Basic validation checks that make sure maintenance and retention options are consistent with each other. This at least makes sure retention is either enabled and maintenance extends locks or nothing is locked at all.
Going to be part of a set of PRs for validating the kopia config
---
#### Does this PR need a docs update or release note?
- [ ] ✅ Yes, it's included
- [ ] 🕐 Yes, but in a later PR
- [x] ⛔ No
#### Type of change
- [x] 🌻 Feature
- [ ] 🐛 Bugfix
- [ ] 🗺️ Documentation
- [x] 🤖 Supportability/Tests
- [ ] 💻 CI/Deployment
- [ ] 🧹 Tech Debt/Cleanup
#### Test Plan
- [ ] 💪 Manual
- [x] ⚡ Unit test
- [ ] 💚 E2E
metadata is too much data to be useful to an end user, meanwhile err is getting clobbered.
before
```
Error: Unable to complete backup
Message: <nil>
Metadata:{"assist_bases":"0","backup_id":"40940295-3611-42fb-ac27-5b80691ba793","base_backup_id":"832fff09-4988-4a3e-a0d0-4e51b197ea14","can_use_metadata":"true","can_use_previous_backup":"true","categories":"[Chats]","clues_trace":"c3bbd0e6","collection_count":"2","disable_assist_backup":"false","incremental":"true","merge_bases":"1","repo_ref":"fb8afbaa-e94c-4ea5-8a8a-24aff04d7874/chats/311d2a89-4c80-4da4-86ef-a08d8d6f0f94/chats/19:311d2a89-4c80-4da4-86ef-a08d8d6f0f94_817c2506-de4a-4795-971e-371ea75a03ed@unq.gbl.spaces","resource_owner_id":"311d2a89-4c80-4da4-86ef-a08d8d6f0f94","resource_owner_name":"rfinders@10rqc2.onmicrosoft.com","resource_owner_selected":"rfinders@10rqc2.onmicrosoft.com","service":"service(5)","tenant_id":"fb8afbaa-e94c-4ea5-8a8a-24aff04d7874"}
```
after
```
Error: Unable to complete backup
Cause: running backup: merging details: merging merge backup base details: getting updated info for entry: getting previous item location: unable to extract LocationRef from RepoRef
```
---
#### Does this PR need a docs update or release note?
- [x] ⛔ No
#### Type of change
- [x] 🧹 Tech Debt/Cleanup
#### Test Plan
- [x] 💪 Manual
adds CI sanity test steps to github workflow
#### Does this PR need a docs update or release note?
- [x] ⛔ No
#### Type of change
<!--- Please check the type of change your PR introduces: --->
- [x] 💻 CI/Deployment
#### Issue(s)
#4754
#### Test Plan
<!-- How will this be tested prior to merging.-->
- [x] 💪 Manual
- [x] ⚡ Unit test
- [x] 💚 E2E
Internally kopia has the notion of a retention policy. This adds a pin to each snapshot that corso uses kopia to create so that those snapshots won't be subject to kopia's rentention policy. As we disable kopia's retention policy during repo init this just acts as another layer of security to ensure snapshots won't be deleted unexpectedly.
Note that this PR only applies to _new_ snapshots that corso creates.
It doesn't go back and pin older snapshots for already existing backups
---
#### Does this PR need a docs update or release note?
- [ ] ✅ Yes, it's included
- [ ] 🕐 Yes, but in a later PR
- [x] ⛔ No
#### Type of change
- [ ] 🌻 Feature
- [x] 🐛 Bugfix
- [ ] 🗺️ Documentation
- [ ] 🤖 Supportability/Tests
- [ ] 💻 CI/Deployment
- [ ] 🧹 Tech Debt/Cleanup
#### Test Plan
- [ ] 💪 Manual
- [x] ⚡ Unit test
- [ ] 💚 E2E
We've found that reducing the MinEpochDuration parameter in kopia
can reduce GET requests sent to the object store by a large amount
(>50% in some cases) for repos that run many backups each day
This PR updates the init repo code path to set this parameter to
8hrs instead of the default 24hrs to bring in some of those savings
---
#### Does this PR need a docs update or release note?
- [ ] ✅ Yes, it's included
- [ ] 🕐 Yes, but in a later PR
- [x] ⛔ No
#### Type of change
- [x] 🌻 Feature
- [ ] 🐛 Bugfix
- [ ] 🗺️ Documentation
- [ ] 🤖 Supportability/Tests
- [ ] 💻 CI/Deployment
- [ ] 🧹 Tech Debt/Cleanup
#### Test Plan
- [ ] 💪 Manual
- [x] ⚡ Unit test
- [ ] 💚 E2E
Adds the backup's data category to the cli output.
