Fixes https://github.com/alcionai/corso/issues/3113
---
#### Does this PR need a docs update or release note?
- [ ] ✅ Yes, it's included
- [ ] 🕐 Yes, but in a later PR
- [x] ⛔ No
#### Type of change
<!--- Please check the type of change your PR introduces: --->
- [ ] 🌻 Feature
- [x] 🐛 Bugfix
- [ ] 🗺️ Documentation
- [ ] 🤖 Supportability/Tests
- [ ] 💻 CI/Deployment
- [ ] 🧹 Tech Debt/Cleanup
#### Issue(s)
<!-- Can reference multiple issues. Use one of the following "magic words" - "closes, fixes" to auto-close the Github issue. -->
* https://github.com/alcionai/corso/issues/3113
#### Test Plan
<!-- How will this be tested prior to merging.-->
- [x] 💪 Manual
- [ ] ⚡ Unit test
- [ ] 💚 E2E
Augment the folder backup details entries with
LocationRef and some information about what
data type generated the entry. Also add top-level
container information like drive name/ID if
applicable
Refactor code to do folder generation to make it
more contained and require less parameters to add
entries to backup details
Important changes are in details.go. All other
changes are just to keep up with the slightly
modified function API or update tests
---
#### Does this PR need a docs update or release note?
- [ ] ✅ Yes, it's included
- [ ] 🕐 Yes, but in a later PR
- [x] ⛔ No
#### Type of change
- [x] 🌻 Feature
- [ ] 🐛 Bugfix
- [ ] 🗺️ Documentation
- [ ] 🤖 Supportability/Tests
- [ ] 💻 CI/Deployment
- [ ] 🧹 Tech Debt/Cleanup
#### Issue(s)
* closes#3120
* closes#2138
#### Test Plan
- [x] 💪 Manual
- [x] ⚡ Unit test
- [ ] 💚 E2E
retry when we receive a "connection reset by peer" error
---
#### Does this PR need a docs update or release note?
- [x] ✅ Yes, it's included
#### Type of change
- [x] 🐛 Bugfix
#### Issue(s)
* #3129
#### Test Plan
- [x] 💪 Manual
- [x] ⚡ Unit test
<!-- PR description-->
This PR moves the `api` module from `src/internal/connector/discovery`
to `src/pkg/services/m365/api` so that the Client can be reused.
#### Does this PR need a docs update or release note?
- [ ] ✅ Yes, it's included
- [ ] 🕐 Yes, but in a later PR
- [x] ⛔ No
#### Type of change
<!--- Please check the type of change your PR introduces: --->
- [x] 🌻 Feature
- [ ] 🐛 Bugfix
- [ ] 🗺️ Documentation
- [ ] 🤖 Supportability/Tests
- [ ] 💻 CI/Deployment
- [ ] 🧹 Tech Debt/Cleanup
#### Issue(s)
<!-- Can reference multiple issues. Use one of the following "magic
words" - "closes, fixes" to auto-close the Github issue. -->
* #ALC-2214
#### Test Plan
<!-- How will this be tested prior to merging.-->
- [ ] 💪 Manual
- [x] ⚡ Unit test
- [ ] 💚 E2E
---------
Co-authored-by: aviator-app[bot] <48659329+aviator-app[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Previously we were using permission ids to check if two permissions
are equal. While we were aware the permission ids can repeat across
different folder hierarchies we were not aware that this was also the
case within a single folder tree if we delete and break the
inheritance chain.
