corso has a thousand bespoke approaches to setting the same info in all of its tests. This is a first step towards minimizing and standardizing the lift around that work. Future PRs will distribute these packages through the repo.
---
#### Does this PR need a docs update or release note?
- [x] ⛔ No
#### Type of change
- [x] 🤖 Supportability/Tests
- [x] 🧹 Tech Debt/Cleanup
#### Test Plan
- [x] ⚡ Unit test
- [x] 💚 E2E
reverses the drive backup process toggle by making the tree-based backup standard, and the old, linear enumeration the toggleable fallback.
---
#### Does this PR need a docs update or release note?
- [x] ⛔ No
#### Type of change
- [x] 🌻 Feature
#### Issue(s)
* #4690
#### Test Plan
- [x] ⚡ Unit test
- [x] 💚 E2E
Functions help check things like
* are two items equal when taking into account nil, empty slices, and
other zero-values?
* is something fully populated?
---
#### Does this PR need a docs update or release note?
- [ ] ✅ Yes, it's included
- [ ] 🕐 Yes, but in a later PR
- [x] ⛔ No
#### Type of change
- [ ] 🌻 Feature
- [ ] 🐛 Bugfix
- [ ] 🗺️ Documentation
- [x] 🤖 Supportability/Tests
- [ ] 💻 CI/Deployment
- [ ] 🧹 Tech Debt/Cleanup
#### Test Plan
- [x] 💪 Manual
- [ ] ⚡ Unit test
- [ ] 💚 E2E
<!-- PR description-->
AddDisableLazyItemReader disables lazy item reader, such that we fall
back to prefetch reader. This flag is currently only meant for groups
conversations backup. Although it can be utilized for other services
in future.
This flag should only be used if lazy item reader is the default choice
and we want to fallback to prefetch reader.
---
#### Does this PR need a docs update or release note?
- [ ] ✅ Yes, it's included
- [ ] 🕐 Yes, but in a later PR
- [x] ⛔ No
#### Type of change
<!--- Please check the type of change your PR introduces: --->
- [ ] 🌻 Feature
- [ ] 🐛 Bugfix
- [ ] 🗺️ Documentation
- [x] 🤖 Supportability/Tests
- [ ] 💻 CI/Deployment
- [ ] 🧹 Tech Debt/Cleanup
#### Issue(s)
<!-- Can reference multiple issues. Use one of the following "magic words" - "closes, fixes" to auto-close the Github issue. -->
* https://github.com/alcionai/corso/issues/4862
#### Test Plan
<!-- How will this be tested prior to merging.-->
- [ ] 💪 Manual
- [x] ⚡ Unit test
- [ ] 💚 E2E
We're currently passing some backup options during repo connect which
complicates how SDK users can connect to a corso repo. This PR starts
to lay the groundwork for passing a discrete set of config parameters
to backup operations
This PR adds a test around config values passed into the
NewBackupOperation function. It checks that the config values stored
in the backup operation match what's passed in. It also makes sure
the passed in config parameters have all non-zero values so that
future changes don't silently pass the test when they shouldn't
---
#### Does this PR need a docs update or release note?
- [ ] ✅ Yes, it's included
- [ ] 🕐 Yes, but in a later PR
- [x] ⛔ No
#### Type of change
- [ ] 🌻 Feature
- [ ] 🐛 Bugfix
- [ ] 🗺️ Documentation
- [x] 🤖 Supportability/Tests
- [ ] 💻 CI/Deployment
- [ ] 🧹 Tech Debt/Cleanup
#### Test Plan
- [x] 💪 Manual
- [ ] ⚡ Unit test
- [ ] 💚 E2E
This completes the wiring for Exchange preview backups. A few notable
points:
* Adds new config substruct(?) for limits on items/data
* Adds "reasonable defaults" (very small) for Exchange data categories
* Adds "important" and "skip" containers for Exchange data categories
All the above can be tweaked as we determine what values work best
Manually tested
1. regular backup
2. preview backup
3. regular backup
Verified that no merge base is used for the preview backup and the
merge base made in (1) is used for the backup in (3)
This feature is not exposed via CLI
May be easiest to review by commit
---
#### Does this PR need a docs update or release note?
- [ ] ✅ Yes, it's included
- [ ] 🕐 Yes, but in a later PR
- [x] ⛔ No
#### Type of change
- [x] 🌻 Feature
- [ ] 🐛 Bugfix
- [ ] 🗺️ Documentation
- [ ] 🤖 Supportability/Tests
- [ ] 💻 CI/Deployment
- [ ] 🧹 Tech Debt/Cleanup
#### Issues
Merge after:
* #4657
* #4607
#### Test Plan
- [x] 💪 Manual
- [x] ⚡ Unit test
- [ ] 💚 E2E
Increase proliferation of the count bus to record runtime stats.
