This will help us while this is still in development. We should be
able to add in features without affecting anything else.
Once we have it in a more or less stable state this can be removed
completely.
## Description
Add extra information about errors to aid in debugging/reporting to the user
## Does this PR need a docs update or release note?
- [ ] ✅ Yes, it's included
- [ ] 🕐 Yes, but in a later PR
- [x] ⛔ No
## Type of change
- [ ] 🌻 Feature
- [ ] 🐛 Bugfix
- [ ] 🗺️ Documentation
- [ ] 🤖 Test
- [ ] 💻 CI/Deployment
- [x] 🧹 Tech Debt/Cleanup
## Issue(s)
* closes#2581
## Test Plan
- [ ] 💪 Manual
- [ ] ⚡ Unit test
- [ ] 💚 E2E
## Description
Realized we had a race condition: in an async
runtime it's possible for an errs.Err() to be
returned by multiple functions, even though that
Err() was only sourced by one of them. The
addition of a tracker contains the returned
error into the scope of that func so that only
the error produced in the current iteration is
returned.
## Does this PR need a docs update or release note?
- [x] ⛔ No
## Type of change
- [x] 🧹 Tech Debt/Cleanup
## Issue(s)
* #1970
## Test Plan
- [x] ⚡ Unit test
- [x] 💚 E2E
OneDrive poses a new problem for these tests when permissions are being
checked. Namely, we don't have the permissions for the root directory
(right now), but when we do the backup to check what was restored we
pull the permissions for the root of the subtree we backup (due to
restore as copy behavior).
This commit keeps the framework from comparing metadata on the folder
that is the root of the restored hierarchy.
We've gone back and forth as to whether we should save empty folders or
not. Long-term it seems like we should be. This starts this process (and
simplifies some of the logic). Empty folders will not be able to be
restored without further changes though as they are not directly
accessible through backup details.
Expand the set of folders selectors match on so they match if either
1. the parent path matches (mostly for items using folder selection)
2. the folder path matches
Add code to prepare for storing directory permissions in the directory
itself. This code allows for fetching directory permissions using the
RestoreCollection interface.
## Description
Changes:
- Use of `ptr` package to ensure safe dereferencing of pointers
- Update to query to ensure that `sharepointIds` are part of the response
- Alternate method created to obtain originating sharepoint site url
<!-- Insert PR description-->
## Does this PR need a docs update or release note?
- [x] ⛔ No
## Type of change
<!--- Please check the type of change your PR introduces: --->
- [x] 🌻 Feature
- [x] 🐛 Bugfix
## Issue(s)
<!-- Can reference multiple issues. Use one of the following "magic words" - "closes, fixes" to auto-close the Github issue. -->
* closes #1747<issue>
## Test Plan
<!-- How will this be tested prior to merging.-->
- [x] 💪 Manual
## Description
fault is aggregating recoverable errors, but no code currently reports them. This is a quick hack to add logging around those errors. In the future, we'll want to refine who and where performs this report.
## Does this PR need a docs update or release note?
- [x] ⛔ No
## Type of change
- [x] 🧹 Tech Debt/Cleanup
## Issue(s)
* #1970
## Test Plan
- [x] 💪 Manual
## Does this PR need a docs update or release note?
- [x] ⛔ No
## Type of change
- [x] 🧹 Tech Debt/Cleanup
## Issue(s)
* #2529
## Test Plan
- [x] ⚡ Unit test
## Description
Major changes:
* OneDrive files now store the lookup key in the first few bytes of the
file and then the file data. This allows the test framework to
continue working even when we switch to using item IDs as names
* Create a framework to create the data necessary for testing. This
framework uses something akin to the builder pattern and automatically
adds files to the collection if they should appear in that version.