Assume the following scenario:
1. Create folder `a` and `a/b`
2. Assign user1:read permission to `a`
3. Remove the inherited permission from `a/b`
4. Assign user1:write permission to `a/b`
In this case both the user1:read and user1:write will get the same permissions id.<!-- PR description-->
---
#### Does this PR need a docs update or release note?
- [ ] ✅ Yes, it's included
- [ ] 🕐 Yes, but in a later PR
- [x] ⛔ No
#### Type of change
<!--- Please check the type of change your PR introduces: --->
- [ ] 🌻 Feature
- [x] 🐛 Bugfix
- [ ] 🗺️ Documentation
- [ ] 🤖 Supportability/Tests
- [ ] 💻 CI/Deployment
- [ ] 🧹 Tech Debt/Cleanup
#### Issue(s)
<!-- Can reference multiple issues. Use one of the following "magic words" - "closes, fixes" to auto-close the Github issue. -->
* fixes https://github.com/alcionai/corso/issues/3116
#### Test Plan
<!-- How will this be tested prior to merging.-->
- [ ] 💪 Manual
- [x] ⚡ Unit test
- [ ] 💚 E2E
This allows using immutable IDs for Exchange objects. It does not add this header to put requests as we don't record the IDs of restored objects anywhere.
May slightly increase performance of events backups as
it now sets the delta query page size to 200 like with
other requests
---
#### Does this PR need a docs update or release note?
- [ ] ✅ Yes, it's included
- [ ] 🕐 Yes, but in a later PR
- [x] ⛔ No
#### Type of change
- [x] 🌻 Feature
- [ ] 🐛 Bugfix
- [ ] 🗺️ Documentation
- [ ] 🤖 Supportability/Tests
- [ ] 💻 CI/Deployment
- [ ] 🧹 Tech Debt/Cleanup
#### Issue(s)
* #2861
#### Test Plan
- [x] 💪 Manual
- [ ] ⚡ Unit test
- [ ] 💚 E2E
Allow restoring OneDrive and SharePoint items by
M365 ID as well as file name and ShortRef
Does create an edgecase where attempting to
restore an item named the same as another item's
M365 ID causes both items to be restored
Moves the consts for OneDrive file suffixes to a
different package so that the selectors package
can also import them without a cycle
---
#### Does this PR need a docs update or release note?
- [x] ✅ Yes, it's included
- [ ] 🕐 Yes, but in a later PR
- [ ] ⛔ No
#### Type of change
- [x] 🌻 Feature
- [ ] 🐛 Bugfix
- [ ] 🗺️ Documentation
- [ ] 🤖 Supportability/Tests
- [ ] 💻 CI/Deployment
- [ ] 🧹 Tech Debt/Cleanup
#### Issue(s)
* closes#3142
#### Test Plan
- [x] 💪 Manual
- [ ] ⚡ Unit test
- [ ] 💚 E2E
It's an unnecessary paramter. Plus, this sets up the next pr to have a smaller footprint.
---
#### Does this PR need a docs update or release note?
- [x] ⛔ No
#### Type of change
- [x] 🧹 Tech Debt/Cleanup
#### Issue(s)
* #3129
#### Test Plan
- [x] ⚡ Unit test
- [x] 💚 E2E
It makes more sense for mock data types to be
owned by the service package, not by the connector package as a whole.
---
#### Does this PR need a docs update or release note?
- [x] ⛔ No
#### Type of change
- [x] 🧹 Tech Debt/Cleanup
#### Test Plan
- [x] ⚡ Unit test
- [x] 💚 E2E
Cleans out some unused exchange options builders.
Also tops the mailFolders userinfo check to a single folder, since we only need one result to verify access.
---
#### Does this PR need a docs update or release note?
- [x] ⛔ No
#### Type of change
- [x] 🧹 Tech Debt/Cleanup
#### Test Plan
- [x] ⚡ Unit test
- [x] 💚 E2E
Leverage structs from previous PRs to
populate and persist the LocationRef
for OneDrive
Right now the source of the
LocationRef is still based off the
RepoRef path, but this is in the
OneDrive code only
Manually tested
* updating a subfolder path when parent folder was moved
* populating LocationRef when the base backup didn't have LocationRefs when nothing was changed in OneDrive
* populating LocationRef when the base backup didn't have LocationRefs when something was changed in OneDrive
