<!-- Insert PR description-->
Updates for `./corso backup details sharepoint --backup <bID>`
- Ensures that Drive Name is part of the backup
- Adds field DisplayName to backup details
#### Does this PR need a docs update or release note?
- [x] ⛔ No
#### Type of change
<!--- Please check the type of change your PR introduces: --->
- [x] 🌻 Feature
#### Issue(s)
<!-- Can reference multiple issues. Use one of the following "magic words" - "closes, fixes" to auto-close the Github issue. -->
*closes #2601 <issue>
#### Test Plan
<!-- How will this be tested prior to merging.-->
- [x] 💪 Manual
This will help us pin point the file which caused issues and can be
used to debug the specific file.
<!-- Insert PR description-->
---
#### Does this PR need a docs update or release note?
- [ ] ✅ Yes, it's included
- [ ] 🕐 Yes, but in a later PR
- [x] ⛔ No
#### Type of change
<!--- Please check the type of change your PR introduces: --->
- [ ] 🌻 Feature
- [x] 🐛 Bugfix
- [ ] 🗺️ Documentation
- [ ] 🤖 Test
- [ ] 💻 CI/Deployment
- [x] 🧹 Tech Debt/Cleanup
#### Issue(s)
<!-- Can reference multiple issues. Use one of the following "magic words" - "closes, fixes" to auto-close the Github issue. -->
* #<issue>
#### Test Plan
<!-- How will this be tested prior to merging.-->
- [x] 💪 Manual
- [ ] ⚡ Unit test
- [ ] 💚 E2E
## Description
Renaming the funcs in the fault
package to be more clear about
their purpose and behavior. Largely
just find&replace changes, except
for fault.go and the fault examples.
## Does this PR need a docs update or release note?
- [x] ⛔ No
## Type of change
- [x] 🧹 Tech Debt/Cleanup
## Issue(s)
* #1970
## Test Plan
- [x] ⚡ Unit test
- [x] 💚 E2E
## Description
Skip connector subpackage for now as that is fairly large in itself.
## Does this PR need a docs update or release note?
- [ ] ✅ Yes, it's included
- [ ] 🕐 Yes, but in a later PR
- [x] ⛔ No
## Type of change
- [ ] 🌻 Feature
- [ ] 🐛 Bugfix
- [ ] 🗺️ Documentation
- [ ] 🤖 Test
- [ ] 💻 CI/Deployment
- [x] 🧹 Tech Debt/Cleanup
## Issue(s)
* #2373
## Test Plan
- [x] 💪 Manual
- [ ] ⚡ Unit test
- [ ] 💚 E2E
## Description
General cleanup/consolidation of code for getting OneDrive collections during backup. Few minor changes to behavior:
* always return a collection for the root folder even if it's empty
* add items to the exclude list only after they've been added to a collection. This gives a better chance of preserving the item even if we encounter an error parsing paths or something. If there's a failure, the old version of the item is most likely to be preserved (this varies based on whether the item is returned in multiple delta results during the backup)
## Does this PR need a docs update or release note?
- [ ] ✅ Yes, it's included
- [ ] 🕐 Yes, but in a later PR
- [x] ⛔ No
## Type of change
- [ ] 🌻 Feature
- [ ] 🐛 Bugfix
- [ ] 🗺️ Documentation
- [ ] 🤖 Test
- [ ] 💻 CI/Deployment
- [x] 🧹 Tech Debt/Cleanup
## Issue(s)
* #2447
## Test Plan
- [ ] 💪 Manual
- [x] ⚡ Unit test
- [ ] 💚 E2E
## Does this PR need a docs update or release note?
- [x] ⛔ No
## Type of change
- [x] 🧹 Tech Debt/Cleanup
## Issue(s)
* #1970
## Test Plan
- [x] ⚡ Unit test
- [x] 💚 E2E
## Does this PR need a docs update or release note?
- [ ] ⛔ No
## Type of change
- [x] 🧹 Tech Debt/Cleanup
## Issue(s)
* #1970
## Test Plan
- [x] ⚡ Unit test
- [x] 💚 E2E
Consolidate tests for OneDrive permissions so that we don't end up running as many tests total. Behavior checked in old version of tests is still checked in the consolidated test.