For example, trying to add a metadata file to a backup version that
didn't have metadata files will result in a noop. Adding files will
also add the metadata to the aux file set
Long term this will hopefully make ensuring compatibility between OneDrive
versions easier because only a few places in the code need to be updated
to support another version. It also allows easy ranges over different
versions via for-loop
## Does this PR need a docs update or release note?
- [ ] ✅ Yes, it's included
- [ ] 🕐 Yes, but in a later PR
- [x] ⛔ No
## Type of change
- [ ] 🌻 Feature
- [ ] 🐛 Bugfix
- [ ] 🗺️ Documentation
- [x] 🤖 Test
- [ ] 💻 CI/Deployment
- [ ] 🧹 Tech Debt/Cleanup
## Issue(s)
* #1535
## Test Plan
- [ ] 💪 Manual
- [x] ⚡ Unit test
- [ ] 💚 E2E
## Description
This makes sure both the `.data` and `.meta` files for a OneDrive item are added to the exclude list so that both are deleted. It does nothing for dirs as of now as we will be moving the directory metadata to within the directory so that we can leverage kopia tree operations to take care of that.
## Does this PR need a docs update or release note?
- [ ] ✅ Yes, it's included
- [ ] 🕐 Yes, but in a later PR
- [ ] ⛔ No
## Type of change
<!--- Please check the type of change your PR introduces: --->
- [ ] 🌻 Feature
- [ ] 🐛 Bugfix
- [ ] 🗺️ Documentation
- [ ] 🤖 Test
- [ ] 💻 CI/Deployment
- [ ] 🧹 Tech Debt/Cleanup
## Issue(s)
<!-- Can reference multiple issues. Use one of the following "magic words" - "closes, fixes" to auto-close the Github issue. -->
* https://github.com/alcionai/corso/issues/2117
## Test Plan
<!-- How will this be tested prior to merging.-->
- [ ] 💪 Manual
- [ ] ⚡ Unit test
- [ ] 💚 E2E
## Description
It is possible that within a single delta query that files could be moved multiple times, this fixes that.
## Does this PR need a docs update or release note?
- [ ] ✅ Yes, it's included
- [x] 🕐 Yes, but in a later PR
- [ ] ⛔ No
## Type of change
<!--- Please check the type of change your PR introduces: --->
- [x] 🌻 Feature
- [ ] 🐛 Bugfix
- [ ] 🗺️ Documentation
- [ ] 🤖 Test
- [ ] 💻 CI/Deployment
- [ ] 🧹 Tech Debt/Cleanup
## Issue(s)
<!-- Can reference multiple issues. Use one of the following "magic words" - "closes, fixes" to auto-close the Github issue. -->
* fixes https://github.com/alcionai/corso/issues/2559
## Test Plan
<!-- How will this be tested prior to merging.-->
- [ ] 💪 Manual
- [x] ⚡ Unit test
- [ ] 💚 E2E
## Description
<!-- Insert PR description-->
## Does this PR need a docs update or release note?
- [ ] ✅ Yes, it's included
- [x] 🕐 Yes, but in a later PR
- [ ] ⛔ No
## Type of change
<!--- Please check the type of change your PR introduces: --->
- [x] 🌻 Feature
- [ ] 🐛 Bugfix
- [ ] 🗺️ Documentation
- [ ] 🤖 Test
- [ ] 💻 CI/Deployment
- [ ] 🧹 Tech Debt/Cleanup
## Issue(s)
<!-- Can reference multiple issues. Use one of the following "magic words" - "closes, fixes" to auto-close the Github issue. -->
* Final entry : closes https://github.com/alcionai/corso/issues/2242
## Test Plan
<!-- How will this be tested prior to merging.-->
- [ ] 💪 Manual
- [x] ⚡ Unit test
- [ ] 💚 E2E
## Description
Add code to restore items that have their file name stored in the corso metadata file instead of as the name of the kopia file.
This code is not executed as the conditional for it will not trigger (comparison to max int)
## Does this PR need a docs update or release note?
- [ ] ✅ Yes, it's included
- [ ] 🕐 Yes, but in a later PR
- [x] ⛔ No
## Type of change
- [x] 🌻 Feature
- [ ] 🐛 Bugfix
- [ ] 🗺️ Documentation
- [ ] 🤖 Test
- [ ] 💻 CI/Deployment
- [ ] 🧹 Tech Debt/Cleanup
## Issue(s)
* #1535
## Test Plan
- [x] 💪 Manual
- [ ] ⚡ Unit test
- [ ] 💚 E2E
## Description
This starts to store the name of the OneDrive file/directory in the corso metadata file for the OneDrive file/directory. This data is not yet used anywhere