---
#### Does this PR need a docs update or release note?
- [x] ✅ Yes, it's included
- [ ] 🕐 Yes, but in a later PR
- [ ] ⛔ No
#### Type of change
- [x] 🌻 Feature
- [ ] 🐛 Bugfix
- [ ] 🗺️ Documentation
- [ ] 🤖 Supportability/Tests
- [ ] 💻 CI/Deployment
- [ ] 🧹 Tech Debt/Cleanup
#### Issue(s)
* closes#2486
#### Test Plan
- [x] 💪 Manual
- [x] ⚡ Unit test
- [ ] 💚 E2E
The sensitive-info flag allows CLI users to specify the Concealer algorithm used to handle PII and
other sensitive info in logging. Default alg is 'hash', which produces a truncated hmacsha256 string.
'mask' for flat '***' replacement and 'plaintext'
are also available.
SDK consumer are expected to configure clues
themselves, rather than specifying a config option.
---
#### Does this PR need a docs update or release note?
- [x] ⛔ No
#### Type of change
- [x] 🌻 Feature
#### Issue(s)
* #2024
#### Test Plan
- [x] 💪 Manual
- [x] ⚡ Unit test
In a case where the current manifests and the
fallback contain both distinct and overlapping
categories, the end result contains multiple
bases for the same category. Verifydistinctresons
didn't catch this because it includes the resource owner.
---
#### Does this PR need a docs update or release note?
- [x] ⛔ No
#### Type of change
- [x] 🐛 Bugfix
#### Issue(s)
* #2825
#### Test Plan
- [x] ⚡ Unit test
Failure can happen as the list of attachment and they data can get
pretty big.
---
#### Does this PR need a docs update or release note?
- [x] ✅ Yes, it's included
- [ ] 🕐 Yes, but in a later PR
- [ ] ⛔ No
#### Type of change
<!--- Please check the type of change your PR introduces: --->
- [ ] 🌻 Feature
- [x] 🐛 Bugfix
- [ ] 🗺️ Documentation
- [ ] 🤖 Supportability/Tests
- [ ] 💻 CI/Deployment
- [ ] 🧹 Tech Debt/Cleanup
#### Issue(s)
<!-- Can reference multiple issues. Use one of the following "magic words" - "closes, fixes" to auto-close the Github issue. -->
* #<issue>
#### Test Plan
<!-- How will this be tested prior to merging.-->
- [ ] 💪 Manual
- [x] ⚡ Unit test
- [ ] 💚 E2E
<!-- PR description-->
---
#### Does this PR need a docs update or release note?
- [ ] ⛔ No
#### Type of change
<!--- Please check the type of change your PR introduces: --->
- [ ] 🧹 Tech Debt/Cleanup
#### Issue(s)
<!-- Can reference multiple issues. Use one of the following "magic words" - "closes, fixes" to auto-close the Github issue. -->
* #<issue>
#### Test Plan
<!-- How will this be tested prior to merging.-->
- [ ] 💪 Manual
#### Does this PR need a docs update or release note?
- [x] ⛔ No
#### Type of change
- [x] 🧹 Tech Debt/Cleanup
#### Issue(s)
* #2024
#### Test Plan
- [x] ⚡ Unit test
Previously we were querying Graph to get the current permissions and then using that to compute the permission diff. This changes that to use the metadata that we have available locally to do the computation avoiding a graph call to get permissions.
<!-- PR description-->
---
#### Does this PR need a docs update or release note?
- [ ] ✅ Yes, it's included
- [ ] 🕐 Yes, but in a later PR
- [x] ⛔ No
#### Type of change
<!--- Please check the type of change your PR introduces: --->
- [x] 🌻 Feature
- [ ] 🐛 Bugfix
- [ ] 🗺️ Documentation
- [ ] 🤖 Supportability/Tests
- [ ] 💻 CI/Deployment
- [ ] 🧹 Tech Debt/Cleanup
#### Issue(s)
<!-- Can reference multiple issues. Use one of the following "magic words" - "closes, fixes" to auto-close the Github issue. -->
* fixes https://github.com/alcionai/corso/issues/2976
#### Test Plan
<!-- How will this be tested prior to merging.-->
- [ ] 💪 Manual
- [x] ⚡ Unit test
- [x] 💚 E2E
Ensure exchange always includes the delta metadata entry, even if it has zero deltaURLs to record.