---
#### Does this PR need a docs update or release note?
- [x] ⛔ No
#### Type of change
- [x] 🤖 Supportability/Tests
#### Test Plan
- [x] ⚡ Unit test
- [x] 💚 E2E
Enable user/client to be able to perform multiple backups in a concurrent manner irrespective of storage provider (s3/filesystem) for different tenants (anything that differentiates one account from another).
#### Does this PR need a docs update or release note?
- [ ] ✅ Yes, it's included
- [x] 🕐 Yes, but in a later PR
- [ ] ⛔ No
#### Type of change
- [ ] 🌻 Feature
- [x] 🐛 Bugfix
- [ ] 🗺️ Documentation
- [ ] 🤖 Supportability/Tests
- [ ] 💻 CI/Deployment
- [ ] 🧹 Tech Debt/Cleanup
#### Issue(s)
* #4443
#### Test Plan
<!-- How will this be tested prior to merging.-->
- [x] 💪 Manual
- [x] ⚡ Unit test
- [x] 💚 E2E
1. moves the m365/graph package from internal to pkg/services/api so that options are accessible to sdk users.
2. exposes graph.Options in the api client.Service call.
---
#### Does this PR need a docs update or release note?
- [x] ⛔ No
#### Type of change
- [x] 🌻 Feature
<!-- PR description-->
With #4497 changes, any counters that we log in graph middlewares ( e.g. `APICallTokensConsumed` or `ThrottledAPICalls`) will no longer show up in `BackupOperation.Results.Counts`.
This is because graph adapters and backup operation will be initialized with different count busses. Since the backup result counts are captured from the operation bus, we will lose out on any graph metrics captured in middleware layers. This PR unifies the busses.
Ill also add a regression check for graph metrics shortly
---
#### Does this PR need a docs update or release note?
- [ ] ✅ Yes, it's included
- [ ] 🕐 Yes, but in a later PR
- [x] ⛔ No
#### Type of change
<!--- Please check the type of change your PR introduces: --->
- [ ] 🌻 Feature
- [x] 🐛 Bugfix
- [ ] 🗺️ Documentation
- [ ] 🤖 Supportability/Tests
- [ ] 💻 CI/Deployment
- [ ] 🧹 Tech Debt/Cleanup
#### Issue(s)
<!-- Can reference multiple issues. Use one of the following "magic words" - "closes, fixes" to auto-close the Github issue. -->
* #<issue>
#### Test Plan
<!-- How will this be tested prior to merging.-->
- [x] 💪 Manual
- [ ] ⚡ Unit test
- [ ] 💚 E2E
Add an option to request a preview backup and tag the resulting backup
as a preview if the flag is set. Preview backups must complete
successfully with no errors in order to be tagged
This does not update the item selection logic, so right now preview
backups will contain all items that normal backups do. Item selection
will be refined in upcoming PRs
---
#### Does this PR need a docs update or release note?
- [ ] ✅ Yes, it's included
- [ ] 🕐 Yes, but in a later PR
- [x] ⛔ No
#### Type of change
- [x] 🌻 Feature
- [ ] 🐛 Bugfix
- [ ] 🗺️ Documentation
- [ ] 🤖 Supportability/Tests
- [ ] 💻 CI/Deployment
- [ ] 🧹 Tech Debt/Cleanup
#### Test Plan
- [ ] 💪 Manual
- [ ] ⚡ Unit test
- [x] 💚 E2E
#### Does this PR need a docs update or release note?
- [x] ⛔ No
#### Type of change
- [x] 🧹 Tech Debt/Cleanup
#### Test Plan
- [x] ⚡ Unit test
- [x] 💚 E2E
Update the BackupBases API to return BackupBase
structs that contain both the snapshot and backup
model instead of having separate functions for
each. Minor logic updates to accommodate these
changes
This PR also updates tests and mock code for the
new API
Suggest viewing by commit
---
#### Does this PR need a docs update or release note?
- [ ] ✅ Yes, it's included
- [ ] 🕐 Yes, but in a later PR
- [x] ⛔ No
#### Type of change
- [ ] 🌻 Feature
- [ ] 🐛 Bugfix
- [ ] 🗺️ Documentation
- [ ] 🤖 Supportability/Tests
- [ ] 💻 CI/Deployment
- [x] 🧹 Tech Debt/Cleanup
#### Issue(s)
* closes#3943
#### Test Plan
- [ ] 💪 Manual
- [x] ⚡ Unit test
- [x] 💚 E2E
uses the count bus in the kopia backup package.