This consolidation will help keep data production under control and thus reduce the chance of throttling in CI. The main driver behind this is the addition of the ability to easily test different versions and the desire to ensure old versions still behave as expected. However, with the increasing number of versions we have this leads to many tests.
---
#### Does this PR need a docs update or release note?
- [ ] ✅ Yes, it's included
- [ ] 🕐 Yes, but in a later PR
- [x] ⛔ No
#### Type of change
- [ ] 🌻 Feature
- [ ] 🐛 Bugfix
- [ ] 🗺️ Documentation
- [x] 🤖 Test
- [ ] 💻 CI/Deployment
- [x] 🧹 Tech Debt/Cleanup
#### Issue(s)
* closes#2636
#### Test Plan
- [ ] 💪 Manual
- [x] ⚡ Unit test
- [ ] 💚 E2E
## Description
This PR does a couple of things, some of which are to make storing the directory metadata in the directory easier:
* backup empty folders
* expand what selectors match on slightly so it includes the folder specified in the selector (e.x. match on prefix `/foo` will now include the folder `/foo` and subfolders under it)
* add restore code path for having directory metadata in the directory
* update backup code path to store directory metadata in the directory
* bump the backup version so we can tell this apart from the previous version
The above should mostly be split out by commit if that makes reviewing easier
Storing the directory metadata in the directory allows removing the data dependency between
restoring parent directories and child directories (though there may still be a dependency there for permissions inheritance). This makes it so that the order kopia returns restore data does not matter
It also unblocks some of the OneDrive delta token-based incremental backup work as we no longer have to worry about directory metadata when moving/deleting a directory
## Does this PR need a docs update or release note?
- [ ] ✅ Yes, it's included
- [ ] 🕐 Yes, but in a later PR
- [x] ⛔ No
## Type of change
- [x] 🌻 Feature
- [ ] 🐛 Bugfix
- [ ] 🗺️ Documentation
- [ ] 🤖 Test
- [ ] 💻 CI/Deployment
- [ ] 🧹 Tech Debt/Cleanup
## Issue(s)
* closes#2447
* closes#2532
## Test Plan
- [ ] 💪 Manual
- [x] ⚡ Unit test
- [ ] 💚 E2E
## Description
SharePoint details has a field `ParentPath`. This PR populates that field.
Requires an additional call per collection to retrieve the Site's webURL.
<!-- Insert PR description-->
## Does this PR need a docs update or release note?
- [x] ⛔ No
## Type of change
- [x] 🧹 Tech Debt/Cleanup
## Test Plan
<!-- How will this be tested prior to merging.-->
- [x] 💪 Manual
## Does this PR need a docs update or release note?
- [ ] ✅ Yes, it's included
- [ ] 🕐 Yes, but in a later PR
- [x] ⛔ No
## Type of change
- [ ] 🌻 Feature
- [ ] 🐛 Bugfix
- [ ] 🗺️ Documentation
- [ ] 🤖 Test
- [ ] 💻 CI/Deployment
- [x] 🧹 Tech Debt/Cleanup
## Issue(s)
* #2373
## Test Plan
- [x] 💪 Manual
- [ ] ⚡ Unit test
- [ ] 💚 E2E
## Description
Sanitization steps added for event transformation for restore.
<!-- Insert PR description-->
## Does this PR need a docs update or release note?
- [x] ⛔ No
## Type of change
- [x] 🐛 Bugfix
## Issue(s)
<!-- Can reference multiple issues. Use one of the following "magic words" - "closes, fixes" to auto-close the Github issue. -->
* closes #2490<issue>
## Test Plan
<!-- How will this be tested prior to merging.-->
- [x] 💪 Manual
## Description
Creates two files. One for Permissions and another for onedrive/data_collections.
1. Is a file used to hold all the permission specific functions for `OneDrive`. These may need to be leveraged in the future for SharePoint.
2. Previously, the backup function for `OneDrive` was housed within the graph connector data collections file. All other applications have their code housed within their respective directories. Moved the increment graph connector messages outside of the function to match the other applications.
<!-- Insert PR description-->
## Does this PR need a docs update or release note?
- [x] ⛔ No
## Type of change
<!--- Please check the type of change your PR introduces: --->
- [x] 🧹 Tech Debt/Cleanup
## Test Plan
- [x] ⚡ Unit test
- [x] 💚 E2E
## Description
Remove the display and interaction with .meta
files from details entries.
