skips cleanup of hidden list considering them system generated and delete attempt for them would result in graph error `General exception while processing`
list details response for list `Corso_Restore_23-Dec-2023_14-54-05_Sharing Links` of 'hidden' type
```
{
"@odata.context": "https://graph.microsoft.com/v1.0/$metadata#sites('4892edf5-2ebf-46be-a6e5-a40b2cbf1c1a')/lists/$entity",
"@odata.etag": "\"35697c04-415d-44ad-b328-527e32a20126,1\"",
"createdDateTime": "2023-12-23T14:54:36Z",
"description": "Use this list to track documents which have internal or anonymous sharing links in the site.",
"eTag": "\"35697c04-415d-44ad-b328-527e32a20126,1\"",
"id": "35697c04-415d-44ad-b328-527e32a20126",
"lastModifiedDateTime": "2023-12-23T14:55:07Z",
"name": "Corso_Restore_23Dec2023_145405_Sharing Links",
"webUrl": "https://10rqc2.sharepoint.com/sites/CorsoCI/Corso_Restore_23Dec2023_145405_Sharing%20Links",
"displayName": "Corso_Restore_23-Dec-2023_14-54-05_Sharing Links",
"createdBy": {
"user": {
"displayName": "SharePoint App"
}
},
"parentReference": {
"siteId": "10rqc2.sharepoint.com,4892edf5-2ebf-46be-a6e5-a40b2cbf1c1a,38ab6d06-fc82-4417-af93-22d8733c22be"
},
"list": {
"contentTypesEnabled": false,
"hidden": true,
"template": "sharingLinks"
}
}
```
#### Does this PR need a docs update or release note?
- [x] ⛔ No
#### Type of change
<!--- Please check the type of change your PR introduces: --->
- [x] 💻 CI/Deployment
#### Issue(s)
https://github.com/alcionai/corso/actions/runs/7312141926/job/19922423733
#### Test Plan
<!-- How will this be tested prior to merging.-->
- [x] 💚 E2E
This reverts commit c3f94fd7f76f377e4728c715abbb8c7846e9fb25.
The specified commit is working fine for CI and development, but contains performance
degredation (solved in a follow-up pr) that we want to avoid for the next release. This
rever is temporary, and the changes will be re-instated after release.
---
#### Does this PR need a docs update or release note?
- [x] ⛔ No
#### Type of change
- [x] 🤖 Supportability/Tests
#### Test Plan
- [x] ⚡ Unit test
- [x] 💚 E2E
Drive pager usage currently showcases strong coupling between two layers: drive collection logic processing and drive api. This PR separates that coupling by moving the full item enumeration process into the
API, and letting the collection logic process the
results. This acs as both a simplification of complex code, and a clearer separation of ownership between the two layers.
A detrimental side effect of this change is that drive item enumeration has moved from page-streaming
(ie: each page is fully processed before moving on to the next) and onto batch processing (ie: all items are stored in memory and processed in a single pass). Acknowledging that this is an unacceptable regression, a follow-up PR will appear shortly with better handling for stream-processing enumeration from the API layer as a standard part of the pattern for all pager
implementations.
---
#### Does this PR need a docs update or release note?
- [x] ⛔ No
#### Type of change
- [x] 🧹 Tech Debt/Cleanup
#### Test Plan
- [x] ⚡ Unit test
- [x] 💚 E2E
#### Does this PR need a docs update or release note?
- [x] ⛔ No
#### Type of change
- [x] 🤖 Supportability/Tests
#### Issue(s)
* #3652
#### Test Plan
- [x] ⚡ Unit test
- [x] 💚 E2E
Exchange cleanup improvements:
* Explicitly clean-up folders in DeletedItems - Empty folder does not seem to work reliably
* Cleanup any folders in DeletedItems - helps get rid of random manual deletions
* Harden paging - issues where if no items were deleted initial page, we'd never make progress
