Basic validation checks that make sure maintenance and retention options are consistent with each other. This at least makes sure retention is either enabled and maintenance extends locks or nothing is locked at all.
Going to be part of a set of PRs for validating the kopia config
---
#### Does this PR need a docs update or release note?
- [ ] ✅ Yes, it's included
- [ ] 🕐 Yes, but in a later PR
- [x] ⛔ No
#### Type of change
- [x] 🌻 Feature
- [ ] 🐛 Bugfix
- [ ] 🗺️ Documentation
- [x] 🤖 Supportability/Tests
- [ ] 💻 CI/Deployment
- [ ] 🧹 Tech Debt/Cleanup
#### Test Plan
- [ ] 💪 Manual
- [x] ⚡ Unit test
- [ ] 💚 E2E
Internally kopia has the notion of a retention policy. This adds a pin to each snapshot that corso uses kopia to create so that those snapshots won't be subject to kopia's rentention policy. As we disable kopia's retention policy during repo init this just acts as another layer of security to ensure snapshots won't be deleted unexpectedly.
Note that this PR only applies to _new_ snapshots that corso creates.
It doesn't go back and pin older snapshots for already existing backups
---
#### Does this PR need a docs update or release note?
- [ ] ✅ Yes, it's included
- [ ] 🕐 Yes, but in a later PR
- [x] ⛔ No
#### Type of change
- [ ] 🌻 Feature
- [x] 🐛 Bugfix
- [ ] 🗺️ Documentation
- [ ] 🤖 Supportability/Tests
- [ ] 💻 CI/Deployment
- [ ] 🧹 Tech Debt/Cleanup
#### Test Plan
- [ ] 💪 Manual
- [x] ⚡ Unit test
- [ ] 💚 E2E
We've found that reducing the MinEpochDuration parameter in kopia
can reduce GET requests sent to the object store by a large amount
(>50% in some cases) for repos that run many backups each day
This PR updates the init repo code path to set this parameter to
8hrs instead of the default 24hrs to bring in some of those savings
---
#### Does this PR need a docs update or release note?
- [ ] ✅ Yes, it's included
- [ ] 🕐 Yes, but in a later PR
- [x] ⛔ No
#### Type of change
- [x] 🌻 Feature
- [ ] 🐛 Bugfix
- [ ] 🗺️ Documentation
- [ ] 🤖 Supportability/Tests
- [ ] 💻 CI/Deployment
- [ ] 🧹 Tech Debt/Cleanup
#### Test Plan
- [ ] 💪 Manual
- [x] ⚡ Unit test
- [ ] 💚 E2E
<!-- PR description-->
---
#### Does this PR need a docs update or release note?
- [x] ✅ Yes, it's included
- [ ] 🕐 Yes, but in a later PR
- [ ] ⛔ No
#### Type of change
<!--- Please check the type of change your PR introduces: --->
- [ ] 🌻 Feature
- [x] 🐛 Bugfix
- [ ] 🗺️ Documentation
- [ ] 🤖 Supportability/Tests
- [ ] 💻 CI/Deployment
- [ ] 🧹 Tech Debt/Cleanup
#### Issue(s)
<!-- Can reference multiple issues. Use one of the following "magic words" - "closes, fixes" to auto-close the Github issue. -->
* fixes https://github.com/alcionai/corso/issues/5046
#### Test Plan
<!-- How will this be tested prior to merging.-->
- [ ] 💪 Manual
- [x] ⚡ Unit test
- [ ] 💚 E2E
<!-- PR description-->
Known issue, tracking in https://github.com/alcionai/corso/issues/4772
---
#### Does this PR need a docs update or release note?
- [ ] ✅ Yes, it's included
- [ ] 🕐 Yes, but in a later PR
- [x] ⛔ No
#### Type of change
<!--- Please check the type of change your PR introduces: --->
- [ ] 🌻 Feature
- [x] 🐛 Bugfix
- [ ] 🗺️ Documentation
- [ ] 🤖 Supportability/Tests
- [ ] 💻 CI/Deployment
- [ ] 🧹 Tech Debt/Cleanup
#### Issue(s)
<!-- Can reference multiple issues. Use one of the following "magic words" - "closes, fixes" to auto-close the Github issue. -->
* #<issue>
#### Test Plan
<!-- How will this be tested prior to merging.-->
- [ ] 💪 Manual
- [ ] ⚡ Unit test
- [ ] 💚 E2E
Minor optimization where we skip trying to find BackupBases if we know
we're going to end up dropping them anyway. This can save us from
loading all the kopia manifests only to discard the information we
pulled from them. Note that this optimization only kicks in for
backups that request no merge bases and no assist bases
("full backup")
Existing test coverage in `operations/manifests_test.go` ensures this
doesn't break base selection altogether
As this is an optimization we don't need to merge this PR if it seems
like it will make code maintenance more difficult going forward
---
#### Does this PR need a docs update or release note?
- [ ] ✅ Yes, it's included
- [ ] 🕐 Yes, but in a later PR
- [x] ⛔ No
#### Type of change
- [ ] 🌻 Feature
- [ ] 🐛 Bugfix
- [ ] 🗺️ Documentation
- [ ] 🤖 Supportability/Tests
- [ ] 💻 CI/Deployment
- [x] 🧹 Tech Debt/Cleanup
* #<issue>
#### Test Plan
- [ ] 💪 Manual
- [x] ⚡ Unit test
- [x] 💚 E2E
<!-- PR description-->
* Expand inReplyTo property to additionally get the parent post contents. This will be persisted as part of post data.