## Does this PR need a docs update or release note?
- [x] ✅ Yes, it's included
## Type of change
- [x] 🐛 Bugfix
## Test Plan
- [x] ⚡ Unit test
## Does this PR need a docs update or release note?
- [x] ⛔ No
## Type of change
- [x] 🧹 Tech Debt/Cleanup
## Issue(s)
* #1970
## Test Plan
- [x] ⚡ Unit test
- [x] 💚 E2E
## Description
The `GetUri()` call contains side-effects which drain the builder of its constructed url data. As a result, running a backup with CORSO_URL_LOGGING actually forces the bug to manifest unintentionally.
## Does this PR need a docs update or release note?
- [x] ✅ Yes, it's included
## Type of change
- [x] 🐛 Bugfix
## Test Plan
- [x] 💪 Manual
## Description
Update CI domain used for testing
## Does this PR need a docs update or release note?
- [ ] ✅ Yes, it's included
- [ ] 🕐 Yes, but in a later PR
- [x] ⛔ No
## Type of change
<!--- Please check the type of change your PR introduces: --->
- [ ] 🌻 Feature
- [ ] 🐛 Bugfix
- [ ] 🗺️ Documentation
- [ ] 🤖 Test
- [x] 💻 CI/Deployment
- [ ] 🧹 Tech Debt/Cleanup
## Description
Add extra information about errors to aid in debugging/reporting to the user
## Does this PR need a docs update or release note?
- [ ] ✅ Yes, it's included
- [ ] 🕐 Yes, but in a later PR
- [x] ⛔ No
## Type of change
- [ ] 🌻 Feature
- [ ] 🐛 Bugfix
- [ ] 🗺️ Documentation
- [ ] 🤖 Test
- [ ] 💻 CI/Deployment
- [x] 🧹 Tech Debt/Cleanup
## Issue(s)
* closes#2581
## Test Plan
- [ ] 💪 Manual
- [ ] ⚡ Unit test
- [ ] 💚 E2E
## Description
Realized we had a race condition: in an async
runtime it's possible for an errs.Err() to be
returned by multiple functions, even though that
Err() was only sourced by one of them. The
addition of a tracker contains the returned
error into the scope of that func so that only
the error produced in the current iteration is
returned.
## Does this PR need a docs update or release note?
- [x] ⛔ No
## Type of change
- [x] 🧹 Tech Debt/Cleanup
## Issue(s)
* #1970
## Test Plan
- [x] ⚡ Unit test
- [x] 💚 E2E
## Description
Changes:
- Use of `ptr` package to ensure safe dereferencing of pointers
- Update to query to ensure that `sharepointIds` are part of the response
- Alternate method created to obtain originating sharepoint site url
<!-- Insert PR description-->
## Does this PR need a docs update or release note?
- [x] ⛔ No
## Type of change
<!--- Please check the type of change your PR introduces: --->
- [x] 🌻 Feature
- [x] 🐛 Bugfix
## Issue(s)
<!-- Can reference multiple issues. Use one of the following "magic words" - "closes, fixes" to auto-close the Github issue. -->
* closes #1747<issue>
## Test Plan
<!-- How will this be tested prior to merging.-->
- [x] 💪 Manual
## Description
fault is aggregating recoverable errors, but no code currently reports them. This is a quick hack to add logging around those errors. In the future, we'll want to refine who and where performs this report.
## Does this PR need a docs update or release note?
- [x] ⛔ No
## Type of change
- [x] 🧹 Tech Debt/Cleanup
## Issue(s)
* #1970
## Test Plan
- [x] 💪 Manual
## Does this PR need a docs update or release note?
- [x] ⛔ No
## Type of change
- [x] 🧹 Tech Debt/Cleanup
## Issue(s)
* #2529
## Test Plan
- [x] ⚡ Unit test
## Description
Major changes:
* OneDrive files now store the lookup key in the first few bytes of the
file and then the file data. This allows the test framework to
continue working even when we switch to using item IDs as names
* Create a framework to create the data necessary for testing. This
framework uses something akin to the builder pattern and automatically
adds files to the collection if they should appear in that version.