This currently duplicates counts that we're getting
from the kopia stats. A later pr will remove the old
stats entirely in favor of the counter.
---
#### Does this PR need a docs update or release note?
- [x] ⛔ No
#### Type of change
- [x] 🧹 Tech Debt/Cleanup
#### Test Plan
- [x] ⚡ Unit test
- [x] 💚 E2E
Move the Reasoner implementation from the kopia package to the identity
package. This will help avoid import cycles if we want to start
persisting Reason information in the backup model.
---
#### Does this PR need a docs update or release note?
- [ ] ✅ Yes, it's included
- [ ] 🕐 Yes, but in a later PR
- [x] ⛔ No
#### Type of change
- [ ] 🌻 Feature
- [ ] 🐛 Bugfix
- [ ] 🗺️ Documentation
- [x] 🤖 Supportability/Tests
- [ ] 💻 CI/Deployment
- [ ] 🧹 Tech Debt/Cleanup
#### Test Plan
- [ ] 💪 Manual
- [x] ⚡ Unit test
- [x] 💚 E2E
<!-- PR description-->
One of the 2 remaining setup PRs before we can introduce local storage repos.
**Changes:**
1. Read storage provider(`provider`) from config file except for `repo init * ` or `repo connect *` commands.
2. Apply flag overrides based on provider type( e.g. `S3FlagOverrides` if provider is `S3`)
3. Propagate storage provider type to functions which read/write config. These functions arbitrate on config hierarchy - flags, env, config file, in that order.
**Reasons**
* Reason 1 is needed is because config file is the source of truth for storage provider for all commands except `repo init` or `repo connect`. In the exception cases, we pick the provider in command (e.g. `s3`) as the source of truth. e.g. consider a `repo init s3`, followed by `repo init filesystem`.During `repo init filesystem`, config file would indicate `S3` provider, but the correct behavior here is to select `filesystem` provider.
* One alternative was to push provider from the init/connect cmds into an override flag, and let the config code decide on hierarchy. However, this felt hacky. provider here is not a flag to begin with. It's part of init/connect commands.
---
#### Does this PR need a docs update or release note?
- [ ] ✅ Yes, it's included
- [x] 🕐 Yes, but in a later PR
- [ ] ⛔ No
#### Type of change
<!--- Please check the type of change your PR introduces: --->
- [ ] 🌻 Feature
- [ ] 🐛 Bugfix
- [ ] 🗺️ Documentation
- [ ] 🤖 Supportability/Tests
- [ ] 💻 CI/Deployment
- [x] 🧹 Tech Debt/Cleanup
#### Issue(s)
<!-- Can reference multiple issues. Use one of the following "magic words" - "closes, fixes" to auto-close the Github issue. -->
* https://github.com/alcionai/corso/issues/1416
#### Test Plan
<!-- How will this be tested prior to merging.-->
- [x] 💪 Manual
- [ ] ⚡ Unit test
- [ ] 💚 E2E
<!-- PR description-->
---
#### Does this PR need a docs update or release note?
- [ ] ✅ Yes, it's included
- [ ] 🕐 Yes, but in a later PR
- [x] ⛔ No
#### Type of change
<!--- Please check the type of change your PR introduces: --->
- [x] 🌻 Feature
- [ ] 🐛 Bugfix
- [ ] 🗺️ Documentation
- [ ] 🤖 Supportability/Tests
- [ ] 💻 CI/Deployment
- [ ] 🧹 Tech Debt/Cleanup
#### Issue(s)
<!-- Can reference multiple issues. Use one of the following "magic words" - "closes, fixes" to auto-close the Github issue. -->
* https://github.com/alcionai/corso/issues/3990
#### Test Plan
<!-- How will this be tested prior to merging.-->
- [ ] 💪 Manual
- [x] ⚡ Unit test
- [ ] 💚 E2E
updaing the path package to the current naming convention. No logic changes.
---
#### Does this PR need a docs update or release note?
- [x] ⛔ No
#### Type of change
- [x] 🧹 Tech Debt/Cleanup
#### Test Plan
- [x] ⚡ Unit test
- [x] 💚 E2E
enables nightly cli e2e tests, operations layer integration tests, and sanity tests for groups and teams.