---
#### Does this PR need a docs update or release note?
- [x] ⛔ No
#### Type of change
- [x] 🐛 Bugfix
#### Issue(s)
* fixes#3019
#### Test Plan
- [x] ⚡ Unit test
- [x] 💚 E2E
Adds compliance with clues.Concealer to the paths
package. Also introduces a new struct in the same
space: Elements, which is a thin wrapper around
a slice of strings so that subsections of a path
or builder can carry the same pii behavior
without additional work on the consumer's end.
---
#### Does this PR need a docs update or release note?
- [x] 🕐 Yes, but in a later PR
#### Type of change
- [x] 🌻 Feature
- [x] 🤖 Supportability/Tests
#### Issue(s)
* #2024
#### Test Plan
- [x] ⚡ Unit test
- [x] 💚 E2E
Includes fixups for calls that need updated
---
#### Does this PR need a docs update or release note?
- [ ] ✅ Yes, it's included
- [ ] 🕐 Yes, but in a later PR
- [x] ⛔ No
#### Type of change
- [ ] 🌻 Feature
- [ ] 🐛 Bugfix
- [ ] 🗺️ Documentation
- [x] 🤖 Test
- [x] 💻 CI/Deployment
- [x] 🧹 Tech Debt/Cleanup
#### Issue(s)
* #2373
#### Test Plan
- [x] 💪 Manual
- [ ] ⚡ Unit test
- [ ] 💚 E2E
We're dropping support for selection-by-url-suffix in sharepoint.
---
#### Does this PR need a docs update or release note?
- [x] ⛔ No
#### Type of change
- [x] 🧹 Tech Debt/Cleanup
#### Issue(s)
* #2825
#### Test Plan
- [x] ⚡ Unit test
- [x] 💚 E2E
Store all locations in the prefix matcher
and then look them up when merging details
Intermediate step to get things setup for
having OneDrive locations during merging
---
#### Does this PR need a docs update or release note?
- [ ] ✅ Yes, it's included
- [ ] 🕐 Yes, but in a later PR
- [x] ⛔ No
#### Type of change
- [x] 🌻 Feature
- [ ] 🐛 Bugfix
- [ ] 🗺️ Documentation
- [ ] 🤖 Supportability/Tests
- [ ] 💻 CI/Deployment
- [ ] 🧹 Tech Debt/Cleanup
#### Issue(s)
* #2486
#### Test Plan
- [x] 💪 Manual
- [x] ⚡ Unit test
- [ ] 💚 E2E
<!-- PR description-->
* Do not specify recurrenceTimeZone if it's not set in the item being
restored. "" is not a valid value
---
#### Does this PR need a docs update or release note?
- [x] ⛔ No
#### Type of change
<!--- Please check the type of change your PR introduces: --->
- [x] 🐛 Bugfix
#### Issue(s)
* COR-53
#### Test Plan
<!-- How will this be tested prior to merging.-->
- [x] 💚 E2E
Keeps the code from blocking and then failing immediately without sending a retry.
---
#### Does this PR need a docs update or release note?
- [ ] ✅ Yes, it's included
- [ ] 🕐 Yes, but in a later PR
- [x] ⛔ No
#### Type of change
- [ ] 🌻 Feature
- [ ] 🐛 Bugfix
- [ ] 🗺️ Documentation
- [ ] 🤖 Supportability/Tests
- [ ] 💻 CI/Deployment
- [x] 🧹 Tech Debt/Cleanup
#### Issue(s)
* closes#2882
#### Test Plan
- [ ] 💪 Manual
- [ ] ⚡ Unit test
- [ ] 💚 E2E
Adds a lookup step to graph connector to find
an owner's id and name given some identifier.