* This additional data will be useful for building a reply tree if we decide to do in-order restore/export in future.
---
#### Does this PR need a docs update or release note?
- [ ] ✅ Yes, it's included
- [ ] 🕐 Yes, but in a later PR
- [x] ⛔ No
#### Type of change
<!--- Please check the type of change your PR introduces: --->
- [x] 🌻 Feature
- [ ] 🐛 Bugfix
- [ ] 🗺️ Documentation
- [ ] 🤖 Supportability/Tests
- [ ] 💻 CI/Deployment
- [ ] 🧹 Tech Debt/Cleanup
#### Issue(s)
<!-- Can reference multiple issues. Use one of the following "magic words" - "closes, fixes" to auto-close the Github issue. -->
* #<issue>
#### Test Plan
<!-- How will this be tested prior to merging.-->
- [ ] 💪 Manual
- [x] ⚡ Unit test
- [ ] 💚 E2E
Use unique info for the kopia snapshot source information to help
isolate snapshots for different resources from each other. This will
come in handy both for checkpoint snapshots and regular snapshots if
kopia's retention policy happens to look for things.
Integration tests for this probably won't pass until the next PR in
the series is merged into this PR
---
#### Does this PR need a docs update or release note?
- [ ] ✅ Yes, it's included
- [ ] 🕐 Yes, but in a later PR
- [x] ⛔ No
#### Type of change
- [ ] 🌻 Feature
- [x] 🐛 Bugfix
- [ ] 🗺️ Documentation
- [ ] 🤖 Supportability/Tests
- [ ] 💻 CI/Deployment
- [ ] 🧹 Tech Debt/Cleanup
#### Issue(s)
merge after:
* #5091
* #5092
#### Test Plan
- [ ] 💪 Manual
- [x] ⚡ Unit test
- [ ] 💚 E2E
reverses the drive backup process toggle by making the tree-based backup standard, and the old, linear enumeration the toggleable fallback.
---
#### Does this PR need a docs update or release note?
- [x] ⛔ No
#### Type of change
- [x] 🌻 Feature
#### Issue(s)
* #4690
#### Test Plan
- [x] ⚡ Unit test
- [x] 💚 E2E
generates test lists for CI sanity tests
#### Does this PR need a docs update or release note?
- [ ] ✅ Yes, it's included
- [ ] 🕐 Yes, but in a later PR
- [x] ⛔ No
#### Type of change
<!--- Please check the type of change your PR introduces: --->
- [ ] 🌻 Feature
- [ ] 🐛 Bugfix
- [ ] 🗺️ Documentation
- [x] 🤖 Supportability/Tests
- [ ] 💻 CI/Deployment
- [ ] 🧹 Tech Debt/Cleanup
#### Issue(s)
#4754
#### Test Plan
<!-- How will this be tested prior to merging.-->
- [x] 💪 Manual
- [x] ⚡ Unit test
- [x] 💚 E2E
- includes GetList in list restore handler
- includes GetListsByCollisionKey in list restore handler
- updates mock list restore handler
#### Does this PR need a docs update or release note?
- [x] ⛔ No
#### Type of change
<!--- Please check the type of change your PR introduces: --->
- [x] 🌻 Feature
#### Issue(s)
#4754
#### Test Plan
<!-- How will this be tested prior to merging.-->
- [x] 💪 Manual
- [x] ⚡ Unit test
- [x] 💚 E2E
<!-- PR description-->
Posts are always sent to the group email address, along with additional
recipients if any. Currently, we don't have a way to get the unique
recipient list for individual posts due to graph api limitations.
Store the group mail address so that we can use it to populate the 'To'
field during Post -> EML exports.
---
#### Does this PR need a docs update or release note?
- [ ] ✅ Yes, it's included
- [ ] 🕐 Yes, but in a later PR
- [x] ⛔ No
#### Type of change
<!--- Please check the type of change your PR introduces: --->
- [x] 🌻 Feature
- [ ] 🐛 Bugfix
- [ ] 🗺️ Documentation
- [ ] 🤖 Supportability/Tests
- [ ] 💻 CI/Deployment
- [ ] 🧹 Tech Debt/Cleanup
#### Issue(s)
<!-- Can reference multiple issues. Use one of the following "magic words" - "closes, fixes" to auto-close the Github issue. -->
* #<issue>
#### Test Plan
<!-- How will this be tested prior to merging.-->
- [x] 💪 Manual
- [ ] ⚡ Unit test
- [ ] 💚 E2E
<!-- PR description-->
Graph sometimes just send timezone value which are available in TZ
database. This PR makes sure that we don't always try to convert, but
check if the timezone is already in the format that we need first.