---
#### Does this PR need a docs update or release note?
- [x] ⛔ No
#### Type of change
- [x] 🤖 Supportability/Tests
#### Issue(s)
* #3989
#### Test Plan
- [x] ⚡ Unit test
- [x] 💚 E2E
Not sure if we wanna merge it as it might generate way too many conflicts, but this should help us add a linter in CI. If we are good, I'll add something that can do lints for this in a follow up PR.
Super hacky, but this fix was created using `while true ; do tree-grepper -q go '(argument_list "," @nope .)' | tail -n1| awk -F: "{print \$1,\"+\"\$2\" -c ':norm \$xJZZ'\"}" | xargs vim ; done`.
---
#### Does this PR need a docs update or release note?
- [ ] ✅ Yes, it's included
- [ ] 🕐 Yes, but in a later PR
- [ ] ⛔ No
#### Type of change
<!--- Please check the type of change your PR introduces: --->
- [ ] 🌻 Feature
- [ ] 🐛 Bugfix
- [ ] 🗺️ Documentation
- [ ] 🤖 Supportability/Tests
- [ ] 💻 CI/Deployment
- [ ] 🧹 Tech Debt/Cleanup
#### Issue(s)
<!-- Can reference multiple issues. Use one of the following "magic words" - "closes, fixes" to auto-close the Github issue. -->
* https://github.com/alcionai/corso/issues/3654
#### Test Plan
<!-- How will this be tested prior to merging.-->
- [ ] 💪 Manual
- [ ] ⚡ Unit test
- [ ] 💚 E2E
just a QoL shorthand to match the Build func.
---
#### Does this PR need a docs update or release note?
- [x] ⛔ No
#### Type of change
- [x] 🧹 Tech Debt/Cleanup
#### Test Plan
- [x] ⚡ Unit test
- [=x] 💚 E2E
<!-- PR description-->
1. Renamed `IsBackupRunnable` to `IsServiceEnabled` & extended to restore operation. Removed `checkServiceEnabled`. Reasons:
- The above 2 functions were doing the same thing. Removed `checkServiceEnabled` in favor of `IsBackupRunnable` since we want this check to be as soon as possible during backup/restore op initialization
- Renamed `IsBackupRunnable` to `IsServiceEnabled`, because a) we are only doing service enabled checks right now, b) common code that can be used for both restore & backup.
2. Wire corso code to use new helpers in internal/m365/common.go
3. Note: SDK wiring and related integ tests will be added in a follow up PR
---
#### Does this PR need a docs update or release note?
- [ ] ✅ Yes, it's included
- [ ] 🕐 Yes, but in a later PR
- [x] ⛔ No
#### Type of change
<!--- Please check the type of change your PR introduces: --->
- [ ] 🌻 Feature
- [ ] 🐛 Bugfix
- [ ] 🗺️ Documentation
- [ ] 🤖 Supportability/Tests
- [ ] 💻 CI/Deployment
- [x] 🧹 Tech Debt/Cleanup
#### Issue(s)
<!-- Can reference multiple issues. Use one of the following "magic words" - "closes, fixes" to auto-close the Github issue. -->
* https://github.com/alcionai/corso/issues/3844
#### Test Plan
<!-- How will this be tested prior to merging.-->
- [ ] 💪 Manual
- [x] ⚡ Unit test
- [ ] 💚 E2E
This adds a `MetadataPathPrefix` func to any drive related handlers. And in case of exchange, we will create a path. These generated paths, in both scenario is what now gets passed to `MakeMetadataCollection` instead of passing the different values.
<!-- PR description-->
---
#### Does this PR need a docs update or release note?
- [ ] ✅ Yes, it's included
- [ ] 🕐 Yes, but in a later PR
- [x] ⛔ No
#### Type of change
<!--- Please check the type of change your PR introduces: --->
- [ ] 🌻 Feature
- [ ] 🐛 Bugfix
- [ ] 🗺️ Documentation
- [ ] 🤖 Supportability/Tests
- [ ] 💻 CI/Deployment
- [x] 🧹 Tech Debt/Cleanup
#### Issue(s)
<!-- Can reference multiple issues. Use one of the following "magic words" - "closes, fixes" to auto-close the Github issue. -->
* https://github.com/alcionai/corso/issues/4154
#### Test Plan
<!-- How will this be tested prior to merging.-->
- [ ] 💪 Manual
- [x] ⚡ Unit test
- [x] 💚 E2E
Shuffle around some logic for details merging so that
we always attempt to extract a LocationRef from the
backup base entry that's currently being examined.