before:
```
ID Started At Duration Status Resource Owner
09e8d1e3-92d4-426d-9ca1-3cd063ce8bb9 2024-01-12T17:54:33Z 16.103569s Completed rfinders@10rqc2.onmicrosoft.com
893ef934-9403-4775-b667-09f77cd26e83 2024-01-12T17:55:22Z 5.66253s Completed rfinders@10rqc2.onmicrosoft.com
```
after:
```
ID Started at Duration Status Protected resource Data
09e8d1e3-92d4-426d-9ca1-3cd063ce8bb9 2024-01-12T17:54:33Z 16.103569s Completed rfinders@10rqc2.onmicrosoft.com Contacts,Emails,Events
893ef934-9403-4775-b667-09f77cd26e83 2024-01-12T17:55:22Z 5.66253s Completed rfinders@10rqc2.onmicrosoft.com Emails
```
---
#### Does this PR need a docs update or release note?
- [x] ⛔ No
#### Type of change
- [x] 🌻 Feature
#### Issue(s)
* #3748
#### Test Plan
- [x] 💪 Manual
- [x] ⚡ Unit test
<!-- PR description-->
---
#### Does this PR need a docs update or release note?
- [x] ✅ Yes, it's included
- [ ] 🕐 Yes, but in a later PR
- [ ] ⛔ No
#### Type of change
<!--- Please check the type of change your PR introduces: --->
- [ ] 🌻 Feature
- [x] 🐛 Bugfix
- [ ] 🗺️ Documentation
- [ ] 🤖 Supportability/Tests
- [ ] 💻 CI/Deployment
- [ ] 🧹 Tech Debt/Cleanup
#### Issue(s)
<!-- Can reference multiple issues. Use one of the following "magic words" - "closes, fixes" to auto-close the Github issue. -->
* fixes https://github.com/alcionai/corso/issues/5046
#### Test Plan
<!-- How will this be tested prior to merging.-->
- [ ] 💪 Manual
- [x] ⚡ Unit test
- [ ] 💚 E2E
<!-- PR description-->
Known issue, tracking in https://github.com/alcionai/corso/issues/4772
---
#### Does this PR need a docs update or release note?
- [ ] ✅ Yes, it's included
- [ ] 🕐 Yes, but in a later PR
- [x] ⛔ No
#### Type of change
<!--- Please check the type of change your PR introduces: --->
- [ ] 🌻 Feature
- [x] 🐛 Bugfix
- [ ] 🗺️ Documentation
- [ ] 🤖 Supportability/Tests
- [ ] 💻 CI/Deployment
- [ ] 🧹 Tech Debt/Cleanup
#### Issue(s)
<!-- Can reference multiple issues. Use one of the following "magic words" - "closes, fixes" to auto-close the Github issue. -->
* #<issue>
#### Test Plan
<!-- How will this be tested prior to merging.-->
- [ ] 💪 Manual
- [ ] ⚡ Unit test
- [ ] 💚 E2E
Minor optimization where we skip trying to find BackupBases if we know
we're going to end up dropping them anyway. This can save us from
loading all the kopia manifests only to discard the information we
pulled from them. Note that this optimization only kicks in for
backups that request no merge bases and no assist bases
("full backup")
Existing test coverage in `operations/manifests_test.go` ensures this
doesn't break base selection altogether
As this is an optimization we don't need to merge this PR if it seems
like it will make code maintenance more difficult going forward
---
#### Does this PR need a docs update or release note?
- [ ] ✅ Yes, it's included
- [ ] 🕐 Yes, but in a later PR
- [x] ⛔ No
#### Type of change
- [ ] 🌻 Feature
- [ ] 🐛 Bugfix
- [ ] 🗺️ Documentation
- [ ] 🤖 Supportability/Tests
- [ ] 💻 CI/Deployment
- [x] 🧹 Tech Debt/Cleanup
* #<issue>
#### Test Plan
- [ ] 💪 Manual
- [x] ⚡ Unit test
- [x] 💚 E2E
enables sharepoint lists `backup` and `export`.