---
#### Does this PR need a docs update or release note?
- [ ] ✅ Yes, it's included
- [ ] 🕐 Yes, but in a later PR
- [x] ⛔ No
#### Type of change
<!--- Please check the type of change your PR introduces: --->
- [ ] 🌻 Feature
- [x] 🐛 Bugfix
- [ ] 🗺️ Documentation
- [ ] 🤖 Supportability/Tests
- [ ] 💻 CI/Deployment
- [ ] 🧹 Tech Debt/Cleanup
#### Issue(s)
<!-- Can reference multiple issues. Use one of the following "magic
words" - "closes, fixes" to auto-close the Github issue. -->
* #<issue>
#### Test Plan
<!-- How will this be tested prior to merging.-->
- [ ] 💪 Manual
- [x] ⚡ Unit test
- [ ] 💚 E2E
---------
Co-authored-by: zackrossman <zrossman@alcion.ai>
<!-- PR description-->
---
#### Does this PR need a docs update or release note?
- [ ] ✅ Yes, it's included
- [ ] 🕐 Yes, but in a later PR
- [x] ⛔ No
#### Type of change
<!--- Please check the type of change your PR introduces: --->
- [x] 🌻 Feature
- [ ] 🐛 Bugfix
- [ ] 🗺️ Documentation
- [ ] 🤖 Supportability/Tests
- [ ] 💻 CI/Deployment
- [ ] 🧹 Tech Debt/Cleanup
#### Issue(s)
<!-- Can reference multiple issues. Use one of the following "magic words" - "closes, fixes" to auto-close the Github issue. -->
* https://github.com/alcionai/corso/issues/5039
#### Test Plan
<!-- How will this be tested prior to merging.-->
- [ ] 💪 Manual
- [x] ⚡ Unit test
- [ ] 💚 E2E
<!-- PR description-->
---
#### Does this PR need a docs update or release note?
- [ ] ✅ Yes, it's included
- [ ] 🕐 Yes, but in a later PR
- [x] ⛔ No
#### Type of change
<!--- Please check the type of change your PR introduces: --->
- [ ] 🌻 Feature
- [ ] 🐛 Bugfix
- [ ] 🗺️ Documentation
- [x] 🤖 Supportability/Tests
- [ ] 💻 CI/Deployment
- [ ] 🧹 Tech Debt/Cleanup
#### Issue(s)
<!-- Can reference multiple issues. Use one of the following "magic words" - "closes, fixes" to auto-close the Github issue. -->
* #<issue>
#### Test Plan
<!-- How will this be tested prior to merging.-->
- [ ] 💪 Manual
- [ ] ⚡ Unit test
- [ ] 💚 E2E
Fix bug where we tried to create folders with an empty display name
when the user did a restore with `/` or `""` as the restore destination
for contacts
This PR is safe with the current flow for backing up contact folders
because nested folders aren't backed up at all (at least nesting beyond
the first level). It is unclear, though possible, that this patch will
continue to work if we backup nested contact folders
Also adds basic smoke tests for this issue for all exchange data types
---
#### Does this PR need a docs update or release note?
- [x] ✅ Yes, it's included
- [ ] 🕐 Yes, but in a later PR
- [ ] ⛔ No
#### Type of change
- [ ] 🌻 Feature
- [x] 🐛 Bugfix
- [ ] 🗺️ Documentation
- [ ] 🤖 Supportability/Tests
- [ ] 💻 CI/Deployment
- [ ] 🧹 Tech Debt/Cleanup
#### Test Plan
- [x] 💪 Manual
- [x] ⚡ Unit test
- [ ] 💚 E2E
This value was present in the control.Options in the struct and
passed as a parameter. This PR removes the parameter so it's clear
the control.Options one is used
---
#### Does this PR need a docs update or release note?
- [ ] ✅ Yes, it's included
- [ ] 🕐 Yes, but in a later PR
- [x] ⛔ No
#### Type of change
- [ ] 🌻 Feature
- [ ] 🐛 Bugfix
- [ ] 🗺️ Documentation
- [ ] 🤖 Supportability/Tests
- [ ] 💻 CI/Deployment
- [x] 🧹 Tech Debt/Cleanup
#### Issue(s)
* #5012
#### Test Plan
- [ ] 💪 Manual
- [x] ⚡ Unit test
- [x] 💚 E2E
path.Build produces the same result with more standard and centralized behavior.
---
#### Does this PR need a docs update or release note?
- [x] ⛔ No
#### Type of change
- [x] 🧹 Tech Debt/Cleanup
#### Issue(s)
* #4025
#### Test Plan
- [x] ⚡ Unit test
- [x] 💚 E2E
just touchups for supportability and tracking, plus a ux tweak here and there. No real logic changes.
---
#### Does this PR need a docs update or release note?
- [x] ⛔ No
#### Type of change
- [x] 🤖 Supportability/Tests
#### Test Plan
- [x] ⚡ Unit test
- [x] 💚 E2E
<!-- PR description-->
---
#### Does this PR need a docs update or release note?
- [x] ✅ Yes, it's included
- [ ] 🕐 Yes, but in a later PR
- [ ] ⛔ No
#### Type of change
<!--- Please check the type of change your PR introduces: --->
- [x] 🌻 Feature
- [ ] 🐛 Bugfix
- [ ] 🗺️ Documentation
- [ ] 🤖 Supportability/Tests
- [ ] 💻 CI/Deployment
- [ ] 🧹 Tech Debt/Cleanup
#### Issue(s)
<!-- Can reference multiple issues. Use one of the following "magic words" - "closes, fixes" to auto-close the Github issue. -->
* closes https://github.com/alcionai/corso/issues/3890
#### Test Plan
<!-- How will this be tested prior to merging.-->
- [ ] 💪 Manual
- [x] ⚡ Unit test
- [ ] 💚 E2E
The idea is to mimic the format in which graph convert html into text when generating ics which gets embedded into eml file.