A LocationRef should always be available from either
the LocationRef field in the details entry (newer
backups) or by extracting it from the RepoRef (older
backups)
Manually tested incremental backups for exchange in
the following scenarios:
1. v0.3.0 backup (calendars use IDs in RepoRef) ->
incremental with this patch -> incremental with
this patch
1. v0.2.0 backup (exchange uses folder names in
RepoRef) -> incremental with this patch ->
incremental with this patch
The above tests should cover the cases where:
* base backup details don't have LocationRef for
exchange items
* base backup details have LocationRef for exchange
items
---
#### Does this PR need a docs update or release note?
- [ ] ✅ Yes, it's included
- [ ] 🕐 Yes, but in a later PR
- [x] ⛔ No
#### Type of change
- [ ] 🌻 Feature
- [ ] 🐛 Bugfix
- [ ] 🗺️ Documentation
- [ ] 🤖 Supportability/Tests
- [ ] 💻 CI/Deployment
- [x] 🧹 Tech Debt/Cleanup
#### Issue(s)
* closes#3716
#### Test Plan
- [x] 💪 Manual
- [x] ⚡ Unit test
- [ ] 💚 E2E
A Stream is a continuous transmission of data.
An item is a single structure. Crossing the two
definitions generates confusion.
Primarily code movement/renaming. Though there
is also some reduction/replacement of structs
where we'd made a variety of testable Item implementations
instead of re-using the generic mock.
---
#### Does this PR need a docs update or release note?
- [x] ⛔ No
#### Type of change
- [x] 🧹 Tech Debt/Cleanup
#### Test Plan
- [x] ⚡ Unit test
- [x] 💚 E2E
No longer required by SDK users and not exposed directly to CLI users unless they're looking at the JSON output from details. This field is not documented anywhere though so there's no guarantees that we technically need to uphold with it.
Manually tested:
* restoring from a backup that had this field
* making a fresh backup without this field when the merge base did have this field
---
#### Does this PR need a docs update or release note?
- [ ] ✅ Yes, it's included
- [ ] 🕐 Yes, but in a later PR
- [x] ⛔ No
#### Type of change
- [ ] 🌻 Feature
- [ ] 🐛 Bugfix
- [ ] 🗺️ Documentation
- [ ] 🤖 Supportability/Tests
- [ ] 💻 CI/Deployment
- [x] 🧹 Tech Debt/Cleanup
#### Issue(s)
* closes#3986
#### Test Plan
- [x] 💪 Manual
- [x] ⚡ Unit test
- [x] 💚 E2E
Remove references to the kopia package from
`pkg/store` package so that kopia can import
that package itself. Do this by using
interfaces where needed in `pkg/store`
instead of concrete struct types
These changes will make cleaning up
incomplete backups a little neater since
that code will need to lookup both
manifests and backup models
This PR is just minor renaming and fixups,
no logic changes
---
#### Does this PR need a docs update or release note?
- [ ] ✅ Yes, it's included
- [ ] 🕐 Yes, but in a later PR
- [x] ⛔ No
#### Type of change
- [ ] 🌻 Feature
- [ ] 🐛 Bugfix
- [ ] 🗺️ Documentation
- [ ] 🤖 Supportability/Tests
- [ ] 💻 CI/Deployment
- [x] 🧹 Tech Debt/Cleanup
#### Issue(s)
* #3217
#### Test Plan
- [ ] 💪 Manual
- [x] ⚡ Unit test
- [x] 💚 E2E
Only code movement, no code changes.
Moved services to `/internal/m365/services/{onedrive,sharepoint,exchange}`
Moved collections to `/internal/m365/collection/{drive,site}`
---
#### Does this PR need a docs update or release note?
- [ ] ✅ Yes, it's included
- [ ] 🕐 Yes, but in a later PR
- [x] ⛔ No
#### Type of change
<!--- Please check the type of change your PR introduces: --->
- [ ] 🌻 Feature
- [ ] 🐛 Bugfix
- [ ] 🗺️ Documentation
- [ ] 🤖 Supportability/Tests
- [ ] 💻 CI/Deployment
- [x] 🧹 Tech Debt/Cleanup
#### Issue(s)
<!-- Can reference multiple issues. Use one of the following "magic words" - "closes, fixes" to auto-close the Github issue. -->