For example, trying to add a metadata file to a backup version that
didn't have metadata files will result in a noop. Adding files will
also add the metadata to the aux file set
Long term this will hopefully make ensuring compatibility between OneDrive
versions easier because only a few places in the code need to be updated
to support another version. It also allows easy ranges over different
versions via for-loop
## Does this PR need a docs update or release note?
- [ ] ✅ Yes, it's included
- [ ] 🕐 Yes, but in a later PR
- [x] ⛔ No
## Type of change
- [ ] 🌻 Feature
- [ ] 🐛 Bugfix
- [ ] 🗺️ Documentation
- [x] 🤖 Test
- [ ] 💻 CI/Deployment
- [ ] 🧹 Tech Debt/Cleanup
## Issue(s)
* #1535
## Test Plan
- [ ] 💪 Manual
- [x] ⚡ Unit test
- [ ] 💚 E2E
## Description
This makes sure both the `.data` and `.meta` files for a OneDrive item are added to the exclude list so that both are deleted. It does nothing for dirs as of now as we will be moving the directory metadata to within the directory so that we can leverage kopia tree operations to take care of that.
## Does this PR need a docs update or release note?
- [ ] ✅ Yes, it's included
- [ ] 🕐 Yes, but in a later PR
- [ ] ⛔ No
## Type of change
<!--- Please check the type of change your PR introduces: --->
- [ ] 🌻 Feature
- [ ] 🐛 Bugfix
- [ ] 🗺️ Documentation
- [ ] 🤖 Test
- [ ] 💻 CI/Deployment
- [ ] 🧹 Tech Debt/Cleanup
## Issue(s)
<!-- Can reference multiple issues. Use one of the following "magic words" - "closes, fixes" to auto-close the Github issue. -->
* https://github.com/alcionai/corso/issues/2117
## Test Plan
<!-- How will this be tested prior to merging.-->
- [ ] 💪 Manual
- [ ] ⚡ Unit test
- [ ] 💚 E2E
## Description
It is possible that within a single delta query that files could be moved multiple times, this fixes that.
## Does this PR need a docs update or release note?
- [ ] ✅ Yes, it's included
- [x] 🕐 Yes, but in a later PR
- [ ] ⛔ No
## Type of change
<!--- Please check the type of change your PR introduces: --->
- [x] 🌻 Feature
- [ ] 🐛 Bugfix
- [ ] 🗺️ Documentation
- [ ] 🤖 Test
- [ ] 💻 CI/Deployment
- [ ] 🧹 Tech Debt/Cleanup
## Issue(s)
<!-- Can reference multiple issues. Use one of the following "magic words" - "closes, fixes" to auto-close the Github issue. -->
* fixes https://github.com/alcionai/corso/issues/2559
## Test Plan
<!-- How will this be tested prior to merging.-->
- [ ] 💪 Manual
- [x] ⚡ Unit test
- [ ] 💚 E2E
## Description
<!-- Insert PR description-->
## Does this PR need a docs update or release note?
- [ ] ✅ Yes, it's included
- [x] 🕐 Yes, but in a later PR
- [ ] ⛔ No
## Type of change
<!--- Please check the type of change your PR introduces: --->
- [x] 🌻 Feature
- [ ] 🐛 Bugfix
- [ ] 🗺️ Documentation
- [ ] 🤖 Test
- [ ] 💻 CI/Deployment
- [ ] 🧹 Tech Debt/Cleanup
## Issue(s)
<!-- Can reference multiple issues. Use one of the following "magic words" - "closes, fixes" to auto-close the Github issue. -->
* Final entry : closes https://github.com/alcionai/corso/issues/2242
## Test Plan
<!-- How will this be tested prior to merging.-->
- [ ] 💪 Manual
- [x] ⚡ Unit test
- [ ] 💚 E2E
## Description
Add code to restore items that have their file name stored in the corso metadata file instead of as the name of the kopia file.