---
#### Does this PR need a docs update or release note?
- [ ] ✅ Yes, it's included
- [x] 🕐 Yes, but in a later PR
- [ ] ⛔ No
#### Type of change
<!--- Please check the type of change your PR introduces: --->
- [x] 🌻 Feature
- [ ] 🐛 Bugfix
- [ ] 🗺️ Documentation
- [ ] 🤖 Supportability/Tests
- [ ] 💻 CI/Deployment
- [ ] 🧹 Tech Debt/Cleanup
#### Issue(s)
<!-- Can reference multiple issues. Use one of the following "magic words" - "closes, fixes" to auto-close the Github issue. -->
* #<issue>
#### Test Plan
<!-- How will this be tested prior to merging.-->
- [ ] 💪 Manual
- [x] ⚡ Unit test
- [ ] 💚 E2E
<!-- PR description-->
---
#### Does this PR need a docs update or release note?
- [ ] ✅ Yes, it's included
- [ ] 🕐 Yes, but in a later PR
- [x] ⛔ No
#### Type of change
<!--- Please check the type of change your PR introduces: --->
- [x] 🌻 Feature
- [ ] 🐛 Bugfix
- [ ] 🗺️ Documentation
- [ ] 🤖 Supportability/Tests
- [ ] 💻 CI/Deployment
- [ ] 🧹 Tech Debt/Cleanup
#### Issue(s)
<!-- Can reference multiple issues. Use one of the following "magic words" - "closes, fixes" to auto-close the Github issue. -->
* https://github.com/alcionai/corso/issues/3890
#### Test Plan
<!-- How will this be tested prior to merging.-->
- [ ] 💪 Manual
- [x] ⚡ Unit test
- [ ] 💚 E2E
Previously we were not accurately handling the end date of recurring
events. This was because we treated end date to be start of the day
instead of the end of day.
<!-- PR description-->
---
#### Does this PR need a docs update or release note?
- [ ] ✅ Yes, it's included
- [ ] 🕐 Yes, but in a later PR
- [x] ⛔ No
#### Type of change
<!--- Please check the type of change your PR introduces: --->
- [x] 🌻 Feature
- [ ] 🐛 Bugfix
- [ ] 🗺️ Documentation
- [ ] 🤖 Supportability/Tests
- [ ] 💻 CI/Deployment
- [ ] 🧹 Tech Debt/Cleanup
#### Issue(s)
<!-- Can reference multiple issues. Use one of the following "magic words" - "closes, fixes" to auto-close the Github issue. -->
* https://github.com/alcionai/corso/issues/3890
#### Test Plan
<!-- How will this be tested prior to merging.-->
- [ ] 💪 Manual
- [x] ⚡ Unit test
- [ ] 💚 E2E
<!-- PR description-->
---
#### Does this PR need a docs update or release note?
- [ ] ✅ Yes, it's included
- [ ] 🕐 Yes, but in a later PR
- [x] ⛔ No
#### Type of change
<!--- Please check the type of change your PR introduces: --->
- [x] 🌻 Feature
- [ ] 🐛 Bugfix
- [ ] 🗺️ Documentation
- [ ] 🤖 Supportability/Tests
- [ ] 💻 CI/Deployment
- [ ] 🧹 Tech Debt/Cleanup
#### Issue(s)
<!-- Can reference multiple issues. Use one of the following "magic words" - "closes, fixes" to auto-close the Github issue. -->
* https://github.com/alcionai/corso/issues/3890
#### Test Plan
<!-- How will this be tested prior to merging.-->
- [ ] 💪 Manual
- [x] ⚡ Unit test
- [ ] 💚 E2E
make a canonical 'not found' error for our core sentinels. This replaces the graph.DeletedInFlight error, which acted as an interpretation of "not found".
---
#### Does this PR need a docs update or release note?
- [x] ⛔ No
#### Type of change
- [x] 🧹 Tech Debt/Cleanup
#### Issue(s)
* #4685
#### Test Plan
- [x] ⚡ Unit test
- [x] 💚 E2E
some housecleaning before reviewing deadlock issues
---
#### Does this PR need a docs update or release note?
- [x] ⛔ No
#### Type of change
- [x] 🧹 Tech Debt/Cleanup
#### Test Plan
- [x] ⚡ Unit test
refactors post list to accept deseriallized stored list
#### Does this PR need a docs update or release note?
- [x] ⛔ No
#### Type of change
<!--- Please check the type of change your PR introduces: --->
- [x] 🧹 Tech Debt/Cleanup
#### Issue(s)
#4754
#### Test Plan
<!-- How will this be tested prior to merging.-->
- [x] 💪 Manual
- [x] ⚡ Unit test
- [x] 💚 E2E
now that we have a core error library, we can start swapping out the percolation of graph api errors with core error sentinels. This PR begins that process by adding a centralized transformer to the graph service handlers that ensures all calls produce the same set of core errors according to some standard categorizations. This is just an initial step, and does not transfer all graph errors into core sentinels.