* #<issue>
#### Test Plan
<!-- How will this be tested prior to merging.-->
- [ ] 💪 Manual
- [ ] ⚡ Unit test
- [ ] 💚 E2E
<!-- PR description-->
1. Tests which try out all combinations of failurePolicy vs fault errors
2. Incremental tests for deets propagation from assist/merge backups
---
#### Does this PR need a docs update or release note?
- [ ] ✅ Yes, it's included
- [ ] 🕐 Yes, but in a later PR
- [x] ⛔ No
#### Type of change
<!--- Please check the type of change your PR introduces: --->
- [ ] 🌻 Feature
- [ ] 🐛 Bugfix
- [ ] 🗺️ Documentation
- [x] 🤖 Supportability/Tests
- [ ] 💻 CI/Deployment
- [ ] 🧹 Tech Debt/Cleanup
#### Issue(s)
<!-- Can reference multiple issues. Use one of the following "magic words" - "closes, fixes" to auto-close the Github issue. -->
* #<issue>
#### Test Plan
<!-- How will this be tested prior to merging.-->
- [ ] 💪 Manual
- [ ] ⚡ Unit test
- [x] 💚 E2E
Update backup details merge logic to use assist
backup bases. As the modTime check is already in
DetailsMergeInfoer there's not much else to do
here besides wiring things up
Overall, this solution is an alternative to the
previous one. It works by placing all cached
items in the DetailsMergeInfoer instead of adding
them to details (assuming they had a details
entry)
During details merging, we can cycle through
all bases once and track only the items we've
added to details (so we don't duplicate things).
This works because we know precisely which items
we should be looking for
ModTime comparisons in the DetailsMergeInfoer
ensure we get the proper version of each item
details
**Note:** This requires a minor patch to how
we determine if it's safe to persist a backup
model because now backups won't produce details
entries for cached items until `mergeDetails`
runs
---
#### Does this PR need a docs update or release note?
- [ ] ✅ Yes, it's included
- [ ] 🕐 Yes, but in a later PR
- [x] ⛔ No
#### Type of change
- [x] 🌻 Feature
- [ ] 🐛 Bugfix
- [ ] 🗺️ Documentation
- [ ] 🤖 Supportability/Tests
- [ ] 💻 CI/Deployment
- [ ] 🧹 Tech Debt/Cleanup
#### Issue(s)
<!-- Can reference multiple issues. Use one of the following "magic words" - "closes, fixes" to auto-close the Github issue. -->
* #<issue>
#### Test Plan
- [ ] 💪 Manual
- [x] ⚡ Unit test
- [ ] 💚 E2E
Moves the kopia.Reasoner interface out of the
kopia package and into pkg/backup/identity.
No logical changes here, just renaming and movement.
---
#### Does this PR need a docs update or release note?
- [x] ⛔ No
#### Type of change
- [x] 🧹 Tech Debt/Cleanup
#### Issue(s)
* #3993
#### Test Plan
- [x] ⚡ Unit test
- [x] 💚 E2E
Add modTime as one of the things that the
DetailsMergeInfoer knows how to check against,
wire it into details merging, and populate it
during item upload
This will help merge assist backup base items
by allowing us to do a direct comparison on
modTimes if we add them to the
DetailsMergeInfoer during upload
---
#### Does this PR need a docs update or release note?
- [ ] ✅ Yes, it's included
- [ ] 🕐 Yes, but in a later PR
- [x] ⛔ No
#### Type of change
- [x] 🌻 Feature
- [ ] 🐛 Bugfix
- [ ] 🗺️ Documentation
- [ ] 🤖 Supportability/Tests
- [ ] 💻 CI/Deployment
- [ ] 🧹 Tech Debt/Cleanup
#### Issue(s)
<!-- Can reference multiple issues. Use one of the following "magic words" - "closes, fixes" to auto-close the Github issue. -->
* #<issue>
#### Test Plan
- [ ] 💪 Manual
- [x] ⚡ Unit test
- [ ] 💚 E2E
If the restore configuration specifies a protected resource as a restore target, use that as the destination for the restore. First step is to ensure the provided target can be retrieved and identified.
---
#### Does this PR need a docs update or release note?
- [x] 🕐 Yes, but in a later PR
#### Type of change
- [x] 🌻 Feature
#### Issue(s)
* #3562
#### Test Plan
- [x] ⚡ Unit test
Shift things so BackupBases is passed directly to
the kopia package which then extracts information
from it. This allows for fine-grained control
over kopia-assisted incremental bases and merge
bases. Generating subtree paths from Reasons is
also shifted to the kopia package
Also expands tests for better coverage of various
incremental backup situations
Viewing by commit may help and individual commit
comments usually contain reasons for changes,
especially for test removal
---
#### Does this PR need a docs update or release note?
- [ ] ✅ Yes, it's included
- [ ] 🕐 Yes, but in a later PR
- [x] ⛔ No
#### Type of change
- [ ] 🌻 Feature
- [ ] 🐛 Bugfix
- [ ] 🗺️ Documentation
- [ ] 🤖 Supportability/Tests
- [ ] 💻 CI/Deployment
- [x] 🧹 Tech Debt/Cleanup
#### Issue(s)
* #2068
#### Test Plan
- [x] 💪 Manual
- [x] ⚡ Unit test
- [x] 💚 E2E
allows cli users to limit the page size of delta queries by calling a new hidden flag: --delta-page-size.