The identifier, for either sites or users, can be a
well formed id or name.
---
#### Does this PR need a docs update or release note?
- [x] ⛔ No
#### Type of change
- [x] 🌻 Feature
#### Issue(s)
* #2825
#### Test Plan
- [x] ⚡ Unit test
- [x] 💚 E2E
Adds an interface for GetUserInfo, which gets
corso-specific metadata for a single user. Also
does some refactoring around discovery for
better interface consistency, both as variables
and as access layers.
---
#### Does this PR need a docs update or release note?
- [x] ⛔ No
#### Type of change
- [x] 🌻 Feature
#### Test Plan
- [x] ⚡ Unit test
- [x] 💚 E2E
Add support for onedrive in getM365
---
#### Does this PR need a docs update or release note?
- [ ] ✅ Yes, it's included
- [ ] 🕐 Yes, but in a later PR
- [x] ⛔ No
#### Type of change
<!--- Please check the type of change your PR introduces: --->
- [x] 🌻 Feature
- [ ] 🐛 Bugfix
- [ ] 🗺️ Documentation
- [ ] 🤖 Test
- [ ] 💻 CI/Deployment
- [ ] 🧹 Tech Debt/Cleanup
#### Issue(s)
<!-- Can reference multiple issues. Use one of the following "magic words" - "closes, fixes" to auto-close the Github issue. -->
* #<issue>
#### Test Plan
<!-- How will this be tested prior to merging.-->
- [x] 💪 Manual
- [ ] ⚡ Unit test
- [ ] 💚 E2E
LocationRefs don't need prefix directories, so using a path.Path is
overkill. This will also fit better with changes to come where we need
to parse and update the LocationRef of merged backup details entries.
---
#### Does this PR need a docs update or release note?
- [ ] ✅ Yes, it's included
- [ ] 🕐 Yes, but in a later PR
- [x] ⛔ No
#### Type of change
- [ ] 🌻 Feature
- [ ] 🐛 Bugfix
- [ ] 🗺️ Documentation
- [ ] 🤖 Supportability/Tests
- [ ] 💻 CI/Deployment
- [x] 🧹 Tech Debt/Cleanup
#### Issue(s)
* #2486
#### Test Plan
- [x] 💪 Manual
- [ ] ⚡ Unit test
- [ ] 💚 E2E
Refactors the sharepoint site lookup to use the
id-to-name maps. This has a momentary regression
that will get solved in the next PR: we no longer
match on weburl suffixes, and instead require
a complete match.
Also, migrates the sharepoint lookup code out
of GC and into Discovery.
---
#### Does this PR need a docs update or release note?
- [x] ⛔ No
#### Type of change
- [x] 🌻 Feature
#### Issue(s)
* #2825
* #1995
* #1547
#### Test Plan
- [x] ⚡ Unit test
- [x] 💚 E2E
Adds a new package to common (pii) with a clues.
Concealer compliant struct that can log and report
url values with a mix of hidden pii and exposed
public values. Exposed values are based on
well-known graph api path and query params.
---
#### Does this PR need a docs update or release note?
- [x] 🕐 Yes, but in a later PR
#### Type of change
- [x] 🤖 Supportability/Tests
#### Issue(s)
* #2024
#### Test Plan
- [x] ⚡ Unit test
Adds two maps to resource-owner handling:
id-to-name and name-to-id. Expectation is that
these maps will either get populated by a caller
as a pre-process before initializing the gc client, or
gc will (later pr) be able to look up the owner and
populate those maps itself. The maps are
used to set the selector id and name for iface
compliance. Only supported by exchange in this PR.
---
#### Does this PR need a docs update or release note?
- [x] ⛔ No
#### Type of change
- [x] 🌻 Feature
#### Issue(s)
* #2825
#### Test Plan
- [x] ⚡ Unit test
- [x] 💚 E2E
Begins hiding PII with clues.Hide injections in our structured logging aggregators. This is a Non-
comprehensive change, and improvements here will be ongoing.