* More focused search on `msgfolderroot`
---
#### Does this PR need a docs update or release note?
- [ ] ✅ Yes, it's included
- [ ] 🕐 Yes, but in a later PR
- [x] ⛔ No
#### Type of change
<!--- Please check the type of change your PR introduces: --->
- [ ] 🌻 Feature
- [x] 🐛 Bugfix
- [ ] 🗺️ Documentation
- [ ] 🤖 Supportability/Tests
- [x] 💻 CI/Deployment
- [ ] 🧹 Tech Debt/Cleanup
#### Issue(s)
<!-- Can reference multiple issues. Use one of the following "magic words" - "closes, fixes" to auto-close the Github issue. -->
* #<issue>
#### Test Plan
<!-- How will this be tested prior to merging.-->
- [x] 💪 Manual
- [ ] ⚡ Unit test
- [ ] 💚 E2E
Reverting hack since the new incarnation of user is back to proper URL
---
#### Does this PR need a docs update or release note?
- [ ] ✅ Yes, it's included
- [ ] 🕐 Yes, but in a later PR
- [ ] ⛔ No
#### Type of change
<!--- Please check the type of change your PR introduces: --->
- [ ] 🌻 Feature
- [x] 🐛 Bugfix
- [ ] 🗺️ Documentation
- [ ] 🤖 Supportability/Tests
- [x] 💻 CI/Deployment
- [ ] 🧹 Tech Debt/Cleanup
#### Issue(s)
<!-- Can reference multiple issues. Use one of the following "magic words" - "closes, fixes" to auto-close the Github issue. -->
* #<issue>
#### Test Plan
<!-- How will this be tested prior to merging.-->
- [ ] 💪 Manual
- [ ] ⚡ Unit test
- [ ] 💚 E2E
ensure that all drive-baased graph client calls exist in the m365/api package, not defined ad-hoc throughout the codebase.
---
#### Does this PR need a docs update or release note?
- [x] ⛔ No
#### Type of change
- [x] 🧹 Tech Debt/Cleanup
#### Issue(s)
* #1996
#### Test Plan
- [x] ⚡ Unit test
- [x] 💚 E2E
now that exchange api has been folded in with the rest of the m365 api, it doesn't make sense to maintain an options file with only exchange functionality. Since all calls in the file were used 1:1 with some api func, those options have been moved into their respective api funcs.
---
#### Does this PR need a docs update or release note?
- [x] ⛔ No
#### Type of change
- [x] 🧹 Tech Debt/Cleanup
#### Issue(s)
* #1996
#### Test Plan
- [x] 💚 E2E
Separates the log level and log format. This will allows sdk consumers using `SeedLogger` to utilize JSON
format logs without sacrificing log level controls.
---
#### Does this PR need a docs update or release note?
- [x] ⛔ No
#### Type of change
- [x] 🤖 Supportability/Tests
#### Test Plan
- [x] 💪 Manual
Special case Primary CI user LynneR for OneDrive CI cleanup
<!-- PR description-->
---
#### Does this PR need a docs update or release note?
- [ ] ✅ Yes, it's included
- [ ] 🕐 Yes, but in a later PR
- [ ] ⛔ No
#### Type of change
<!--- Please check the type of change your PR introduces: --->
- [ ] 🌻 Feature
- [x] 🐛 Bugfix
- [ ] 🗺️ Documentation
- [ ] 🤖 Supportability/Tests
- [ ] 💻 CI/Deployment
- [ ] 🧹 Tech Debt/Cleanup
#### Issue(s)
<!-- Can reference multiple issues. Use one of the following "magic words" - "closes, fixes" to auto-close the Github issue. -->
* #<issue>
#### Test Plan
<!-- How will this be tested prior to merging.-->
- [x] 💪 Manual
- [ ] ⚡ Unit test
- [ ] 💚 E2E
moves common/time.go to common/dttm/dttm.go, and renames many of the consts and funcs with names that better explain their design and intent of usage.
Only code movement, no logical changes.
---
#### Does this PR need a docs update or release note?
- [x] ⛔ No
#### Type of change
- [x] 🧹 Tech Debt/Cleanup
#### Test Plan
- [x] ⚡ Unit test
- [x] 💚 E2E
It's an unnecessary paramter. Plus, this sets up the next pr to have a smaller footprint.