`restore` is enabled via `--allow-lists-restore` flag and is hidden in
CLI. So that it can be sanity-tested.
#### Does this PR need a docs update or release note?
- [ ] ✅ Yes, it's included
- [x] 🕐 Yes, but in a later PR
- [ ] ⛔ No
#### Type of change
<!--- Please check the type of change your PR introduces: --->
- [ ] 🌻 Feature
- [ ] 🐛 Bugfix
- [ ] 🗺️ Documentation
- [ ] 🤖 Supportability/Tests
- [ ] 💻 CI/Deployment
- [x] 🧹 Tech Debt/Cleanup
#### Issue(s)
#4754
#### Test Plan
<!-- How will this be tested prior to merging.-->
- [x] 💪 Manual
- [x] ⚡ Unit test
- [x] 💚 E2E
<!-- PR description-->
* Expand inReplyTo property to additionally get the parent post contents. This will be persisted as part of post data.
* This additional data will be useful for building a reply tree if we decide to do in-order restore/export in future.
---
#### Does this PR need a docs update or release note?
- [ ] ✅ Yes, it's included
- [ ] 🕐 Yes, but in a later PR
- [x] ⛔ No
#### Type of change
<!--- Please check the type of change your PR introduces: --->
- [x] 🌻 Feature
- [ ] 🐛 Bugfix
- [ ] 🗺️ Documentation
- [ ] 🤖 Supportability/Tests
- [ ] 💻 CI/Deployment
- [ ] 🧹 Tech Debt/Cleanup
#### Issue(s)
<!-- Can reference multiple issues. Use one of the following "magic words" - "closes, fixes" to auto-close the Github issue. -->
* #<issue>
#### Test Plan
<!-- How will this be tested prior to merging.-->
- [ ] 💪 Manual
- [x] ⚡ Unit test
- [ ] 💚 E2E
Use unique info for the kopia snapshot source information to help
isolate snapshots for different resources from each other. This will
come in handy both for checkpoint snapshots and regular snapshots if
kopia's retention policy happens to look for things.
Integration tests for this probably won't pass until the next PR in
the series is merged into this PR
---
#### Does this PR need a docs update or release note?
- [ ] ✅ Yes, it's included
- [ ] 🕐 Yes, but in a later PR
- [x] ⛔ No
#### Type of change
- [ ] 🌻 Feature
- [x] 🐛 Bugfix
- [ ] 🗺️ Documentation
- [ ] 🤖 Supportability/Tests
- [ ] 💻 CI/Deployment
- [ ] 🧹 Tech Debt/Cleanup
#### Issue(s)
merge after:
* #5091
* #5092
#### Test Plan
- [ ] 💪 Manual
- [x] ⚡ Unit test
- [ ] 💚 E2E
Will be used in later PRs to help make long-running streamstore
snapshots safer to create if they ever go past the kopia checkpoint
interval
---
#### Does this PR need a docs update or release note?
- [ ] ✅ Yes, it's included
- [ ] 🕐 Yes, but in a later PR
- [x] ⛔ No
#### Type of change
- [x] 🌻 Feature
- [ ] 🐛 Bugfix
- [ ] 🗺️ Documentation
- [ ] 🤖 Supportability/Tests
- [ ] 💻 CI/Deployment
- [ ] 🧹 Tech Debt/Cleanup
#### Issue(s)
merge after:
* #5091
#### Test Plan
- [ ] 💪 Manual
- [ ] ⚡ Unit test
- [ ] 💚 E2E
Will also be used more in later PRs
---
#### Does this PR need a docs update or release note?
- [ ] ✅ Yes, it's included
- [ ] 🕐 Yes, but in a later PR
- [x] ⛔ No
#### Type of change
- [x] 🌻 Feature
- [ ] 🐛 Bugfix
- [ ] 🗺️ Documentation
- [ ] 🤖 Supportability/Tests
- [ ] 💻 CI/Deployment
- [ ] 🧹 Tech Debt/Cleanup
#### Test Plan
- [ ] 💪 Manual
- [x] ⚡ Unit test
- [ ] 💚 E2E
reverses the drive backup process toggle by making the tree-based backup standard, and the old, linear enumeration the toggleable fallback.