---
#### Does this PR need a docs update or release note?
- [x] ⛔ No
#### Type of change
- [x] 🤖 Supportability/Tests
#### Issue(s)
* #4685
#### Test Plan
- [x] ⚡ Unit test
- [x] 💚 E2E
Called functions add clues so there's no need to add them ourselves.
---
#### Does this PR need a docs update or release note?
- [ ] ✅ Yes, it's included
- [ ] 🕐 Yes, but in a later PR
- [x] ⛔ No
#### Type of change
- [ ] 🌻 Feature
- [ ] 🐛 Bugfix
- [ ] 🗺️ Documentation
- [ ] 🤖 Supportability/Tests
- [ ] 💻 CI/Deployment
- [x] 🧹 Tech Debt/Cleanup
#### Test Plan
- [ ] 💪 Manual
- [x] ⚡ Unit test
- [ ] 💚 E2E
<!-- PR description-->
---
#### Does this PR need a docs update or release note?
- [x] ⛔ No
#### Type of change
- [x] 🐛 Bugfix
- [x] 🧹 Tech Debt/Cleanup
#### Test Plan
- [x] 💚 E2E
Add extra logging and clues to errors when populating container caches for Exchange. This could help track down some things related to time spent getting data.
---
#### Does this PR need a docs update or release note?
- [ ] ✅ Yes, it's included
- [ ] 🕐 Yes, but in a later PR
- [x] ⛔ No
#### Type of change
- [ ] 🌻 Feature
- [ ] 🐛 Bugfix
- [ ] 🗺️ Documentation
- [x] 🤖 Supportability/Tests
- [ ] 💻 CI/Deployment
- [ ] 🧹 Tech Debt/Cleanup
#### Test Plan
- [x] 💪 Manual
- [ ] ⚡ Unit test
- [ ] 💚 E2E
<!-- PR description-->
---
#### Does this PR need a docs update or release note?
- [ ] ✅ Yes, it's included
- [ ] 🕐 Yes, but in a later PR
- [x] ⛔ No
#### Type of change
<!--- Please check the type of change your PR introduces: --->
- [ ] 🌻 Feature
- [x] 🐛 Bugfix
- [ ] 🗺️ Documentation
- [ ] 🤖 Supportability/Tests
- [ ] 💻 CI/Deployment
- [ ] 🧹 Tech Debt/Cleanup
#### Issue(s)
<!-- Can reference multiple issues. Use one of the following "magic words" - "closes, fixes" to auto-close the Github issue. -->
* #<issue>
#### Test Plan
<!-- How will this be tested prior to merging.-->
- [ ] 💪 Manual
- [x] ⚡ Unit test
- [ ] 💚 E2E
- All permissions failures are now recoverable to the granularity of a single permission or link share
- Failure to delete child permissions because the permission was not restored on parent will now not produce any warnings
---
#### Does this PR need a docs update or release note?
- [ ] ✅ Yes, it's included
- [ ] 🕐 Yes, but in a later PR
- [x] ⛔ No
#### Type of change
<!--- Please check the type of change your PR introduces: --->
- [ ] 🌻 Feature
- [x] 🐛 Bugfix
- [ ] 🗺️ Documentation
- [ ] 🤖 Supportability/Tests
- [ ] 💻 CI/Deployment
- [ ] 🧹 Tech Debt/Cleanup
#### Issue(s)
<!-- Can reference multiple issues. Use one of the following "magic words" - "closes, fixes" to auto-close the Github issue. -->
* #<issue>
#### Test Plan
<!-- How will this be tested prior to merging.-->
- [ ] 💪 Manual
- [x] ⚡ Unit test
- [ ] 💚 E2E
provision to export sharepoint lists
#### Does this PR need a docs update or release note?
- [x] ⛔ No
#### Type of change
<!--- Please check the type of change your PR introduces: --->
- [x] 🌻 Feature
#### Issue(s)
#4752
#### Test Plan
<!-- How will this be tested prior to merging.-->
- [x] 💪 Manual
- [x] ⚡ Unit test
- [x] 💚 E2E
saves previous path for lists in storage.
#### Does this PR need a docs update or release note?
- [x] ⛔ No
#### Type of change
<!--- Please check the type of change your PR introduces: --->
- [x] 🌻 Feature
#### Issue(s)
#4754
#### Test Plan
<!-- How will this be tested prior to merging.-->
- [x] 💪 Manual
- [x] ⚡ Unit test
- [x] 💚 E2E
first step towards having a centralized set of error sentinels that can be passed around corso instead of re-using low level error sentinels like those found in the graph/errors.go file.
This PR works as a standalone, and only handles the lowest hanging fruit. SDK consumers will need to change their error enum references, but all api behavior should remain the same.