---
#### Does this PR need a docs update or release note?
- [x] ⛔ No
#### Type of change
- [x] 🧹 Tech Debt/Cleanup
#### Issue(s)
* #3129
#### Test Plan
- [x] ⚡ Unit test
- [x] 💚 E2E
<!-- PR description-->
---
#### Does this PR need a docs update or release note?
- [ ] ⛔ No
#### Type of change
<!--- Please check the type of change your PR introduces: --->
- [ ] 🧹 Tech Debt/Cleanup
#### Issue(s)
<!-- Can reference multiple issues. Use one of the following "magic words" - "closes, fixes" to auto-close the Github issue. -->
* #<issue>
#### Test Plan
<!-- How will this be tested prior to merging.-->
- [ ] 💪 Manual
The defensive flattening of the inputs was at the wrong place.
---
#### Does this PR need a docs update or release note?
- [ ] ✅ Yes, it's included
- [ ] 🕐 Yes, but in a later PR
- [ ] ⛔ No
#### Type of change
<!--- Please check the type of change your PR introduces: --->
- [ ] 🌻 Feature
- [x] 🐛 Bugfix
- [ ] 🗺️ Documentation
- [ ] 🤖 Supportability/Tests
- [x] 💻 CI/Deployment
- [ ] 🧹 Tech Debt/Cleanup
#### Issue(s)
<!-- Can reference multiple issues. Use one of the following "magic words" - "closes, fixes" to auto-close the Github issue. -->
* #<issue>
#### Test Plan
<!-- How will this be tested prior to merging.-->
- [x] 💪 Manual
- [ ] ⚡ Unit test
- [ ] 💚 E2E
Purge events birthdays corresponding to old contacts
---
#### Does this PR need a docs update or release note?
- [ ] ✅ Yes, it's included
- [ ] 🕐 Yes, but in a later PR
- [x] ⛔ No
#### Type of change
<!--- Please check the type of change your PR introduces: --->
- [ ] 🌻 Feature
- [x] 🐛 Bugfix
- [ ] 🗺️ Documentation
- [ ] 🤖 Supportability/Tests
- [x] 💻 CI/Deployment
- [ ] 🧹 Tech Debt/Cleanup
#### Issue(s)
<!-- Can reference multiple issues. Use one of the following "magic words" - "closes, fixes" to auto-close the Github issue. -->
* #<issue>
#### Test Plan
<!-- How will this be tested prior to merging.-->
- [x] 💪 Manual
- [ ] ⚡ Unit test
- [ ] 💚 E2E
* Allow exchange timestamps from item/folder names based with create time as backup
* Parametrize folder prefixes and move to var from secrets for ease of management. There is nothing sensitive
---
#### Does this PR need a docs update or release note?
- [ ] ✅ Yes, it's included
- [ ] 🕐 Yes, but in a later PR
- [x] ⛔ No
#### Type of change
<!--- Please check the type of change your PR introduces: --->
- [ ] 🌻 Feature
- [x] 🐛 Bugfix
- [ ] 🗺️ Documentation
- [ ] 🤖 Supportability/Tests
- [x] 💻 CI/Deployment
- [ ] 🧹 Tech Debt/Cleanup
#### Issue(s)
<!-- Can reference multiple issues. Use one of the following "magic words" - "closes, fixes" to auto-close the Github issue. -->
#### Test Plan
<!-- How will this be tested prior to merging.-->
- [x] 💪 Manual
- [ ] ⚡ Unit test
- [ ] 💚 E2E
Fixes current errors as well
---
#### Does this PR need a docs update or release note?
- [ ] ✅ Yes, it's included
- [ ] 🕐 Yes, but in a later PR
- [x] ⛔ No
#### Type of change
- [ ] 🌻 Feature
- [ ] 🐛 Bugfix
- [ ] 🗺️ Documentation
- [ ] 🤖 Supportability/Tests
- [ ] 💻 CI/Deployment
- [x] 🧹 Tech Debt/Cleanup
#### Issue(s)
* closes#2927
#### Test Plan
- [x] 💪 Manual
- [ ] ⚡ Unit test
- [ ] 💚 E2E
Mostly find/replace on errors.N and errors.W. Also turns all wrapf into wrap, and removes as many errorf calls as possible.
Might follow up with a linter to enforce this change.