---
#### Does this PR need a docs update or release note?
- [x] 🕐 Yes, but in a later PR
#### Type of change
- [x] 🤖 Supportability/Tests
#### Issue(s)
* #2024
#### Test Plan
- [x] 💪 Manual
- [x] 💚 E2E
This was previously used to add retry logic which is no more the case as is a completely unnecessary indirection.
<!-- PR description-->
---
#### Does this PR need a docs update or release note?
- [ ] ✅ Yes, it's included
- [ ] 🕐 Yes, but in a later PR
- [x] ⛔ No
#### Type of change
<!--- Please check the type of change your PR introduces: --->
- [ ] 🌻 Feature
- [ ] 🐛 Bugfix
- [ ] 🗺️ Documentation
- [ ] 🤖 Supportability/Tests
- [ ] 💻 CI/Deployment
- [x] 🧹 Tech Debt/Cleanup
#### Issue(s)
<!-- Can reference multiple issues. Use one of the following "magic words" - "closes, fixes" to auto-close the Github issue. -->
* #<issue>
#### Test Plan
<!-- How will this be tested prior to merging.-->
- [x] 💪 Manual
- [ ] ⚡ Unit test
- [ ] 💚 E2E
Previously we had a flag that needed to be flipped to backup permissions. Now we always backup permissions.
- Should we wait till https://github.com/alcionai/corso/issues/2976 is done to do this
- Users will have to do a non incremental backup first as of now to get permissions. We should probably have some way to force this.
---
#### Does this PR need a docs update or release note?
- [x] ✅ Yes, it's included
- [ ] 🕐 Yes, but in a later PR
- [ ] ⛔ No
#### Type of change
<!--- Please check the type of change your PR introduces: --->
- [x] 🌻 Feature
- [ ] 🐛 Bugfix
- [ ] 🗺️ Documentation
- [ ] 🤖 Supportability/Tests
- [ ] 💻 CI/Deployment
- [ ] 🧹 Tech Debt/Cleanup
#### Issue(s)
<!-- Can reference multiple issues. Use one of the following "magic words" - "closes, fixes" to auto-close the Github issue. -->
* closes https://github.com/alcionai/corso/issues/2409
#### Test Plan
<!-- How will this be tested prior to merging.-->
- [ ] 💪 Manual
- [x] ⚡ Unit test
- [x] 💚 E2E
Adds a common interface: idNamer, which is used
to pass around tuples of an id and a name for some
resource. Also adds compliance to this iface in
selectors, where a selector's ID and Name are the
DiscreteOwner values.
---
#### Does this PR need a docs update or release note?
- [x] ⛔ No
#### Type of change
- [x] 🌻 Feature
#### Issue(s)
* #2825
#### Test Plan
- [x] ⚡ Unit test
- [x] 💚 E2E
Always populate the location field of backup details
for Exchange data types
Fix bug where ParentPath for calendar items used
folder IDs instead of display names
---
#### Does this PR need a docs update or release note?
- [x] ✅ Yes, it's included
- [ ] 🕐 Yes, but in a later PR
- [ ] ⛔ No
#### Type of change
- [x] 🌻 Feature
- [x] 🐛 Bugfix
- [ ] 🗺️ Documentation
- [ ] 🤖 Test
- [ ] 💻 CI/Deployment
- [ ] 🧹 Tech Debt/Cleanup
#### Issue(s)
* #2486
* closes#2827
merge after:
* #2826
* #2808
* #2828
#### Test Plan
- [x] 💪 Manual
- [ ] ⚡ Unit test
- [ ] 💚 E2E
Currently we were logging rate limiting values for 503 which is not available and end up with empty values. Switching it to logging the response, similar to 404 as that can be more useful.