## Does this PR need a docs update or release note?
- [ ] ✅ Yes, it's included
- [ ] 🕐 Yes, but in a later PR
- [x] ⛔ No
## Type of change
- [x] 🌻 Feature
- [ ] 🐛 Bugfix
- [ ] 🗺️ Documentation
- [ ] 🤖 Test
- [ ] 💻 CI/Deployment
- [ ] 🧹 Tech Debt/Cleanup
## Issue(s)
* #1535
## Test Plan
- [x] 💪 Manual
- [ ] ⚡ Unit test
- [ ] 💚 E2E
## Description
Use the check to see if a user has access to OneDrive/Exchange to also see if the user exists. This does not stop the population of GraphConnector users every time an instance is created, but does move us one step closer to that
Manually tested the following cases:
* backup "*"
* backup single existing user without error
* backup multiple existing users without error
* error when attempting to backup user that doesn't exist in the same domain
* error when attempting to backup user that doesn't exist in a different domain
Sample error output (progress disabled):
```text
No backups available
Error: 1 error occurred:
* Failed to run Exchange backup for user foo@other.onmicrosoft.com: doing backup: producing backup data collections: resource owner [foo@other.onmicrosoft.com] not found within tenant
```
## Does this PR need a docs update or release note?
- [ ] ✅ Yes, it's included
- [ ] 🕐 Yes, but in a later PR
- [x] ⛔ No
## Type of change
- [ ] 🌻 Feature
- [ ] 🐛 Bugfix
- [ ] 🗺️ Documentation
- [ ] 🤖 Test
- [ ] 💻 CI/Deployment
- [x] 🧹 Tech Debt/Cleanup
## Issue(s)
* #1547
## Test Plan
- [x] 💪 Manual
- [ ] ⚡ Unit test
- [ ] 💚 E2E
## Description
Print api response in logs for 4xx errors from GC. More info for things like 400 Bad Request could be useful.
## Does this PR need a docs update or release note?
- [ ] ✅ Yes, it's included
- [ ] 🕐 Yes, but in a later PR
- [x] ⛔ No
## Type of change
<!--- Please check the type of change your PR introduces: --->
- [ ] 🌻 Feature
- [ ] 🐛 Bugfix
- [ ] 🗺️ Documentation
- [ ] 🤖 Test
- [ ] 💻 CI/Deployment
- [x] 🧹 Tech Debt/Cleanup
## Issue(s)
<!-- Can reference multiple issues. Use one of the following "magic words" - "closes, fixes" to auto-close the Github issue. -->
* #<issue>
## Test Plan
<!-- How will this be tested prior to merging.-->
- [x] 💪 Manual
- [ ] ⚡ Unit test
- [ ] 💚 E2E
## Does this PR need a docs update or release note?
- [x] ⛔ No
## Type of change
- [x] 🧹 Tech Debt/Cleanup
## Issue(s)
* #1970
## Test Plan
- [x] ⚡ Unit test
- [x] 💚 E2E
## Does this PR need a docs update or release note?
- [x] ⛔ No
## Type of change
- [x] 🧹 Tech Debt/Cleanup
## Issue(s)
* #1970
## Test Plan
- [x] ⚡ Unit test
- [x] 💚 E2E
## Description
This should help in figuring out more retry failures.
## Does this PR need a docs update or release note?
- [ ] ✅ Yes, it's included
- [ ] 🕐 Yes, but in a later PR
- [x] ⛔ No
## Type of change
<!--- Please check the type of change your PR introduces: --->
- [ ] 🌻 Feature
- [ ] 🐛 Bugfix
- [ ] 🗺️ Documentation
- [ ] 🤖 Test
- [ ] 💻 CI/Deployment
- [x] 🧹 Tech Debt/Cleanup
## Issue(s)
<!-- Can reference multiple issues. Use one of the following "magic words" - "closes, fixes" to auto-close the Github issue. -->
* #<issue>
## Test Plan
<!-- How will this be tested prior to merging.-->
- [x] 💪 Manual
- [ ] ⚡ Unit test
- [ ] 💚 E2E
## Description
Record the number of entries in the saved metadata. This could help catch odd situations like not finding anything to backup.