---
#### Does this PR need a docs update or release note?
- [x] ⛔ No
#### Type of change
- [x] 🧹 Tech Debt/Cleanup
#### Issue(s)
* #1970
#### Test Plan
- [x] ⚡ Unit test
- [x] 💚 E2E
Add a secret for configuring SP libraries to purge
---
#### Does this PR need a docs update or release note?
- [ ] ✅ Yes, it's included
- [ ] 🕐 Yes, but in a later PR
- [x] ⛔ No
#### Type of change
<!--- Please check the type of change your PR introduces: --->
- [ ] 🌻 Feature
- [ ] 🐛 Bugfix
- [ ] 🗺️ Documentation
- [ ] 🤖 Supportability/Tests
- [x] 💻 CI/Deployment
- [ ] 🧹 Tech Debt/Cleanup
#### Issue(s)
<!-- Can reference multiple issues. Use one of the following "magic words" - "closes, fixes" to auto-close the Github issue. -->
* #<issue>
#### Test Plan
<!-- How will this be tested prior to merging.-->
- [x] 💪 Manual
- [ ] ⚡ Unit test
- [ ] 💚 E2E
changes a couple things in the backup cli output:
* appends the backup id after completion
* prints an error if the backup fails
* replaces multierr with a clues error
* logs each backup failure individually
---
#### Does this PR need a docs update or release note?
- [x] ⛔ No
#### Type of change
- [x] 🧹 Tech Debt/Cleanup
#### Issue(s)
* #1970
#### Test Plan
- [x] 💪 Manual
New script for OneDrive and Sharepoint cleanup
Commit by commit review is encouraged for readability since this involves renames of older scripts.
---
#### Does this PR need a docs update or release note?
- [ ] ✅ Yes, it's included
- [ ] 🕐 Yes, but in a later PR
- [x] ⛔ No
#### Type of change
<!--- Please check the type of change your PR introduces: --->
- [ ] 🌻 Feature
- [ ] 🐛 Bugfix
- [ ] 🗺️ Documentation
- [ ] 🤖 Test
- [x] 💻 CI/Deployment
- [ ] 🧹 Tech Debt/Cleanup
#### Issue(s)
#### Test Plan
<!-- How will this be tested prior to merging.-->
- [x] 💪 Manual
- [ ] ⚡ Unit test
- [ ] 💚 E2E
Tested this with `nektos/act `so action logic should be mostly sound. There is one issue with the script installed for exchange that I believe is just a difference the container image used by GHA and the local I could use for `act`
Improved this significantly based on some learnings from trying to get this in better shape
* Reduce folder enumerations significantly
* Address issue when cleanup gets backlogged and cannot enumerate all items to clean in a single job
* Remove the need to launch one job per prefix or folder name
* The only way to clean /Audits reliably seems to be emptying (with hard delete) of /Revoverable Items (parent of Audits)
* Eliminated need to control concurrency and overhead of job spin up
* Attempt to set explicit network timeout for SOAP calls to prevent long hangs being observed
NOTE: This change affect both cleanup script and the corresponding GHA workflow
---
#### Does this PR need a docs update or release note?
- [ ] ✅ Yes, it's included
- [ ] 🕐 Yes, but in a later PR
- [x] ⛔ No
#### Type of change
<!--- Please check the type of change your PR introduces: --->
- [ ] 🌻 Feature
- [ ] 🐛 Bugfix
- [ ] 🗺️ Documentation
- [ ] 🤖 Test
- [x] 💻 CI/Deployment
- [ ] 🧹 Tech Debt/Cleanup
#### Issue(s)
#### Test Plan
<!-- How will this be tested prior to merging.-->
- [x] 💪 Manual
- [ ] ⚡ Unit test
- [ ] 💚 E2E
Adds a new streamstore controller for fault.Errors. This provides large scale, extensible file storage for fault errors to be persisted, much like we do for backup details.
---
#### Does this PR need a docs update or release note?
- [x] ⛔ No
#### Type of change
- [x] 🌻 Feature
#### Issue(s)
* #2708
#### Test Plan
- [x] 💚 E2E
The script requires authenticating with Exchange admin user name and password and will set retention to 0 for all tenant mailboxes. This helps with CI cleanup of test data
The script can be integrated with some low frequency invocation with the CI pipeline to make sure the retention is properly set. Would require setting the credentials as Git secrets