<!-- PR description-->
---
#### Does this PR need a docs update or release note?
- [ ] ✅ Yes, it's included
- [ ] 🕐 Yes, but in a later PR
- [x] ⛔ No
#### Type of change
<!--- Please check the type of change your PR introduces: --->
- [ ] 🌻 Feature
- [ ] 🐛 Bugfix
- [ ] 🗺️ Documentation
- [x] 🤖 Supportability/Tests
- [ ] 💻 CI/Deployment
- [ ] 🧹 Tech Debt/Cleanup
#### Issue(s)
<!-- Can reference multiple issues. Use one of the following "magic words" - "closes, fixes" to auto-close the Github issue. -->
* #<issue>
#### Test Plan
<!-- How will this be tested prior to merging.-->
- [x] 💪 Manual
- [ ] ⚡ Unit test
- [ ] 💚 E2E
While fail-fast and best-effort make for good
categories at the extreme ends of error handling,
we keep finding outselves wanting to operate
in a middle ground. This change introduces a new
error handling category: FailAfterRecovery. This
option tells corso to complete as much of its
process as it can, even if it recovers from errors.
But at the end of processing, if it recovered from
any errors, an error is returned for the operation.
This behavior is the new failure handling default,
instead of failFast.
---
#### Does this PR need a docs update or release note?
- [x] ⛔ No
#### Type of change
- [x] 🌻 Feature
#### Test Plan
- [x] 💪 Manual
- [x] ⚡ Unit test
To avoid over-production of data, and thus longer
CI times, any sharepoint integration test that can scope
library usage down to only the "test" folders should do so.
---
#### Does this PR need a docs update or release note?
- [x] ⛔ No
#### Type of change
- [x] 🤖 Supportability/Tests
#### Test Plan
- [x] ⚡ Unit test
- [x] 💚 E2E
The observe PII handlers are getting replaced by
the more standardized clues secrets.
---
#### Does this PR need a docs update or release note?
- [x] ⛔ No
#### Type of change
- [x] 🧹 Tech Debt/Cleanup
#### Issue(s)
* #2024
#### Test Plan
- [x] 💪 Manual
- [x] 💚 E2E
Replaces the operations graphConnector reference
with an interface. Restore and Backups have
separate, unique interfaces.
<!-- PR description-->
---
#### Does this PR need a docs update or release note?
- [x] ⛔ No
#### Type of change
- [x] 🌻 Feature
#### Issue(s)
* #2825
#### Test Plan
- [x] ⚡ Unit test
- [x] 💚 E2E
OneNote files >2GB cannot be downloaded via the graph API. This change will gracefully skip them and prevent the backup from erroring out.
A OneNote file is represented by a Package(folder) which contains two file within it, `<file>.one` and `<file>.onetoc2`. From what I can tell the `onetoc2` file is the metadata file and the `one` file is the one that contains data and can get big.
**The current implementation has a limitation(or feature depending on how you see it) in that we will end up doing a partial backup with just the `onetoc2` file but avoiding the big `one` file if that is big.**
I did not try to change the behaviour as even currently if for somehow we ended up with an error like 404 when trying to backup one of these files, we do skip it. I've added a comment in for now, let me know if we should go back and revisit the behaviour. *The main issue is the fact that we only hit this problem once it reaches kopia and removing it at that point is harder.*
---
#### Does this PR need a docs update or release note?
- [x] ✅ Yes, it's included
- [ ] 🕐 Yes, but in a later PR
- [ ] ⛔ No
#### Type of change
<!--- Please check the type of change your PR introduces: --->
- [ ] 🌻 Feature
- [x] 🐛 Bugfix
- [ ] 🗺️ Documentation
- [ ] 🤖 Supportability/Tests
- [ ] 💻 CI/Deployment
- [ ] 🧹 Tech Debt/Cleanup
#### Issue(s)
<!-- Can reference multiple issues. Use one of the following "magic words" - "closes, fixes" to auto-close the Github issue. -->
* fixes https://github.com/alcionai/corso/issues/2910
#### Test Plan
<!-- How will this be tested prior to merging.-->
- [ ] 💪 Manual
- [x] ⚡ Unit test
- [ ] 💚 E2E
in order to avoid errors cascading from graph API's
populated 204 responses containing `0/r/n/r/n`,
in particular in response to deletes, this change
hacks in the creation of a unique http client for
each delete call.