This code is not executed as the conditional for it will not trigger (comparison to max int)
## Does this PR need a docs update or release note?
- [ ] ✅ Yes, it's included
- [ ] 🕐 Yes, but in a later PR
- [x] ⛔ No
## Type of change
- [x] 🌻 Feature
- [ ] 🐛 Bugfix
- [ ] 🗺️ Documentation
- [ ] 🤖 Test
- [ ] 💻 CI/Deployment
- [ ] 🧹 Tech Debt/Cleanup
## Issue(s)
* #1535
## Test Plan
- [x] 💪 Manual
- [ ] ⚡ Unit test
- [ ] 💚 E2E
## Description
This starts to store the name of the OneDrive file/directory in the corso metadata file for the OneDrive file/directory. This data is not yet used anywhere
## Does this PR need a docs update or release note?
- [ ] ✅ Yes, it's included
- [ ] 🕐 Yes, but in a later PR
- [x] ⛔ No
## Type of change
- [x] 🌻 Feature
- [ ] 🐛 Bugfix
- [ ] 🗺️ Documentation
- [ ] 🤖 Test
- [ ] 💻 CI/Deployment
- [ ] 🧹 Tech Debt/Cleanup
## Issue(s)
* #1535
## Test Plan
- [x] 💪 Manual
- [ ] ⚡ Unit test
- [ ] 💚 E2E
## Description
Use the check to see if a user has access to OneDrive/Exchange to also see if the user exists. This does not stop the population of GraphConnector users every time an instance is created, but does move us one step closer to that
Manually tested the following cases:
* backup "*"
* backup single existing user without error
* backup multiple existing users without error
* error when attempting to backup user that doesn't exist in the same domain
* error when attempting to backup user that doesn't exist in a different domain
Sample error output (progress disabled):
```text
No backups available
Error: 1 error occurred:
* Failed to run Exchange backup for user foo@other.onmicrosoft.com: doing backup: producing backup data collections: resource owner [foo@other.onmicrosoft.com] not found within tenant
```
## Does this PR need a docs update or release note?
- [ ] ✅ Yes, it's included
- [ ] 🕐 Yes, but in a later PR
- [x] ⛔ No
## Type of change
- [ ] 🌻 Feature
- [ ] 🐛 Bugfix
- [ ] 🗺️ Documentation
- [ ] 🤖 Test
- [ ] 💻 CI/Deployment
- [x] 🧹 Tech Debt/Cleanup
## Issue(s)
* #1547
## Test Plan
- [x] 💪 Manual
- [ ] ⚡ Unit test
- [ ] 💚 E2E
## Description
Print api response in logs for 4xx errors from GC. More info for things like 400 Bad Request could be useful.
## Does this PR need a docs update or release note?
- [ ] ✅ Yes, it's included
- [ ] 🕐 Yes, but in a later PR
- [x] ⛔ No
## Type of change
<!--- Please check the type of change your PR introduces: --->
- [ ] 🌻 Feature
- [ ] 🐛 Bugfix
- [ ] 🗺️ Documentation
- [ ] 🤖 Test
- [ ] 💻 CI/Deployment
- [x] 🧹 Tech Debt/Cleanup
## Issue(s)
<!-- Can reference multiple issues. Use one of the following "magic words" - "closes, fixes" to auto-close the Github issue. -->
* #<issue>
## Test Plan
<!-- How will this be tested prior to merging.-->
- [x] 💪 Manual
- [ ] ⚡ Unit test
- [ ] 💚 E2E
## Does this PR need a docs update or release note?
- [x] ⛔ No
## Type of change
- [x] 🧹 Tech Debt/Cleanup
## Issue(s)
* #1970
## Test Plan
- [x] ⚡ Unit test
- [x] 💚 E2E
## Does this PR need a docs update or release note?
- [x] ⛔ No
## Type of change
- [x] 🧹 Tech Debt/Cleanup
## Issue(s)
* #1970
## Test Plan
- [x] ⚡ Unit test
- [x] 💚 E2E
## Description
This should help in figuring out more retry failures.
## Does this PR need a docs update or release note?
- [ ] ✅ Yes, it's included
- [ ] 🕐 Yes, but in a later PR
- [x] ⛔ No
## Type of change
<!--- Please check the type of change your PR introduces: --->
- [ ] 🌻 Feature
- [ ] 🐛 Bugfix
- [ ] 🗺️ Documentation
- [ ] 🤖 Test
- [ ] 💻 CI/Deployment
- [x] 🧹 Tech Debt/Cleanup
## Issue(s)
<!-- Can reference multiple issues. Use one of the following "magic words" - "closes, fixes" to auto-close the Github issue. -->
* #<issue>
## Test Plan
<!-- How will this be tested prior to merging.-->
- [x] 💪 Manual
- [ ] ⚡ Unit test
- [ ] 💚 E2E
## Description
Record the number of entries in the saved metadata. This could help catch odd situations like not finding anything to backup.