---
#### Does this PR need a docs update or release note?
- [ ] ✅ Yes, it's included
- [ ] 🕐 Yes, but in a later PR
- [x] ⛔ No
#### Type of change
<!--- Please check the type of change your PR introduces: --->
- [ ] 🌻 Feature
- [ ] 🐛 Bugfix
- [ ] 🗺️ Documentation
- [ ] 🤖 Test
- [x] 💻 CI/Deployment
- [ ] 🧹 Tech Debt/Cleanup
#### Issue(s)
#### Test Plan
<!-- How will this be tested prior to merging.-->
- [x] 💪 Manual
- [ ] ⚡ Unit test
- [ ] 💚 E2E
## Description
Don't populate users when GraphConnector instance is created
## Does this PR need a docs update or release note?
- [x] ✅ Yes, it's included
- [ ] 🕐 Yes, but in a later PR
- [ ] ⛔ No
## Type of change
- [ ] 🌻 Feature
- [ ] 🐛 Bugfix
- [ ] 🗺️ Documentation
- [ ] 🤖 Test
- [ ] 💻 CI/Deployment
- [x] 🧹 Tech Debt/Cleanup
## Issue(s)
* #1994
## Test Plan
- [x] 💪 Manual
- [x] ⚡ Unit test
- [ ] 💚 E2E
## Does this PR need a docs update or release note?
- [ ] ⛔ No
## Type of change
- [x] 🧹 Tech Debt/Cleanup
## Issue(s)
* #1970
## Test Plan
- [x] ⚡ Unit test
- [x] 💚 E2E
## Does this PR need a docs update or release note?
- [x] ⛔ No
## Type of change
- [x] 🧹 Tech Debt/Cleanup
## Issue(s)
* #1970
## Test Plan
- [x] ⚡ Unit test
- [x] 💚 E2E
## Description
Make a separate interface for fetching drive information from Graph API. Interface allows for better testing via mocks
Merges SharePoint and OneDrive code for getting drives.
Also fixes potential bug where not all drives would be fetched. This could have occurred because the previous implementation for both SharePoint and OneDrive were not checking for paginated results
Viewing by commit is recommended
## Does this PR need a docs update or release note?
- [x] ✅ Yes, it's included
- [ ] 🕐 Yes, but in a later PR
- [ ] ⛔ No
## Type of change
- [ ] 🌻 Feature
- [ ] 🐛 Bugfix
- [ ] 🗺️ Documentation
- [x] 🤖 Test
- [ ] 💻 CI/Deployment
- [x] 🧹 Tech Debt/Cleanup
## Issue(s)
* #2264
## Test Plan
- [ ] 💪 Manual
- [x] ⚡ Unit test
- [ ] 💚 E2E
## Description
A couple minor refactors. First, combines the
graph/service_helper.go and graph/service.go
files into a single file (just lift'n'shift, no logic
changes). Second, renames CreateHTTPClient
to just HTTPClient. Third, replaces the new
LargeItemClient constructor with extensible
options for the http client, starting with a
NoTimeout option. This will provide longer
term maintenance over multiple constructors.
This change sets up QoL for building multiple services
and clients within api layer handlers, which will appear
in an immediately following PR.
## Does this PR need a docs update or release note?
- [x] ⛔ No
## Type of change
- [x] 🧹 Tech Debt/Cleanup
## Issue(s)
* #2299
## Test Plan
- [x] ⚡ Unit test
- [x] 💚 E2E
## Description
This PR reintroduces the changes from #2266 with a change to *not* reset the transport
when initializing the shared client.
Doing so was removing the retry and other middlewares
and also resulting in throttled requests being masked as success
Also - we now decorate our download traffic with an ISV tag as recommended [here](https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/sharepoint/dev/general-development/how-to-avoid-getting-throttled-or-blocked-in-sharepoint-online#how-to-decorate-your-http-traffic)
## Does this PR need a docs update or release note?
- [ ] ✅ Yes, it's included
- [x] 🕐 Yes, but in a later PR
- [ ] ⛔ No
## Type of change
<!--- Please check the type of change your PR introduces: --->
- [ ] 🌻 Feature
- [x] 🐛 Bugfix
- [ ] 🗺️ Documentation
- [ ] 🤖 Test
- [ ] 💻 CI/Deployment
- [ ] 🧹 Tech Debt/Cleanup
## Issue(s)
<!-- Can reference multiple issues. Use one of the following "magic words" - "closes, fixes" to auto-close the Github issue. -->
* #2266
## Test Plan
<!-- How will this be tested prior to merging.-->
- [ ] 💪 Manual
- [ ] ⚡ Unit test
- [x] 💚 E2E
## Description
onedrive currently constructs a new http client
for every file it downloads. This causes the OS
to generate extra sockets, and hang onto them
after the download is complete. Replacing these
one-off clients with a singular, re-used client-
which is the behavior and standard suggested
for golang http clients- minimizes system
resource consumption.
