## Description
Now that resource owners are identified via
the selector itself, rather than each scope, we
can remove the resource owner data from
scope production and data.
## Does this PR need a docs update or release note?
- [x] ⛔ No
## Type of change
- [x] 🌻 Feature
## Issue(s)
* #1617
## Test Plan
- [x] ⚡ Unit test
- [x] 💚 E2E
## Description
selector creation now includes a parameter for
a slice of resource owners (users or sites). This
is step one in migrating resource owner lists out
of scopes and into the selector. next step is to
have the selector utilize the primary list instead
of the per-scope list.
## Does this PR need a docs update or release note?
- [x] ⛔ No
## Type of change
- [x] 🌻 Feature
## Issue(s)
* #1617
## Test Plan
- [x] ⚡ Unit test
- [x] 💚 E2E
Reverts alcionai/corso#1835 now that #1841 is in. That should help with the flakiness.
I will follow up with another PR after though that moves these tests to a post-CI job (we don't need to run these on every commit)
## Description
These tests have the highes rate of timeout
based failures, while providing the most loose
gurantees about system behavior. This will
temporarily disable them while we consider
separating our suite between integration
and e2e smoke sets.
## Does this PR need a docs update or release note?
- [x] ⛔ No
## Type of change
- [x] 🤖 Test
## Test Plan
- [x] 💚 E2E
## Description
Show messages for specific user interactions which previously had none.
## Type of change
<!--- Please check the type of change your PR introduces: --->
- [ ] 🌻 Feature
- [ ] 🐛 Bugfix
- [ ] 🗺️ Documentation
- [ ] 🤖 Test
- [ ] 💻 CI/Deployment
- [x] 🐹 Trivial/Minor
## Issue(s)
<!-- Can reference multiple issues. Use one of the following "magic words" - "closes, fixes" to auto-close the Github issue. -->
* fixes https://github.com/alcionai/corso/issues/1177
## Test Plan
<!-- How will this be tested prior to merging.-->
- [x] 💪 Manual
- [ ] ⚡ Unit test
- [x] 💚 E2E