## Does this PR need a docs update or release note?
- [ ] ✅ Yes, it's included
- [ ] 🕐 Yes, but in a later PR
- [x] ⛔ No
## Type of change
- [ ] 🌻 Feature
- [ ] 🐛 Bugfix
- [ ] 🗺️ Documentation
- [ ] 🤖 Test
- [ ] 💻 CI/Deployment
- [x] 🧹 Tech Debt/Cleanup
## Issue(s)
* #2550
## Test Plan
- [x] 💪 Manual
- [ ] ⚡ Unit test
- [ ] 💚 E2E
## Does this PR need a docs update or release note?
- [x] ⛔ No
## Type of change
- [x] 🧹 Tech Debt/Cleanup
## Issue(s)
* #1970
## Test Plan
- [x] ⚡ Unit test
- [x] 💚 E2E
## Description
Pulls in fix for a panic caused by concurrent map updates in the clues pkg
## Does this PR need a docs update or release note?
- [ ] ✅ Yes, it's included
- [ ] 🕐 Yes, but in a later PR
- [x] ⛔ No
## Type of change
<!--- Please check the type of change your PR introduces: --->
- [ ] 🌻 Feature
- [x] 🐛 Bugfix
- [ ] 🗺️ Documentation
- [ ] 🤖 Test
- [ ] 💻 CI/Deployment
- [ ] 🧹 Tech Debt/Cleanup
## Test Plan
<!-- How will this be tested prior to merging.-->
- [ ] 💪 Manual
- [x] ⚡ Unit test
- [x] 💚 E2E
## Description
- Use of ptr package for next link and delta links.
- Added logging to verify the presence of receiving invalid next links from M365.
<!-- Insert PR description-->
## Does this PR need a docs update or release note?
- [x] ⛔ No
- Related to #2520
## Type of change
- [x] 🧹 Tech Debt/Cleanup
## Test Plan
<!-- How will this be tested prior to merging.-->
- [x] ⚡ Unit test
## Does this PR need a docs update or release note?
- [x] ⛔ No
## Type of change
- [x] 🧹 Tech Debt/Cleanup
## Issue(s)
* #1970
## Test Plan
- [x] ⚡ Unit test
- [x] 💚 E2E
## Description
Using this over extracting errors from the snapshot allows us to see all errors. The errors that each directory tracks are truncated when the directory is serialized for persistence if there're too many.
With the current `fault.Errors` behavior this cases the backup to fail if there's any errors
kopia ignored. This is consistent with behavior in the backup op that checks for any errors.
Unclear what the CLI output and log messages will be for these errors as they are grouped
into all other errors reported through the fault package
## Does this PR need a docs update or release note?
- [ ] ✅ Yes, it's included
- [ ] 🕐 Yes, but in a later PR
- [x] ⛔ No
## Type of change
- [ ] 🌻 Feature
- [x] 🐛 Bugfix
- [ ] 🗺️ Documentation
- [ ] 🤖 Test
- [ ] 💻 CI/Deployment
- [ ] 🧹 Tech Debt/Cleanup
## Issue(s)
* #2548
## Test Plan
- [ ] 💪 Manual
- [x] ⚡ Unit test
- [ ] 💚 E2E
## Description
This allows corso to continue making a snapshot even if the expected directory in the base is not found. The fact that the entry wasn't found will be logged
This should be safe so long as backups that had any sort of error, including "non-catastrophic" errors are marked as failed. Marking those as failed ensures that corso is using a matched set of metadata and data in the base snapshot rather than a partial snapshot
## Does this PR need a docs update or release note?
- [ ] ✅ Yes, it's included
- [x] 🕐 Yes, but in a later PR
- [ ] ⛔ No
## Type of change
- [ ] 🌻 Feature
- [x] 🐛 Bugfix
- [ ] 🗺️ Documentation
- [ ] 🤖 Test
- [ ] 💻 CI/Deployment
- [ ] 🧹 Tech Debt/Cleanup
## Issue(s)
* #2550
## Test Plan
- [ ] 💪 Manual
- [x] ⚡ Unit test
- [ ] 💚 E2E
## Description
Just handing the base directory to kopia doesn't let us see which items have been added which means we can't properly merge backup details later on.