This is dangerous to do, since we already know
that generating clients per calls can leak
consumption of system resources such as sockets.
This change presumes that runtime deletes are
minimally, if ever, called during standard backup
and restore. The permission deletion in onedrive
is the stand-out exception that might need some
additional investigation.
---
#### Does this PR need a docs update or release note?
- [x] ⛔ No
#### Type of change
- [x] 🤖 Supportability/Tests
#### Issue(s)
* #2707
#### Test Plan
- [x] ⚡ Unit test
- [x] 💚 E2E
Moves the generation of graphConnector to the
NewBackupOp and NewRestoreOp constructors
inside the repository. This removes gc creation
from the backup and restore operations, and
requires a reference to gc to exist in operations.
This sets up two changes: 1/ mocking of GC
within operation (the next PR will replace it with
an interface). 2/ the ability to perform a gc
validation step within the operation construction,
and thus the capacity to look up a resource owner
display name or id, and vice versa.
---
#### Does this PR need a docs update or release note?
- [x] ⛔ No
#### Type of change
- [x] 🌻 Feature
#### Issue(s)
* #2825
#### Test Plan
- [x] ⚡ Unit test
- [x] 💚 E2E
#### Does this PR need a docs update or release note?
- [x] ⛔ No
#### Type of change
- [x] 🧹 Tech Debt/Cleanup
#### Issue(s)
* #1970
#### Test Plan
- [x] ⚡ Unit test
This adds basic integration tests for backing up permissions in OneDrive.
*https://github.com/alcionai/corso/issues/2790 could be a good follow up to this.*
---
#### Does this PR need a docs update or release note?
- [ ] ✅ Yes, it's included
- [ ] 🕐 Yes, but in a later PR
- [x] ⛔ No
#### Type of change
<!--- Please check the type of change your PR introduces: --->
- [ ] 🌻 Feature
- [ ] 🐛 Bugfix
- [ ] 🗺️ Documentation
- [x] 🤖 Supportability/Tests
- [ ] 💻 CI/Deployment
- [ ] 🧹 Tech Debt/Cleanup
#### Issue(s)
<!-- Can reference multiple issues. Use one of the following "magic words" - "closes, fixes" to auto-close the Github issue. -->
* fixes https://github.com/alcionai/corso/issues/2772
#### Test Plan
<!-- How will this be tested prior to merging.-->
- [ ] 💪 Manual
- [ ] ⚡ Unit test
- [x] 💚 E2E
Always generate both a path of IDs and a path of
display names for folders in the container resolver.
Changes in internal/connector/exchange/service_functions.go
keep the behavior of the overall system from changing
---
#### Does this PR need a docs update or release note?
- [ ] ✅ Yes, it's included
- [ ] 🕐 Yes, but in a later PR
- [x] ⛔ No
#### Type of change
- [x] 🌻 Feature
- [ ] 🐛 Bugfix
- [ ] 🗺️ Documentation
- [ ] 🤖 Test
- [ ] 💻 CI/Deployment
- [x] 🧹 Tech Debt/Cleanup
#### Issue(s)
* #2486
merge after:
* #2808
#### Test Plan
- [x] 💪 Manual
- [x] ⚡ Unit test
- [ ] 💚 E2E
Updates and corrects input aliasing according to
the following rules (in priority order):
1. if the library name is usable, use it
2. if not, alias to the package name
3. if the package name is weird, alias sensibly
4. in case of collision, alias more distant imports
5. aliases should be consistent throughout
---
#### Does this PR need a docs update or release note?
- [x] ⛔ No
#### Type of change
- [x] 🧹 Tech Debt/Cleanup
#### Issue(s)
* #1970
#### Test Plan
- [x] ⚡ Unit test