---
#### Does this PR need a docs update or release note?
- [x] ⛔ No
#### Type of change
- [x] 🤖 Supportability/Tests
#### Issue(s)
* #4685
#### Test Plan
- [x] ⚡ Unit test
- [x] 💚 E2E
<!-- PR description-->
Fixed all cases where we missed propagating errors. Also added a lint rule in CI to catch it.
---
#### Does this PR need a docs update or release note?
- [ ] ✅ Yes, it's included
- [ ] 🕐 Yes, but in a later PR
- [x] ⛔ No
#### Type of change
<!--- Please check the type of change your PR introduces: --->
- [ ] 🌻 Feature
- [ ] 🐛 Bugfix
- [ ] 🗺️ Documentation
- [ ] 🤖 Supportability/Tests
- [ ] 💻 CI/Deployment
- [x] 🧹 Tech Debt/Cleanup
#### Issue(s)
<!-- Can reference multiple issues. Use one of the following "magic words" - "closes, fixes" to auto-close the Github issue. -->
* #<issue>
#### Test Plan
<!-- How will this be tested prior to merging.-->
- [x] 💪 Manual
- [ ] ⚡ Unit test
- [ ] 💚 E2E
There are a few more pending items. I've added TODO entries for them. The PR was getting pretty big and so I thought I would address them in a followup PR.
---
#### Does this PR need a docs update or release note?
- [ ] ✅ Yes, it's included
- [ ] 🕐 Yes, but in a later PR
- [ ] ⛔ No
#### Type of change
<!--- Please check the type of change your PR introduces: --->
- [ ] 🌻 Feature
- [ ] 🐛 Bugfix
- [ ] 🗺️ Documentation
- [ ] 🤖 Supportability/Tests
- [ ] 💻 CI/Deployment
- [ ] 🧹 Tech Debt/Cleanup
#### Issue(s)
<!-- Can reference multiple issues. Use one of the following "magic words" - "closes, fixes" to auto-close the Github issue. -->
* https://github.com/alcionai/corso/issues/3890
#### Test Plan
<!-- How will this be tested prior to merging.-->
- [ ] 💪 Manual
- [ ] ⚡ Unit test
- [ ] 💚 E2E
fix tests referencing top level of SharepointInfo for list details instead of nested ListInfo.
also disables a test that requires list backup to be enabled in CLI level.
#### Does this PR need a docs update or release note?
- [x] ⛔ No
#### Type of change
<!--- Please check the type of change your PR introduces: --->
- [x] 🐛 Bugfix
#### Issue(s)
https://github.com/alcionai/corso/actions/runs/7312375792/job/19922878417#step:6:666
#### Test Plan
<!-- How will this be tested prior to merging.-->
- [x] 💪 Manual
- [x] ⚡ Unit test
- [x] 💚 E2E
ignores accessRequest list templates from backup and restore
#### Does this PR need a docs update or release note?
- [x] ⛔ No
#### Type of change
<!--- Please check the type of change your PR introduces: --->
- [x] 🌻 Feature
#### Issue(s)
#4754
#### Test Plan
<!-- How will this be tested prior to merging.-->
- [x] 💪 Manual
- [x] ⚡ Unit test
- [x] 💚 E2E
<!-- PR description-->
---
#### Does this PR need a docs update or release note?
- [x] ✅ Yes, it's included
- [ ] 🕐 Yes, but in a later PR
- [ ] ⛔ No
#### Type of change
<!--- Please check the type of change your PR introduces: --->
- [x] 🌻 Feature
- [ ] 🐛 Bugfix
- [ ] 🗺️ Documentation
- [ ] 🤖 Supportability/Tests
- [ ] 💻 CI/Deployment
- [ ] 🧹 Tech Debt/Cleanup
#### Issue(s)
<!-- Can reference multiple issues. Use one of the following "magic words" - "closes, fixes" to auto-close the Github issue. -->
* closes https://github.com/alcionai/corso/issues/3891
#### Test Plan
<!-- How will this be tested prior to merging.-->
- [ ] 💪 Manual
- [x] ⚡ Unit test
- [ ] 💚 E2E
refactors sharepoint lists collection by:
- renaming `Collection` interface as `preFetchCollection` interface
- making `finishPopulation` method as independent function
- seralizing list using `serializeContent` function
#### Does this PR need a docs update or release note?
- [x] ⛔ No
#### Type of change
- [x] 🧹 Tech Debt/Cleanup
#### Issue(s)
#4754
#### Test Plan
<!-- How will this be tested prior to merging.-->
- [x] 💪 Manual
- [x] ⚡ Unit test
- [x] 💚 E2E
skips documentLibrary templated lists from:
- restoration
- details
but the lists with 'documentLibrary' are backed-up.
this is in addition to 'webTemplateExtensionsList' templated lists which were previously skipped from restore.
the `skipping` of lists with template 'documentLibrary' is temporary and to be enabled with correct handling.