This also adds the control.Options struct to the api client, so that configurations such as this can be easily handed into, and used by, the client.
---
#### Does this PR need a docs update or release note?
- [x] ⛔ No
#### Type of change
- [x] 🌻 Feature
#### Test Plan
- [x] 💪 Manual
- [x] ⚡ Unit test
- [x] 💚 E2E
Move tag generation from the backup op to the
kopia package. This makes it match the pattern
that finding base backups uses where a set of
Reasons and a separate set of additional tags
are provided
---
#### Does this PR need a docs update or release note?
- [ ] ✅ Yes, it's included
- [ ] 🕐 Yes, but in a later PR
- [x] ⛔ No
#### Type of change
- [ ] 🌻 Feature
- [ ] 🐛 Bugfix
- [ ] 🗺️ Documentation
- [ ] 🤖 Supportability/Tests
- [ ] 💻 CI/Deployment
- [x] 🧹 Tech Debt/Cleanup
#### Issue(s)
* #2360
#### Test Plan
- [x] 💪 Manual
- [x] ⚡ Unit test
- [x] 💚 E2E
Intermediate step to a few different goals including
* moving interface definitions to better locations while avoid cycles
* adding a flag to disable kopia-assisted incrementals
Create an interface and implementation for the existing Reason
struct. The goal is to set stuff up so that eventually the kopia
package can ask the struct for the subtree path to work with
when merging the hierarchy instead of having the backup operation
pass that information in
Code changes are mostly just turning stuff into a struct and
fixing up compile errors. Some functions have been excluded from
the struct (i.e. `Key`) and made into functions in the kopia
package itself
---
#### Does this PR need a docs update or release note?
- [ ] ✅ Yes, it's included
- [ ] 🕐 Yes, but in a later PR
- [x] ⛔ No
#### Type of change
- [ ] 🌻 Feature
- [ ] 🐛 Bugfix
- [ ] 🗺️ Documentation
- [ ] 🤖 Supportability/Tests
- [ ] 💻 CI/Deployment
- [x] 🧹 Tech Debt/Cleanup
#### Issue(s)
* #2360
#### Test Plan
- [ ] 💪 Manual
- [x] ⚡ Unit test
- [x] 💚 E2E
This is primarily an exercise in reducing the number of circular imports we get from adding the tester package to other packages.
No logic changes. Purely movement/renaming.
---
#### Does this PR need a docs update or release note?
- [x] ⛔ No
#### Type of change
- [x] 🤖 Supportability/Tests
#### Test Plan
- [x] ⚡ Unit test
- [x] 💚 E2E
Moves operations integration backup tests into a
subpackage, and slices up the test folder into
multiple, service specific folders.
No logic changes, only code copy-pasting and
renaming.
---
#### Does this PR need a docs update or release note?
- [x] ⛔ No
#### Type of change
- [x] 🤖 Supportability/Tests
#### Test Plan
- [x] 💚 E2E
Now that BackupBases defines functions, leverage them
in other code to reduce the number of times we fetch
Backup models and leverage the stronger invariants
the new FindBases function has
---
#### Does this PR need a docs update or release note?
- [ ] ✅ Yes, it's included
- [ ] 🕐 Yes, but in a later PR
- [x] ⛔ No
#### Type of change
- [ ] 🌻 Feature
- [ ] 🐛 Bugfix
- [ ] 🗺️ Documentation
- [ ] 🤖 Supportability/Tests
- [ ] 💻 CI/Deployment
- [x] 🧹 Tech Debt/Cleanup
#### Issue(s)
* #3525
#### Test Plan
- [ ] 💪 Manual
- [x] ⚡ Unit test
- [ ] 💚 E2E
renames /internal/connector to /internal/m365. No logic changes in this PR. Only the dir rename, import renames, and one linter shadowing rename.
---
#### Does this PR need a docs update or release note?
- [x] ⛔ No
#### Type of change
- [x] 🧹 Tech Debt/Cleanup
#### Issue(s)
* #1996
#### Test Plan
- [x] ⚡ Unit test
- [x] 💚 E2E
setting up the drive api calls into files/spaces that will cascade naturally to the addition of an api client for users and sites. contains some partial implementation of these clients, which will get completed in the next pr.