---
#### Does this PR need a docs update or release note?
- [x] ⛔ No
#### Type of change
- [x] 🌻 Feature
#### Issue(s)
* #4690
#### Test Plan
- [x] ⚡ Unit test
- [x] 💚 E2E
Switch from the `custom-query-params` kopia branch in the alcion org to
the `corsostaging` kopia branch. The `corsostaging` branch was just
updated to include recent changes from the upstream kopia repo. This
allows us to stop using our custom fork of minio because upstream kopia
has updated to the version that includes the change we need
---
#### Does this PR need a docs update or release note?
- [ ] ✅ Yes, it's included
- [ ] 🕐 Yes, but in a later PR
- [x] ⛔ No
#### Type of change
- [ ] 🌻 Feature
- [ ] 🐛 Bugfix
- [ ] 🗺️ Documentation
- [ ] 🤖 Supportability/Tests
- [ ] 💻 CI/Deployment
- [x] 🧹 Tech Debt/Cleanup
#### Test Plan
- [ ] 💪 Manual
- [x] ⚡ Unit test
- [x] 💚 E2E
generates test lists for CI sanity tests
#### Does this PR need a docs update or release note?
- [ ] ✅ Yes, it's included
- [ ] 🕐 Yes, but in a later PR
- [x] ⛔ No
#### Type of change
<!--- Please check the type of change your PR introduces: --->
- [ ] 🌻 Feature
- [ ] 🐛 Bugfix
- [ ] 🗺️ Documentation
- [x] 🤖 Supportability/Tests
- [ ] 💻 CI/Deployment
- [ ] 🧹 Tech Debt/Cleanup
#### Issue(s)
#4754
#### Test Plan
<!-- How will this be tested prior to merging.-->
- [x] 💪 Manual
- [x] ⚡ Unit test
- [x] 💚 E2E
adds local sanity tests for lists
for reference:
- `lists` do not have `folders` concept, they are directly created in a site. As a result cannot be restored to a different folder to test. Therefore they need to be created in adjacent to the 'backed-up' lists. Due to this there is a requirement of `SANITY_TEST_RESTORE_CONTAINER_PREFIX`. Using this, during restore check, this env-var is used to find restored lists.
- Similarly, `SANITY_TEST_SOURCE_CONTAINER` is also used a prefix matcher to filter created test lists
- When exported, lists are stored in local into the provided directory as `<SANITY_TEST_RESTORE_CONTAINER>/Lists/<list-id>/<list-id>.json`
should go in after:
- https://github.com/alcionai/corso/pull/5024
- https://github.com/alcionai/corso/pull/5026
#### Does this PR need a docs update or release note?
- [x] ⛔ No
#### Type of change
<!--- Please check the type of change your PR introduces: --->
- [x] 🤖 Supportability/Tests
#### Issue(s)
#4754
#### Test Plan
<!-- How will this be tested prior to merging.-->
- [x] 💪 Manual
- [x] ⚡ Unit test
- [x] 💚 E2E
- includes GetList in list restore handler
- includes GetListsByCollisionKey in list restore handler
- updates mock list restore handler
#### Does this PR need a docs update or release note?
- [x] ⛔ No
#### Type of change
<!--- Please check the type of change your PR introduces: --->
- [x] 🌻 Feature
#### Issue(s)
#4754
#### Test Plan
<!-- How will this be tested prior to merging.-->
- [x] 💪 Manual
- [x] ⚡ Unit test
- [x] 💚 E2E
<!-- PR description-->
Posts are always sent to the group email address, along with additional
recipients if any. Currently, we don't have a way to get the unique
recipient list for individual posts due to graph api limitations.
Store the group mail address so that we can use it to populate the 'To'
field during Post -> EML exports.
---
#### Does this PR need a docs update or release note?
- [ ] ✅ Yes, it's included
- [ ] 🕐 Yes, but in a later PR
- [x] ⛔ No
#### Type of change
<!--- Please check the type of change your PR introduces: --->
- [x] 🌻 Feature
- [ ] 🐛 Bugfix
- [ ] 🗺️ Documentation
- [ ] 🤖 Supportability/Tests
- [ ] 💻 CI/Deployment
- [ ] 🧹 Tech Debt/Cleanup
#### Issue(s)
<!-- Can reference multiple issues. Use one of the following "magic words" - "closes, fixes" to auto-close the Github issue. -->
* #<issue>
#### Test Plan
<!-- How will this be tested prior to merging.-->
- [x] 💪 Manual
- [ ] ⚡ Unit test
- [ ] 💚 E2E