**update:27/12/2023**
skips `documentLibrary`, `sharingLinks`, `webTemplateExtensionsList` templated lists from being backed-up altogether
site contents of `https://10rqc2.sharepoint.com/sites/CorsoCI`:
backup details
```
./corso backup details sharepoint --backup 5e0a13b0-bff0-471b-8860-2aec869717b2
Logging to file: /home/hitesh/.cache/corso/logs/2023-12-23T14-52-37Z.log
Connecting to M365 done
Connecting to repository 30s done
ID List Items Created Modified
c7ffe2f0a275 Test List 0 2023-05-12T12:28:51Z 2023-05-12T12:28:51Z
5345df87b565 Meh 0 2023-05-12T12:59:50Z 2023-05-12T12:59:50Z
cd2854591ab4 corso-restore-list_135b9067-0e19-4a5c-9475-ced51730c211 0 2023-12-11T10:25:27Z 2023-12-23T13:19:24Z
0f56b7f450fa corsorestorelist_newlist 0 2023-12-11T10:31:54Z 2023-12-11T10:31:54Z
3a7be2fb9d50 new list 0 2023-11-29T18:29:07Z 2023-11-29T18:29:07Z
edab0c775e5e New List Name 0 2023-05-12T12:39:06Z 2023-12-23T13:25:39Z
4d7ad9b1df98 MockListing 0 2023-05-12T12:15:14Z 2023-12-14T06:22:36Z
d2bdca596f75 integration-test-list 6 2023-11-30T06:57:01Z 2023-12-14T06:09:45Z
c9eccc9771a3 Sharing Links 74 2023-06-26T07:21:31Z 2023-12-14T06:06:31Z
5e79dcd93c92 New List Name 2 0 2023-05-12T12:40:15Z 2023-05-12T12:40:15Z
6a6acbaa0d10 corsorestorelist_7f99d792-cae0-4a87-9e68-fd930f5b123e 0 2023-12-11T10:28:25Z 2023-12-23T13:19:57Z
```
restore details
```
./corso restore sharepoint --backup 5e0a13b0-bff0-471b-8860-2aec869717b2
Logging to file: /home/hitesh/.cache/corso/logs/2023-12-23T14-53-37Z.log
Connecting to M365 done
Connecting to repository 26s done
Restoring to folder Corso_Restore_23-Dec-2023_14-54-05
Restoring ∙ https://10rqc2.sharepoint.com/sites/CorsoCI
Discovered 11 items in backup 5e0a13b0-bff0-471b-8860-2aec869717b2 to restore
Enumerating items in repository 1m2s done
Restoring data 50s done
Restore Complete
Restored 11 items
ID List Items Created Modified
edab0c775e5e Corso_Restore_23-Dec-2023_14-54-05_New List Name 0 2023-12-23T14:54:23Z 2023-12-23T14:54:23Z
cd2854591ab4 Corso_Restore_23-Dec-2023_14-54-05_corso-restore-list_135b9067-0e19-4a5c-9475-ced51730c211 0 2023-12-23T14:54:25Z 2023-12-23T14:54:25Z
5345df87b565 Corso_Restore_23-Dec-2023_14-54-05_Meh 0 2023-12-23T14:54:26Z 2023-12-23T14:54:26Z
4d7ad9b1df98 Corso_Restore_23-Dec-2023_14-54-05_MockListing 0 2023-12-23T14:54:28Z 2023-12-23T14:54:28Z
d2bdca596f75 Corso_Restore_23-Dec-2023_14-54-05_integration-test-list 6 2023-12-23T14:54:29Z 2023-12-23T14:54:31Z
c7ffe2f0a275 Corso_Restore_23-Dec-2023_14-54-05_Test List 0 2023-12-23T14:54:34Z 2023-12-23T14:54:34Z
c9eccc9771a3 Corso_Restore_23-Dec-2023_14-54-05_Sharing Links 74 2023-12-23T14:54:36Z 2023-12-23T14:54:36Z
5e79dcd93c92 Corso_Restore_23-Dec-2023_14-54-05_New List Name 2 0 2023-12-23T14:55:09Z 2023-12-23T14:55:09Z
6a6acbaa0d10 Corso_Restore_23-Dec-2023_14-54-05_corsorestorelist_7f99d792-cae0-4a87-9e68-fd930f5b123e 0 2023-12-23T14:55:10Z 2023-12-23T14:55:10Z
0f56b7f450fa Corso_Restore_23-Dec-2023_14-54-05_corsorestorelist_newlist 0 2023-12-23T14:55:11Z 2023-12-23T14:55:11Z
```
#### Does this PR need a docs update or release note?
- [x] ⛔ No
#### Type of change
<!--- Please check the type of change your PR introduces: --->
- [x] 🐛 Bugfix
#### Issue(s)
#4754
#### Test Plan
<!-- How will this be tested prior to merging.-->
- [x] 💪 Manual
- [x] ⚡ Unit test
- [x] 💚 E2E
<!-- PR description-->
* We had a few duplicated tests. Removing them.
* Adding conversations selector for group v9 bump tests. Although technically it's not needed, since we didn't have conversations support prior to v9.