---
#### Does this PR need a docs update or release note?
- [x] ⛔ No
#### Type of change
- [ ] 🧹 Tech Debt/Cleanup
#### Issue(s)
* #1996
#### Test Plan
- [x] ⚡ Unit test
- [x] 💚 E2E
Take the new base finder code, wrap it in
a thin wrapper and use it in place of the
previous way of finding base snapshots
This solution is not focused on efficiency
as it does result in looking up backup
models multiple times. It's more to get the
new way of finding bases out and then we
can go back and smooth things over when
we have the chance
---
#### Does this PR need a docs update or release note?
- [x] ✅ Yes, it's included
- [ ] 🕐 Yes, but in a later PR
- [ ] ⛔ No
#### Type of change
- [x] 🌻 Feature
- [ ] 🐛 Bugfix
- [ ] 🗺️ Documentation
- [ ] 🤖 Supportability/Tests
- [ ] 💻 CI/Deployment
- [ ] 🧹 Tech Debt/Cleanup
#### Issue(s)
* #3202
#### Test Plan
- [ ] 💪 Manual
- [x] ⚡ Unit test
- [x] 💚 E2E
<!-- PR description-->
Currently the backup output show,
- total backup size - size of files + size of metafiles
- no of files - no of files + no of metafile
With this change the output of backup command shows size of only files and count include only file count.
NOTE: all current three services results will be impacted here.
#### Does this PR need a docs update or release note?
- [ ] ✅ Yes, it's included
- [ ] 🕐 Yes, but in a later PR
- [x] ⛔ No
#### Type of change
<!--- Please check the type of change your PR introduces: --->
- [ ] 🐛 Bugfix
#### Issue(s)
<!-- Can reference multiple issues. Use one of the following "magic words" - "closes, fixes" to auto-close the Github issue. -->
* https://github.com/alcionai/corso/issues/3304
#### Test Plan
<!-- How will this be tested prior to merging.-->
- [x] 💪 Manual
- [ ] ⚡ Unit test
- [x] 💚 E2E
populate a "test_name" clues field in the
tester context, so that logs can be associated
with the calling test.
---
#### Does this PR need a docs update or release note?
- [x] ⛔ No
#### Type of change
- [x] 🤖 Supportability/Tests
#### Test Plan
- [x] ⚡ Unit test
- [x] 💚 E2E
#### Does this PR need a docs update or release note?
- [x] ⛔ No
#### Type of change
- [x] 🧹 Tech Debt/Cleanup
#### Test Plan
- [x] ⚡ Unit test
- [x] 💚 E2E
Begin expanding the restore logic to take a pair of
paths, one denoting the precise location of the item
in kopia and the other denoting the "restore location"
or path the item should be placed at during restore
This PR is not expected to change system functionality
at all
This is the first of 2 PRs to setup all the logic for
this. This PR does not handle properly merging
together multiple collections that have the same
restore location but different RepoRefs due to recent
updates to the kopia wrapper restore logic
---
#### Does this PR need a docs update or release note?
- [ ] ✅ Yes, it's included
- [ ] 🕐 Yes, but in a later PR
- [x] ⛔ No
#### Type of change
- [x] 🌻 Feature
- [ ] 🐛 Bugfix
- [ ] 🗺️ Documentation
- [ ] 🤖 Supportability/Tests
- [ ] 💻 CI/Deployment
- [ ] 🧹 Tech Debt/Cleanup
#### Issue(s)
* #3197
#### Test Plan
- [ ] 💪 Manual
- [x] ⚡ Unit test
- [ ] 💚 E2E
introduces a new type wrapping a nested map so that aggregation of globally excluded items in driveish services don't need to manage the map updates themselves.
---
#### Does this PR need a docs update or release note?
- [x] ⛔ No
#### Type of change
- [x] 🧹 Tech Debt/Cleanup
#### Issue(s)
* #2340
#### Test Plan
- [x] ⚡ Unit test
- [x] 💚 E2E
#### Does this PR need a docs update or release note?
- [x] ⛔ No
#### Type of change
- [x] 🧹 Tech Debt/Cleanup
#### Test Plan
- [x] ⚡ Unit test
- [x] 💚 E2E
The fetch paralellism checks and logs occur on
every item streamed from GC. This is a bit chatty,
and has been moved upstream in the process for
a more centralized behavior.
---
#### Does this PR need a docs update or release note?
- [x] ⛔ No
#### Type of change
- [x] 🧹 Tech Debt/Cleanup
#### Test Plan
- [x] 💪 Manual
- [x] ⚡ Unit test