Future implementations could do backup details merging based on path prefixes which could fix this problem.
## Does this PR need a docs update or release note?
- [ ] ✅ Yes, it's included
- [ ] 🕐 Yes, but in a later PR
- [x] ⛔ No
## Type of change
- [ ] 🌻 Feature
- [x] 🐛 Bugfix
- [ ] 🗺️ Documentation
- [ ] 🤖 Test
- [ ] 💻 CI/Deployment
- [ ] 🧹 Tech Debt/Cleanup
## Issue(s)
* closes#2521
## Test Plan
- [ ] 💪 Manual
- [x] ⚡ Unit test
- [ ] 💚 E2E
## Description
In order for corso to track recoverable errors,
we need to pass a fault.Errors struct into the
items stream. As long as we're doing that, we
might as well pass along the available ctx as well.
## Does this PR need a docs update or release note?
- [x] ⛔ No
## Type of change
- [x] 🧹 Tech Debt/Cleanup
## Issue(s)
* #1970
## Test Plan
- [x] ⚡ Unit test
- [x] 💚 E2E
## Description
- parentReference for deleted items will not have path.
- GC was not responding with deleted state
- Deleted items are not streamed by kopia
Borrows some changes from https://github.com/alcionai/corso/pull/2503/files as that might be delayed with on merge. Will rebase that if this gets merged fist.
## Does this PR need a docs update or release note?
- [ ] ✅ Yes, it's included
- [x] 🕐 Yes, but in a later PR
- [ ] ⛔ No
## Type of change
<!--- Please check the type of change your PR introduces: --->
- [x] 🌻 Feature
- [ ] 🐛 Bugfix
- [ ] 🗺️ Documentation
- [ ] 🤖 Test
- [ ] 💻 CI/Deployment
- [ ] 🧹 Tech Debt/Cleanup
## Issue(s)
<!-- Can reference multiple issues. Use one of the following "magic words" - "closes, fixes" to auto-close the Github issue. -->
* https://github.com/alcionai/corso/issues/2117
* fixes https://github.com/alcionai/corso/issues/2517
## Test Plan
<!-- How will this be tested prior to merging.-->
- [ ] 💪 Manual
- [x] ⚡ Unit test
- [ ] 💚 E2E
## Description
Use the new suite.Suite wrappers in tester package. Also update suite.Run and some nolint directives.
## Does this PR need a docs update or release note?
- [ ] ✅ Yes, it's included
- [ ] 🕐 Yes, but in a later PR
- [x] ⛔ No
## Type of change
- [ ] 🌻 Feature
- [ ] 🐛 Bugfix
- [ ] 🗺️ Documentation
- [x] 🤖 Test
- [ ] 💻 CI/Deployment
- [x] 🧹 Tech Debt/Cleanup
## Issue(s)
* #2373
## Test Plan
- [ ] 💪 Manual
- [x] ⚡ Unit test
- [ ] 💚 E2E
## Does this PR need a docs update or release note?
- [ ] ✅ Yes, it's included
- [ ] 🕐 Yes, but in a later PR
- [x] ⛔ No
## Type of change
- [ ] 🌻 Feature
- [ ] 🐛 Bugfix
- [ ] 🗺️ Documentation
- [x] 🤖 Test
- [ ] 💻 CI/Deployment
- [x] 🧹 Tech Debt/Cleanup
## Issue(s)
* #2373
## Test Plan
- [ ] 💪 Manual
- [x] ⚡ Unit test
- [ ] 💚 E2E
## Description
Folders replaced after a delete should not have their subfolders reparented to the new folder.
## Does this PR need a docs update or release note?
- [ ] ✅ Yes, it's included
- [ ] 🕐 Yes, but in a later PR
- [x] ⛔ No
## Type of change
- [ ] 🌻 Feature
- [ ] 🐛 Bugfix
- [ ] 🗺️ Documentation
- [x] 🤖 Test
- [ ] 💻 CI/Deployment
- [ ] 🧹 Tech Debt/Cleanup
## Test Plan
- [ ] 💪 Manual
- [x] ⚡ Unit test
- [ ] 💚 E2E