## Does this PR need a docs update or release note?
- [ ] ✅ Yes, it's included
- [ ] 🕐 Yes, but in a later PR
- [x] ⛔ No
## Type of change
- [ ] 🌻 Feature
- [ ] 🐛 Bugfix
- [ ] 🗺️ Documentation
- [ ] 🤖 Test
- [ ] 💻 CI/Deployment
- [x] 🧹 Tech Debt/Cleanup
## Issue(s)
* #2550
## Test Plan
- [x] 💪 Manual
- [ ] ⚡ Unit test
- [ ] 💚 E2E
## Does this PR need a docs update or release note?
- [x] ⛔ No
## Type of change
- [x] 🧹 Tech Debt/Cleanup
## Issue(s)
* #1970
## Test Plan
- [x] ⚡ Unit test
- [x] 💚 E2E
## Description
Pulls in fix for a panic caused by concurrent map updates in the clues pkg
## Does this PR need a docs update or release note?
- [ ] ✅ Yes, it's included
- [ ] 🕐 Yes, but in a later PR
- [x] ⛔ No
## Type of change
<!--- Please check the type of change your PR introduces: --->
- [ ] 🌻 Feature
- [x] 🐛 Bugfix
- [ ] 🗺️ Documentation
- [ ] 🤖 Test
- [ ] 💻 CI/Deployment
- [ ] 🧹 Tech Debt/Cleanup
## Test Plan
<!-- How will this be tested prior to merging.-->
- [ ] 💪 Manual
- [x] ⚡ Unit test
- [x] 💚 E2E
## Description
- Use of ptr package for next link and delta links.
- Added logging to verify the presence of receiving invalid next links from M365.
<!-- Insert PR description-->
## Does this PR need a docs update or release note?
- [x] ⛔ No
- Related to #2520
## Type of change
- [x] 🧹 Tech Debt/Cleanup
## Test Plan
<!-- How will this be tested prior to merging.-->
- [x] ⚡ Unit test
## Does this PR need a docs update or release note?
- [x] ⛔ No
## Type of change
- [x] 🧹 Tech Debt/Cleanup
## Issue(s)
* #1970
## Test Plan
- [x] ⚡ Unit test
- [x] 💚 E2E
## Description
Using this over extracting errors from the snapshot allows us to see all errors. The errors that each directory tracks are truncated when the directory is serialized for persistence if there're too many.
With the current `fault.Errors` behavior this cases the backup to fail if there's any errors
kopia ignored. This is consistent with behavior in the backup op that checks for any errors.
Unclear what the CLI output and log messages will be for these errors as they are grouped
into all other errors reported through the fault package
## Does this PR need a docs update or release note?
- [ ] ✅ Yes, it's included
- [ ] 🕐 Yes, but in a later PR
- [x] ⛔ No
## Type of change
- [ ] 🌻 Feature
- [x] 🐛 Bugfix
- [ ] 🗺️ Documentation
- [ ] 🤖 Test
- [ ] 💻 CI/Deployment
- [ ] 🧹 Tech Debt/Cleanup
## Issue(s)
* #2548
## Test Plan
- [ ] 💪 Manual
- [x] ⚡ Unit test
- [ ] 💚 E2E
## Description
This allows corso to continue making a snapshot even if the expected directory in the base is not found. The fact that the entry wasn't found will be logged
This should be safe so long as backups that had any sort of error, including "non-catastrophic" errors are marked as failed. Marking those as failed ensures that corso is using a matched set of metadata and data in the base snapshot rather than a partial snapshot
## Does this PR need a docs update or release note?
- [ ] ✅ Yes, it's included
- [x] 🕐 Yes, but in a later PR
- [ ] ⛔ No
## Type of change
- [ ] 🌻 Feature
- [x] 🐛 Bugfix
- [ ] 🗺️ Documentation
- [ ] 🤖 Test
- [ ] 💻 CI/Deployment
- [ ] 🧹 Tech Debt/Cleanup
## Issue(s)
* #2550
## Test Plan
- [ ] 💪 Manual
- [x] ⚡ Unit test
- [ ] 💚 E2E
## Description
Just handing the base directory to kopia doesn't let us see which items have been added which means we can't properly merge backup details later on.
Future implementations could do backup details merging based on path prefixes which could fix this problem.
