test Plan
- [x] ⚡ Unit test
- [x] 💚 E2E
## Description
The load tests (`repository_load_test.go`) overrides the default [TestMain](https://medium.com/goingogo/why-use-testmain-for-testing-in-go-dafb52b406bc).
This results in the other tests in the repository_test package not running.
The fix is to move the load tests into a sub-package
## Does this PR need a docs update or release note?
- [ ] ✅ Yes, it's included
- [ ] 🕐 Yes, but in a later PR
- [x] ⛔ No
## Type of change
<!--- Please check the type of change your PR introduces: --->
- [ ] 🌻 Feature
- [ ] 🐛 Bugfix
- [ ] 🗺️ Documentation
- [x] 🤖 Test
- [ ] 💻 CI/Deployment
- [ ] 🧹 Tech Debt/Cleanup
## Test Plan
<!-- How will this be tested prior to merging.-->
- [ ] 💪 Manual
- [ ] ⚡ Unit test
- [x] 💚 E2E
## Does this PR need a docs update or release note?
- [x] ⛔ No
## Type of change
- [x] 🧹 Tech Debt/Cleanup
## Issue(s)
* #1970
## Test Plan
- [x] ⚡ Unit test
- [x] 💚 E2E
## Description
Adds a pathEquals filter, and a corresponding
option for setting pathEquals in the scope options.
This will enable tests to restrict calendar lookups
to only the primary calendar folder, instead of
including all children underneath.
## Does this PR need a docs update or release note?
- [x] ⛔ No
## Type of change
- [x] 🤖 Test
## Issue(s)
* #2388
## Test Plan
- [x] ⚡ Unit test
## Description
Begins adding fault and clues to kopia. Part 1
just covers the surface kopia/Wrapper, and all the
upstream packages that call it. This also
replaces the progress multierr with a fault errs.
RestoreMultipleItems changes from always
handling errors in failFast mode to checking for
failFast configuraton, and handling bestEffort
otherwise.
## Does this PR need a docs update or release note?
- [x] ⛔ No
## Type of change
- [x] 🧹 Tech Debt/Cleanup
## Issue(s)
* #1970
## Test Plan
- [x] ⚡ Unit test
- [x] 💚 E2E