## Does this PR need a docs update or release note?
- [x] ⛔ No
## Type of change
- [x] 🐛 Bugfix
## Issue(s)
* closes#2262
## Test Plan
- [x] 💪 Manual
- [x] ⚡ Unit test
- [x] 💚 E2E
## Description
Relocates the graphService struct to graph as
the Service struct. Replaces GC's embedded
graphService with a graph.Servicer reference.
## Type of change
- [x] 🐹 Trivial/Minor
## Issue(s)
* #1725
## Test Plan
- [x] ⚡ Unit test
- [x] 💚 E2E
## Description
`graph.Service -> graph.Servicer`, no other changes.
More compliant with golang naming standards,
and will allow us to eventually migrate the
Service struct out of connector and into graph.
## Type of change
- [x] 🐹 Trivial/Minor
## Issue(s)
* #1725
## Description
Adds a lookup for all tenant site ids when a new
graph connector is created. Also adds an enum
to flag which resource set (users, sites, or all)
that the connector should initialize.
## Type of change
- [x] 🌻 Feature
## Issue(s)
* #1506
## Test Plan
- [x] 💚 E2E
## Description
Now that pwsh scripts do the purging, we can
get rid of the faultier graphapi exchange purge
code, along with the functions supporting it.
## Type of change
- [x] 🤖 Test
## Issue(s)
* #1520
## Test Plan
- [x] 💪 Manual
## Description
Swap from GraphAPI-based data cleanup (which doesn't allow
us to access hidden folders like Audit retention or delete-restoration)
to powershell script-based cleanup (which allows us to make
SOAP requests against legacy exchange apis).
## Type of change
- [x] 🐛 Bugfix
- [x] 🤖 Test
## Issue(s)
* #1266
## Test Plan
- [x] 💪 Manual
- [x] 💚 E2E
## Description
The secondary scripts in corso (factory, purge, etc) are not currently flushing their logs if an error occurrs since os.Exit(1) kills the current process without alloting time for deferred funcs to run.
## Type of change
- [x] 🐛 Bugfix
## Issue(s)
* #902
## Test Plan
- [x] 💚 E2E
## Description
Load tests fail on the post-test cleanup using the purge script,
but are not currently logging the cause. Local repro has not
been successful. This change adds additional error logging
output for review in case of failure.
## Type of change
- [x] 🤖 Test
## Issue(s)
* #902
## Test Plan
- [x] 💪 Manual
## Description
purge.go to use the ContainerResolvers to collect containers from the Graph Connector.
NOTE: CollectFolders in service_query.go unchanged. `CollectFolderrs()` is stubbed for another PR. This will reduce the amount of line changes to be used in the future.
<!-- Insert PR description-->
## Type of change
- [x] 🐛 Bugfix
## Issue(s)
<!-- Can reference multiple issues. Use one of the following "magic words" - "closes, fixes" to auto-close the Github issue. -->
*closes #1189<issue>
## Test Plan
- [x] ⚡ Unit test
## Description
migrates the client_id, client_secret, and tenant_id
environment variables to versions prepended with
azure_*.
⚠️ Your local environment will need to change in the following ways: ⚠️
1. prepend `AZURE_` to your clientID, clientSecret, and tenantID env vars.
2. update those same env references in any `.corso.env` files used for copying envs to docker containers.
3. in `.corso.toml` (and any variants such as .corso_test.toml), replace `tenantid` with `azure_tenantid`.
## Type of change
- [x] 🐹 Trivial/Minor
## Issue(s)
* #558
## Test Plan
- [x] 💪 Manual
- [x] ⚡ Unit test
- [x] 💚 E2E
## Description
Adds scripted production of mock emails for building out
large/rolling datasets for load testing.
## Type of change
- [x] 🌻 Feature
- [x] 🤖 Test
## Issue(s)
* #902
## Test Plan
- [x] 💪 Manual