## Does this PR need a docs update or release note?
- [ ] ✅ Yes, it's included
- [ ] 🕐 Yes, but in a later PR
- [x] ⛔ No
## Type of change
- [ ] 🌻 Feature
- [x] 🐛 Bugfix
- [ ] 🗺️ Documentation
- [ ] 🤖 Test
- [ ] 💻 CI/Deployment
- [ ] 🧹 Tech Debt/Cleanup
## Issue(s)
* closes#2521
## Test Plan
- [ ] 💪 Manual
- [x] ⚡ Unit test
- [ ] 💚 E2E
## Description
In order for corso to track recoverable errors,
we need to pass a fault.Errors struct into the
items stream. As long as we're doing that, we
might as well pass along the available ctx as well.
## Does this PR need a docs update or release note?
- [x] ⛔ No
## Type of change
- [x] 🧹 Tech Debt/Cleanup
## Issue(s)
* #1970
## Test Plan
- [x] ⚡ Unit test
- [x] 💚 E2E
## Description
- parentReference for deleted items will not have path.
- GC was not responding with deleted state
- Deleted items are not streamed by kopia
Borrows some changes from https://github.com/alcionai/corso/pull/2503/files as that might be delayed with on merge. Will rebase that if this gets merged fist.
## Does this PR need a docs update or release note?
- [ ] ✅ Yes, it's included
- [x] 🕐 Yes, but in a later PR
- [ ] ⛔ No
## Type of change
<!--- Please check the type of change your PR introduces: --->
- [x] 🌻 Feature
- [ ] 🐛 Bugfix
- [ ] 🗺️ Documentation
- [ ] 🤖 Test
- [ ] 💻 CI/Deployment
- [ ] 🧹 Tech Debt/Cleanup
## Issue(s)
<!-- Can reference multiple issues. Use one of the following "magic words" - "closes, fixes" to auto-close the Github issue. -->
* https://github.com/alcionai/corso/issues/2117
* fixes https://github.com/alcionai/corso/issues/2517
## Test Plan
<!-- How will this be tested prior to merging.-->
- [ ] 💪 Manual
- [x] ⚡ Unit test
- [ ] 💚 E2E
## Description
Use the new suite.Suite wrappers in tester package. Also update suite.Run and some nolint directives.
## Does this PR need a docs update or release note?
- [ ] ✅ Yes, it's included
- [ ] 🕐 Yes, but in a later PR
- [x] ⛔ No
## Type of change
- [ ] 🌻 Feature
- [ ] 🐛 Bugfix
- [ ] 🗺️ Documentation
- [x] 🤖 Test
- [ ] 💻 CI/Deployment
- [x] 🧹 Tech Debt/Cleanup
## Issue(s)
* #2373
## Test Plan
- [ ] 💪 Manual
- [x] ⚡ Unit test
- [ ] 💚 E2E
## Does this PR need a docs update or release note?
- [ ] ✅ Yes, it's included
- [ ] 🕐 Yes, but in a later PR
- [x] ⛔ No
## Type of change
- [ ] 🌻 Feature
- [ ] 🐛 Bugfix
- [ ] 🗺️ Documentation
- [x] 🤖 Test
- [ ] 💻 CI/Deployment
- [x] 🧹 Tech Debt/Cleanup
## Issue(s)
* #2373
## Test Plan
- [ ] 💪 Manual
- [x] ⚡ Unit test
- [ ] 💚 E2E
## Description
Folders replaced after a delete should not have their subfolders reparented to the new folder.
## Does this PR need a docs update or release note?
- [ ] ✅ Yes, it's included
- [ ] 🕐 Yes, but in a later PR
- [x] ⛔ No
## Type of change
- [ ] 🌻 Feature
- [ ] 🐛 Bugfix
- [ ] 🗺️ Documentation
- [x] 🤖 Test
- [ ] 💻 CI/Deployment
- [ ] 🧹 Tech Debt/Cleanup
## Test Plan
- [ ] 💪 Manual
- [x] ⚡ Unit test
- [ ] 💚 E2E
## Description
To ensure that the observe channel handling
doesn't accidentally spawn unkillable routines,
adds a centralized channel listener func for
standard channel management in observe
progress bars.
## Does this PR need a docs update or release note?
- [x] ⛔ No
## Type of change
- [x] 🐛 Bugfix
## Test Plan
- [x] 💪 Manual
- [x] ⚡ Unit test
## Description
Ties up the final piece of https://github.com/alcionai/corso/issues/2123. Add handling of moves for folder / files in delta response.