---
#### Does this PR need a docs update or release note?
- [ ] ✅ Yes, it's included
- [ ] 🕐 Yes, but in a later PR
- [x] ⛔ No
#### Type of change
<!--- Please check the type of change your PR introduces: --->
- [ ] 🌻 Feature
- [ ] 🐛 Bugfix
- [ ] 🗺️ Documentation
- [ ] 🤖 Supportability/Tests
- [ ] 💻 CI/Deployment
- [x] 🧹 Tech Debt/Cleanup
#### Issue(s)
<!-- Can reference multiple issues. Use one of the following "magic words" - "closes, fixes" to auto-close the Github issue. -->
* #<issue>
#### Test Plan
<!-- How will this be tested prior to merging.-->
- [ ] 💪 Manual
- [ ] ⚡ Unit test
- [x] 💚 E2E
Skips backup of non-recoverable list templates.
#### Does this PR need a docs update or release note?
- [x] ⛔ No
#### Type of change
<!--- Please check the type of change your PR introduces: --->
- [x] 🧹 Tech Debt/Cleanup
#### Issue(s)
#4754
#### Test Plan
<!-- How will this be tested prior to merging.-->
- [x] 💪 Manual
- [x] ⚡ Unit test
- [x] 💚 E2E
<!-- PR description-->
---
#### Does this PR need a docs update or release note?
- [x] ✅ Yes, it's included
#### Type of change
<!--- Please check the type of change your PR introduces: --->
- [x] 🌻 Feature
#### Issue(s)
<!-- Can reference multiple issues. Use one of the following "magic words" - "closes, fixes" to auto-close the Github issue. -->
* Closes https://github.com/alcionai/corso/issues/4862
#### Test Plan
<!-- How will this be tested prior to merging.-->
- [x] 💪 Manual
- [x] 💚 E2E
<!-- PR description-->
Discovered an issue with how we were handling items deleted in flight with the lazy item reader. This needs to go in before integration PR. https://github.com/alcionai/corso/pull/4921
Here are the details.
**Orig:**
* For such items, we were using the exchange approach to persist an empty data file (with serialized version) and not persist it in details file.
* Exchange discovers the deleted items during next backup during delta query and excludes them.
**Problem:**
* Group mailbox doesn't support delta queries. Also, there is no graph API to discover/fetch deleted items.
* So if we use the exchange lazy reader approach like above, the ongoing backup will succeed. However, the next incremental backup fails during details merge with ` running backup: merging details: incomplete migration of backup details`.
* Failure is [here](c58cd9302f/src/internal/operations/backup.go (L837)). It's because the deleted item reporefs are still present in the merge base. Since there is no delta query, there is no `GetDeleted()` to exclude the item.
**Mod:**
* Using the approach drive lazy reader code uses to mark an item as skipped, so that kopia doesn't error out during upload.
---
#### Does this PR need a docs update or release note?
- [ ] ✅ Yes, it's included
- [ ] 🕐 Yes, but in a later PR
- [x] ⛔ No
#### Type of change
<!--- Please check the type of change your PR introduces: --->
- [ ] 🌻 Feature
- [x] 🐛 Bugfix
- [ ] 🗺️ Documentation
- [ ] 🤖 Supportability/Tests
- [ ] 💻 CI/Deployment
- [ ] 🧹 Tech Debt/Cleanup
#### Issue(s)
<!-- Can reference multiple issues. Use one of the following "magic words" - "closes, fixes" to auto-close the Github issue. -->
* https://github.com/alcionai/corso/issues/4862
#### Test Plan
<!-- How will this be tested prior to merging.-->
- [x] 💪 Manual
- [x] ⚡ Unit test
- [ ] 💚 E2E
Add code and tests for sanitizing emails
Also adds code for sanitizing events and contacts but we can remove
that if we'd like to address it if/when needed. We haven't yet seen
or tried to create instances of those
---
#### Does this PR need a docs update or release note?
- [x] ✅ Yes, it's included
- [ ] 🕐 Yes, but in a later PR
- [ ] ⛔ No
#### Type of change
- [ ] 🌻 Feature
- [x] 🐛 Bugfix
- [ ] 🗺️ Documentation
- [ ] 🤖 Supportability/Tests
- [ ] 💻 CI/Deployment
- [ ] 🧹 Tech Debt/Cleanup
#### Test Plan
- [ ] 💪 Manual
- [x] ⚡ Unit test
- [ ] 💚 E2E
Functions help check things like
* are two items equal when taking into account nil, empty slices, and
other zero-values?
* is something fully populated?
---
#### Does this PR need a docs update or release note?
- [ ] ✅ Yes, it's included
- [ ] 🕐 Yes, but in a later PR
- [x] ⛔ No
#### Type of change
- [ ] 🌻 Feature
- [ ] 🐛 Bugfix
- [ ] 🗺️ Documentation
- [x] 🤖 Supportability/Tests
- [ ] 💻 CI/Deployment
- [ ] 🧹 Tech Debt/Cleanup
#### Test Plan
- [x] 💪 Manual
- [ ] ⚡ Unit test
- [ ] 💚 E2E
replaces list deletion, on creation of list items failure, with fault bus. Thereby restores list with list items that could be restored.
#### Does this PR need a docs update or release note?
- [x] ⛔ No
#### Type of change
<!--- Please check the type of change your PR introduces: --->
- [x] 🧹 Tech Debt/Cleanup
#### Issue(s)
#4754
#### Test Plan
<!-- How will this be tested prior to merging.-->
- [x] 💪 Manual
- [x] ⚡ Unit test
- [x] 💚 E2E