## Does this PR need a docs update or release note?
- [ ] ✅ Yes, it's included
- [x] 🕐 Yes, but in a later PR
- [ ] ⛔ No
## Type of change
<!--- Please check the type of change your PR introduces: --->
- [x] 🌻 Feature
- [ ] 🐛 Bugfix
- [ ] 🗺️ Documentation
- [ ] 🤖 Test
- [ ] 💻 CI/Deployment
- [ ] 🧹 Tech Debt/Cleanup
## Issue(s)
<!-- Can reference multiple issues. Use one of the following "magic words" - "closes, fixes" to auto-close the Github issue. -->
* https://github.com/alcionai/corso/issues/2123
## Test Plan
<!-- How will this be tested prior to merging.-->
- [ ] 💪 Manual
- [x] ⚡ Unit test
- [ ] 💚 E2E
## Does this PR need a docs update or release note?
- [x] ⛔ No
## Type of change
- [x] 🧹 Tech Debt/Cleanup
## Issue(s)
* #1970
## Test Plan
- [x] ⚡ Unit test
- [x] 💚 E2E
## Description
Due to recent changes with `Incrementals` restore of Library categories stopped working. This PR will allow for files that do not require special folder permissions to be restored. Changes involve the folder naming format that was coming from the CLI
<!-- Insert PR description-->
## Does this PR need a docs update or release note?
- [x] ⛔ No
## Type of change
- [x] 🐛 Bugfix
## Issue(s)
<!-- Can reference multiple issues. Use one of the following "magic words" - "closes, fixes" to auto-close the Github issue. -->
* closes #2489<issue>
## Test Plan
<!-- How will this be tested prior to merging.-->
- [x] 💪 Manual
## Description
Now that we're also testing permissions behavior the OneDrive tests have gotten kind of large. This PR consolidates some of the code for tests and moves the OneDrive tests to their own file
It also sets things up so it's easier to add tests for different backup layouts in the future
Viewing by commit may make reviews easier
## Does this PR need a docs update or release note?
- [ ] ✅ Yes, it's included
- [ ] 🕐 Yes, but in a later PR
- [x] ⛔ No
## Type of change
- [ ] 🌻 Feature
- [ ] 🐛 Bugfix
- [ ] 🗺️ Documentation
- [x] 🤖 Test
- [ ] 💻 CI/Deployment
- [ ] 🧹 Tech Debt/Cleanup
## Issue(s)
* #2447
## Test Plan
<!-- How will this be tested prior to merging.-->
- [ ] 💪 Manual
- [x] ⚡ Unit test
- [ ] 💚 E2E
## Does this PR need a docs update or release note?
- [ ] ⛔ No
## Type of change
- [x] 🧹 Tech Debt/Cleanup
## Issue(s)
* #1970
## Test Plan
- [x] ⚡ Unit test
- [x] 💚 E2E
## Description
Proof of concept for how to wrap suite.Suite and insert our own logic for determining if a test should be skipped or not.
Adds a new env var for running only integration tests
May require future work to add unit tests with the same (non-default) labels as their integration tests
## Does this PR need a docs update or release note?
- [ ] ✅ Yes, it's included
- [ ] 🕐 Yes, but in a later PR
- [x] ⛔ No
## Type of change
- [ ] 🌻 Feature
- [ ] 🐛 Bugfix
- [ ] 🗺️ Documentation
- [x] 🤖 Test
- [ ] 💻 CI/Deployment
- [x] 🧹 Tech Debt/Cleanup
## Issue(s)
* #2373
## Test Plan
- [ ] 💪 Manual
- [x] ⚡ Unit test
- [ ] 💚 E2E
## Description
Added retry middleware which handles retrial of all HTTP request if,
- internalServerError
- request timeout
with default no of retrials being 3.
## Does this PR need a docs update or release note?
- [ ] ⛔ No
## Type of change
<!--- Please check the type of change your PR introduces: --->
- [x] 🧹 Tech Debt/Cleanup
## Issue(s)
* https://github.com/alcionai/corso/issues/2287
## Test Plan
- [x] 💪 Manual
